| Review Article |
Open Access |
|
| Biodegradability of Polythene and Plastic by the Help of Microorganism:
A Way for Brighter Future |
| Nayak Priyanka*and Tiwari Archana |
| School of Biotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Airport Road, Bypass Bhopal |
| *Corresponding author: |
Dr. Nayak Priyanka
School of Biotechnology
Rajiv Gandhi
Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya
Airport Road, Bypass Bhopal
Tel: +91 9893499474
E-mail: nayakpri17@gmail.com |
|
| |
| Received August 20, 2011; Accepted December 02, 2011; Published December
04, 2011 |
| |
| Citation: Priyanka N, Archana T (2011) Biodegradability of Polythene and Plastic
by the Help of Microorganism: A Way for Brighter Future. J Environment Analytic
Toxicol 1:111. doi:10.4172/2161-0525.1000111 |
| |
| Copyright: © 2011 Priyanka N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited. |
| |
| Abstract |
| |
| The current research makes a comparative analysis between the biodegradation of polythene and plastic by five
different types of soil sample collected from different sources. The five soil sample (A, B, C, D, E) were indigenous to
locations: (A) Medicinal Garden soil, (B) Sewage Water Soil, (C) Energy Park soil, (D) Sludge Area soil, (E) Agricultural
Soil, respectively. The ability of these soils in degrading polythene and plastic was investigated. And pure culture
with sample, incubate for one week and sub culturing is done in every week, for bacteria and fungi, for the purpose
of biodegradation. The initial and final dry weight of polythene and plastic before and after incubation in the culture
medium were compared and the % of degradation was calculated. Among all the treatments various species of bacteria
and fungi such as Bacillus subtilis, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus nidulance, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus glaucus,
Penicillum species, Pseudomonas sp., Staphylococcus aureus., Streptococcus lactis, Proteus vulgaris, Micrococcus
sp. were found to degrade polythene and plastic efficiently. However various species of fungi and bacteria isolated from
different soil sample. Overall polythene gave rapid biodegradation as compare to plastic. The active enzymes produced
by the bacteria and fungi caused weight loss in the sample of polythene and plastic. |
| |
| Keywords |
| |
| Biodegradation; Polythene; Plastics; Environment;
Microbial tools |
| |
| Introduction |
| |
| Biological degradation is generally considered as a phenomenon of
biological transformation of organic compounds by living organisms
particularly microbes. It has been considered as a natural process in
the microbial world as carbon and energy source for their growth and
takes a key role in the recycling of materials in the natural ecosystem
[1]. Organic material can be degraded aerobically with oxygen, or anaerobically,
without oxygen. |
| |
| Aerobic biodegradation |
| |
| Aerobic biodegradation is also known as aerobic respiration and it is
an important component of the natural attenuation of contaminants at
many hazardous waste sites. Aerobic bacteria use oxygen as an electron
acceptor, and break down organic chemicals into smaller organic
compounds, often producing CO2 and water as the final product [2]. |
| |
| Anaerobic biodegradation |
| |
| Anaerobic biodegradation is an important component of
the natural attenuation of contaminants at many hazardous waste sites.
It is the breakdown of organic contaminants by microorganisms when
oxygen is not present. Some anaerobic bacteria use nitrate, sulfate, iron,
manganese, and carbon dioxide as their electron acceptors, and break
down organic chemicals into smaller compounds [3]. A very visible
portion of municipal and industrial waste consists of polyethylene
(PE) films utilized on a massive scale as wrapping material, a typical
example for the end- consumer being shopping bags. PE is also used in
large quantities in agriculture for green-house construction or directly
applied on the soil surface as mulching films. Plastic litter has become
an omnipresent part of our environment. Although there are almost no
data about the environmental fate of the fragments, it seems that their
biodegradation is extremely slow and currently it is hardly possible to
make even a rough estimation regarding the time necessary for their
biodegradation to some substantial extent [3]. The only known adverse
environmental effects of PE films are when they are swallowed by wild
animals and encapsulation of material on landfills and in the soil, thus altering microbial processes towards anaerobiosis [2]. For this type of
contamination the term ‘‘macropollutants’’ is sometimes used. The
polythene and plastic could sometimes cause blockage in intestine
of fish, birds, cow, deer and various mammals [4]. Plastic is one of
the few new chemical material which pose environmental problems.
Polyethylene, polypropinyl chloride, polystyrene is largely used in the
manufacture of plastics. These chemicals are resistant to biodegradation
and persist in soil environment for a long time. And the degradable
plastic is substance created from a polymer called Polyolefin combined
with certain additives, in order for it decompose or degrade. High
density and low density polyethylene’s are the most commonly used
synthetic plastics [5]. They are extremely hazardous particularly the
thin color ones. They release toxic chemicals which contaminate food
items [6]. Biodegradation is governed by different factors that include
polymer characteristics, type of organism, and nature of pretreatment.
