Clinical Studies on Hormonal Status in
Breast Cancer and its Impact on Quality of
Life(QOL) |
Kaiser Jamil1,2*, Kalyan Kumar1, S. Hajira Fatima1,2, Syed Rabbani1,2
Ravi Kumar3, Ramesh Perimi4 |
| 1School of Biotechnology- MGNIRSA,
Street no-17, GaganMahal Road, Domalguda, Hyderabad-500029, A.P. India |
| 2Genetics Department,
Bhagwan Mahavir Medical Research Centre,
10-1-1, Mahavir Marg, Hyderabad- 500004, A.P., India |
| 3Medical Oncologist,
11-3-936, Mallapally Clinic,
Hyderabad- 500001, A.P. India |
| 4Surgical Oncologist,
Mahavir Hospital and Research Centre,
10-1-1, Mahavir Marg, Hyderabad- 500004, A.P., India |
| *Corresponding author: |
Dr . Kaiser Jamil, School of Biotechnology- MGNIRSA,
Street no-17, GaganMahal Road, Domalguda,
Hyderabad-500029, A.P. India,
Tel : +91-40-27810133,
Mobile: 919849706385,
Fax : +91-40-66631500
E-mail : Kaiser.jamil@gmail.com |
|
| Received November 03, 2009; Accepted December 29, 2009; Published
December 29, 2009 |
| Citation: Jamil K, Kumar K, Fatima SH, Rabbani S, Kumar R, et al.
(2009) Clinical Studies on Hormonal Status in Breast Cancer and its
Impact on Quality of Life (QOL). J Cancer Sci Ther 1: 083-089. doi:10.4172/1948-5956.1000013 |
| Copyright: ©2009 Dyavanagoudar SN. This is an open-access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
| Abstract |
Breast cancer is a steroid hormone–dependent tumor. Stratification of patients according
to hormone (ER/ PR) receptor status and nodal metastasis is of great therapeutic
importance. In this investigation, we could enroll 79 pre and post-menopausal breast
cancer patients voluntarily. We classified these cases into four categories of the
combinations of ER/PR positive, negative and mixed statuses. Their hormone receptor
status as determined by immunohistochemistry correlated with therapy regimens like
chemotherapy, hormone therapy and QOL responses. We found that in ER+/PR- and ER-
/PR- tumors were more frequent in postmenopausal women than ER+/PR+ tumors. The
ER+/PR- tumors were larger than ER+/PR+ tumors. In addition, 21.51% of ER+/PR- and
17.72% of ER-/PR- patients had four or more axillary nodes involved with tumors
compared to patients with ER+/PR+ tumors (7.59%). Postmenopausal women with
ER+/PR- and ER-/PR- who received adjuvant hormonal therapy or combination of chemo
drugs like Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, 5-FU (FAC) and Cyclophosphamide,
Alurubicin, 5-FU (CAF) showed good response than premenopausal women. Forty
patients receiving tamoxifen (hormone therapy) along with other chemo- drugs also
showed good response. Tamoxifen induced substantial tumor regression and increased
disease free survival. It is concluded that hormone receptor status is important in deciding
the choice of treatment for all subgroups and influenced the QOL. Another significant
observation was that the frequency of ER+/PR- and ER-/PR- tumors was higher in this
study group compared to ER+/PR+ tumors. This is the first report from south Indian
population indicating the importance of hormonal status in deciding therapeutic regimens
in breast cancer patients affecting their QOL. |
|
|
|