The polymer characteristics such as its mobility, crystallinity, molecular
weight, the type of functional groups and substituents present in its
structure, and plasticizers or additives added to the polymer all play
an important role in its degradation [7]. Degradable plastics is a plastic
designed to undergo a significant change in its chemical structure under
specific environmental conditions resulting in a loss of some properties
that may vary as measured by standard test methods appropriate to
the plastic and the application in a period of time that determines its
classification [8]. Degradability of a material is a property of a material
to break down into simpler parts by bacterial (biodegradable), thermal
(oxidative) or ultraviolet (photodegradable) action. In order for polyolefin or a degradable polymer to be used as a plastic bag, it needs
to comply by the following requirements: Be able to be formed into
film, Have adequate tensile strength and elongation [9]. Have adequate
puncture resistance, and usually possess properties that resemble lowdensity
polyethylene (LDPE) or high density polyethylene (HDPE) in
overall physical properties and rheological characteristics. Degradable
polymers are usually classified in two different ways: First is the way
degradation method: If the process requires microbial action or whether
they require heat, UV light, mechanical stress or water in order to break
down. Second is the way they are manufactured: If they are produced
using natural starch polymers, from synthetic polymers or from a
mixture of a usual polymer with an additive to aid the degradation
[10]. It is important to consider the microbial degradation of natural
and synthetic polymers in order to understand what is necessary
for biodegradation and the mechanism involved. This required
understanding of the interaction between materials and microorganism
and the biochemical changes involved [11]. As the polythene & plastic
has become a part of modern day living right from packaging to making
toys and various other applications. Normally they are petroleum
products where alkenes oxides are polymerized to form plastics such as
polythene. Plastic is one of the few new chemical material which pose
environmental problems. Some microorganism such as bacteria, fungi,
and actinomycetes are involved in the degradation of both natural
and synthetic plastics [12-13]. The biodegradation of plastics proceeds
actively under different soil conditions according to their properties,
because the microorganism responsible for the degradation differs
from each other and they have their own optimal growth conditions
in the soil [14]. In the last 10 years, several biodegradable plastics have
been introduced into the market. However, none of them is efficiently
biodegradable in landfills. For this reason, none of the products has
gained widespread use. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop
efficient microorganism and their products to solve this global issue.
Thus the main objective of this review is the biodegradation studies of
polythene and plastics in soil, inside the laboratory (under controlled condition) and outside the laboratory (under natural condition) by the
help of microbial tools [15]. |
| |
| Materials and Methods |
| |
| Sample collection from different sites for microbial
degradation |
| |
| Soil sample from 5 different locations (A=Medicinal garden soil,
B=Sewage soil, C=Energy park soil, D=Sludge area soil, E=Agricultural
soil) were collected to isolate microorganism on the basis of the type
of microorganism available in various environmental condition [16]
(Table 1). |
| |
|
| |
| Physico-chemical parameters |
| |
| Various parameters were tested for the soil morphology, which
are pH, Temperature, Total Alkalinity, % of Organic Matter, % of
Chlorides, and Moisture content which are present in the soil samples
[17] (Table 1). |
| |
| In-situ Degradation of polythene and plastics in the soil |
| |
| In this the Polythene bags and plastic cups were cut in small
strips, Thoroughly rinsed with tap water and then distilled water, Dry
these strips under room temperature, Then take the initial weight of
the strips, Polythene bags and plastic cups will be incubated in the
container, containing selected soil, After a specific period of time,
films were removed from the soil, Again rinsed with tap water and
then immersion in distilled water, until it remained clear and drying in
oven, Now measure the weight. Biodegradation of the samples (Figure
1)was followed by measuring the weight loss of samples, and bacterial
activity in soil [18]. |
| |
|
Figure 1: In-situ degradation of soil |
|
| |
| Isolation of Microorganism |
| |
| Serial dilution |
| |
| 1gm of soil sample was taken and is mixed with 10ml of distilled water, then 8 sterile test tubes were taken with 9ml of distilled water
in each tube, 1ml of soil sample was transfer serially to all the tubes to
make a dilution 10-1 to 10-8. Then they were placed on following media
either by spread plate or pour plate method. Now 1ml of solution
from each tube was plated on the Petri plates containing nutrient agar
medium (NAM). Plates were incubated for 2-days at 30°C [21] |
| |
| Pure culture method |
| |
| Prepare starch agar media and pour it aseptically into sterile Petri
dish, allowed it to solidify. Inoculate the culture with a loop. Incubate
the inoculated starch agar plate at 30°C for 2 days. At the end of
incubation period flood the agar surface with grams iodine solution.
Keep it for a min and pour off. Observe the plate carefully and describe
the result. After that a single colony is taken from the grown culture
and streaked on agar media, it was incubated for 1 or 2 days, after
the specified period growth of the organism is observed. Among the
bacterial and fungal colonies, the dominant ones were isolated and subcultured
repeatedly for getting pure colonies. (Figure 2) |
| |
|
Figure 2:microorganism associated as bacteria and fungi |
|
| |
| Identification and Characterization of Microorganism |
| |
| Gram staining |
| |
| Gram-staining is a four part procedure which uses certain dyes to
make a bacterial cell stand out against its background [22]. |
| |
| Biochemical test |
| |
| These tests were done for the conformation of microorganism. The
tests are amylase test, indole test, catalase test, citrate utilization test,
and methyl red test and amylase test [17]. As Amylase is an exoenzyme
that hydrolyses starch a polysaccharide into maltose, a disaccharide
and some monosaccharide such as glucose. In which examine the plates
for the starch hydrolysis around the line of growth of each organism
i.e the colour change of the medium. The ability of few organisms to
produce indole may be used as one of the differentiation characters for
enterobacteriaceac. The presence of indole can be detected by Kovac’s
reagent. React with indole producing a bright red colour on the surface
of the medium.The negative result is shown for Bacillus & proteus sp.
i.e. the absence of red colour indicating that the tryptophan was not
hydrolyzed and so the bacteria are indole negative. In the absence of
glucose or lactose some micro organism uses citrate as the carbon
source which depends upon the presence of citrate permease [23].
A positive test shows a blue color on the streak of growth Retention
of original green color & no growth on the line of streak indicates a negative reaction. Methyl red is used in the Methyl Red (MR) Test,
used to identify bacteria. This test is used to differentiate among the
Gram-Negative bacilli in the family Enterobacteriaceae. A bright red
color indicating a pH of 4.2 or less is a positive test. Yellow or orange
color indicates a negative reaction while a weak positive test will be red
orange. Catalase production can be determined by adding the substrate
hydrogen peroxide to an approximately incubated nutrient agar slant
culture. Examine immediately and after 5 min for the evolution of
bubbles which indicates a positive test (Table 2). |
| |
|
| |
| Microbial Degradation of Polythene and Plastic under
laboratory Condition |
| |
| It means the degradation inside the media for which Prepare
starch agar medium, Pour it on Petri dish and allow it to solidify
[24-26] (Table 4 and Table 5). Now inoculate the degraded strips in
the medium. Incubate the disc at 37°C for 48 hrs. And the growth is
observed on the plate. Now sub culturing is done in every 15 days and
observed the % of degradation. (Figure 3) |
| |
|
Table 4: Degradation of fungi inside the laboratory |
|
| |
|
Table 5: Degradation of bacteria inside the laboratory |
|
| |
|
Figure 3: degradation of polythene by the microbes. |
|
| |
| Microorganism associated with Plastics and Polythene |
| |
| The microorganism associated with the polythene bags and plastic
cups were quantified and identified [19]. The microbial species identified
from degrading polythene bags and plastic cups were:-Bacillus subtilis,Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus nidulance, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus
glaucus, Penicillum species, Pseudomonas sp., Staphylococcus aureus.,
Streptococcus lactis, Proteus vulgaris, Micrococcus luteus (Table 2 and
Table 3). |
| |
|
| |
| Result and Discussion |
| |
| Various species from 5 different locations (Table 1) were isolated
and characterized basing on their morphological and biochemical
characteristics. The polythene and plastic degradation in the soil, serves
as a dumping site of these materials. The biodegradation of polythene
is relatively faster and earlier than that of the plastics. The surface of
materials has turned from smooth to rough with cracking. This may
be due to the compounds secreted extracellularly by the microbes that
may break the complex molecular structure of plastics. The bacterial
and fungal species from 5 different locations of soil were isolated
and characterized basing on their morphological and biochemical
characteristics. Various microbial species were tested in the laboratory
for their ability and degrading the polythene and plastics. The species
tested were B1(Pseudomonas), B2(Bacillus subtilis), B3(Staphylococcus
aureus), B4(Streptococcus lactis), B5(Proteus vulgaris),B6 (Micrococcus
luteus), F1(Aspergillus niger), F2(Aspergillus nidulance),F3(Aspergillus
flavus), F4(Aspergillus glaucus), F5(Penicillium). These microbes were
separately allowed to degrade the polythene and plastics inside the
laboratory and outside the laboratory. The degradation of polythene
and plastic films was compared by the weight loss of the samples inside
the soil/outside the environment and in the media/inside the laboratory.
This study evidence that the degradation rate is faster in the laboratory
condition because individual microorganism inoculated with sample
which may help in the degradation of polythene and plastics. |
| |
| Acknowledgements |
| |
| The author’s are thankful to the School of Biotechnology and the Rajiv Gandhi
Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya for providing facilities. |
| |
|
| References |
| |
- Joel FR (1995) Polymer Science & Technology: Introduction To Polymer
Science, Eds. 3, Pub: Prentice Hall PTR Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
07458. P: 4-9.
- Seymour RB (1989) Polymer Science Before & After 1899: Notable
Developments During The Lifetime Of Maurtis Dekkar. J Macromol Sci Chem
26: 1023-1032.
- Datta, P.K., K. Mishra, and M N V R Kumar. Popular Plastics And Packaging,
Mahindra Publishers,1998 New Delhi, India. P. 73.
- Saber, I. Plastic Industry In Pakistan.
- Sabir, I. Plastic Industry In Pakistan.
- Rivard C, Moens L, Roberts K, Brigham J, Kelley S (1995) Starch esters
as biodegradable plastics: effect of ester group chain length and degree of
substitution on anaerobic biodegradation. Enzyme Microbial Tech. 17: 848-852.
- Cooper, W, And G Vaughan. Recent Developments In The Polymerization Of
Conjugated Dienes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1: 91-160. 1967.
- Albertsson AC, Andersson SO, Karlsson S (1987) The mechanism of
biodegradation of polyethylene. Polym Degrade stab 18: 73-87.
- Emma Seigel, Lisa Barlow (1999) Biodegradable Plastics.
- Narayan and Pettigrew; 1999.
- Albertsson, C H Andersson, C H , Andersson, S.O. and Karlsson S.: Polymer
Degrad. Stability, (18): 73-87 (1987).
- Andersson AC, S Karlsson (1990) The Influence Of Biotic And Abitic
Environments On The Degradation Of Polyethylene. Prog Polym Sci 15: 177-
192.
- Anonymous, Ecological assessment of ECM plastics. Microtech Research Inc.,
Ohio, Report by Chem Risk-A service of Mc Laren Hart Inc. Ohio, p.14.1999.
- Gemini S., Tennakoon, N.S., Weerasekara, M.L.M.A.W. and Nandasena, K.A.:
Current Sci., 90, No (1). 2006.
- Albertsson A C (1978) Biodegradation Of Synthetic Polymers II. A Limited
Microbial Conversion Of 14C In Polyethylene To 14CO2 By Some Soil Fungi. J
Appl Polym Sci 22: 3419-3433.
- Sonil Nanda, Smiti Snigdha, Sahu, Jayanthi Abraham (2010) Orissa University
of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar 751 003, Orissa, Studies on the
biodegradation of natural and synthetic polyethylene by Pseudomonas spp.
- Griffin GJL (2007) Degradation of polyethylene in compost burial. J Polym Sci
Polym Symp 57: 281-286.
- Kathiresan k (2003) polythene and plastics degrading microbes from mangrove
soil. Rev Biol Trop 51: 629-634.
- Anonymous, Ecological assessment of ECM plastics. Microtech Research Inc.,
Ohio, Report by Chem Risk-A service of Mc Laren Hart Inc. Ohio, p.14. 1999.
- Barrow G I, Feltham R K A (1993) Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the
Identification of Medical Bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Koutny M, Lemaire J, Delort AM (2005) Biodegradation of polyethylene films
with prooxidant additives. Chemosphere 64: 1243–1252.
- Ch vijaya , r mallikarjuna reddy. Impact of soil composting using municipal
solid waste on b Bouchez, Bouchez M, Blanchet D, Vandecasteele JP (1995)
Substrate availability in phenanthrene biodegradation: transfer mechanism and
influence on metabolism. Appl Microbiol Biot 43: 952–960.
- Orr IG, Hadar Y, Sivan A (2004) Colonization, biofilm formation and
biodegradation of polyethylene by a strain of Rhodococcus rubber. Appl
Microbiol Biot 65: 97–104.
- Chiellini, E 2004 Which polymers are biodegradable? CEEES Workshop November
4, Brussels, Belgium.
- Pometto AL 3rd, Lee BT, Johnson KE (1992) Production of an extracellular
polyethylene-degrading enzyme(s) by Streptomyces species. Appl Environ
Microb 58: 731–733.
- Kirk TK, Tien M, Faison BD (1984) Biochemistry of the oxidation of lignin by
Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biotechnol Adv 2: 183–199.
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
This Article |
DOWNLOAD |
|
CONTRIBUTE |
|
SHARE |
|
EXPLORE |
|
 |
 |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Untitled Document
|
|
|
|
|