Home   |  Publications   |   Conferences    |  Join   |   Contact   | Sitemap  

Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis

Open Access
home » immune-abnormalities-in-patients-meeting-new-diagnostic-criteria-for-chronic-fatigue-syndromemyalgic-encephalomyelitis-2155-9929 Rss Feed Rss Feed
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 1000+ Global Events inclusive of 300+ Conferences, 500+ Upcoming and Previous Symposiums and
Workshops on Pharma, Medicine, Science and Technology
Research Article Open Access
Immune Abnormalities in Patients Meeting New Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis
1School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
2The National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia
Brenu EW1,2*
, 1School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
2The National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia
Johnston S1,2
, 1School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
2The National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia
Hardcastle SL1,2
, 1School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
2The National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia
Huth TK1,2
, 1School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
2The National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia
Fuller K1,2
, 1School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
2The National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia
Ramos SB1,2
, 2The National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia
3Queensland Health, Gold Coast Public Health Unit, Robina, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Staines DR2,3
and 1School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
2The National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia
Marshall-Gradisnik SM1,2
Corresponding Author : Ekua Weba Brenu
Griffith University, Griffith Health Centre
National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases
Queensland, Australia 4222
Tel: +61 7 5678 0725
E-mail: e.brenu@griffith.edu.au
Received October 24, 2013; Accepted November 12, 2013; Published November 14, 2013
Citation: Brenu EW, Johnston S, Hardcastle SL, Huth TK, Fuller K, et al. (2013) Immune Abnormalities in Patients Meeting New Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. J Mol Biomark Diagn 4:152. doi: 10.4172/2155-9929.1000152
Copyright: © 2013 Brenu EW, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google
Visit for more related articles at
DownloadJournal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis

Background: Immunological abnormalities have been identified in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis patients fulfilling the 1994 Centers for Disease Control diagnostic criteria. Significant developments have been made to diagnostic criteria, but potential immunological markers have not been assessed in patients fulfilling these latest clinical requirements. Therefore, this study evaluated immunological parameters in patients that also fulfill the latest diagnostic criteria available known as the International Consensus Criteria.

Methods: The Immunological investigations including Natural Killer cell activity and phenotyping studies for dendritic cells, neutrophils, B cells and regulatory T cells were performed on whole blood samples collected from all participants using flow cytometric protocols. The physical functioning of all participants was also evaluated using scores from the Short Form Health Survey, and the World Health Organization Disability Adjustment Schedule. Results were compared according 1994 Centers of Disease Control and Prevention defined patients, and International Consensus Criteria defined patients, and healthy controls.

Results: Natural killer cell activity was consistently and significantly decreased, and regulatory T cells were significantly increased in both patient groups compared to healthy controls. Differences were found in human neutraphil antigens and expression of natural killer cell receptors between patient groups. Highly significant correlations were also found between physical status and some immune parameters in International Consensus Criteria defined patients.

Conclusion: This preliminary investigation on different diagnostic criteria suggests that the International Consensus Criteria may be more effective a detecting salient differences in the immune system.

Chronic fatigue syndrome; Myalgic encephalomyelitis; Diagnosis; Immunology; Physical functioning
CDC: Centres for Disease Control and Prevention; CFS: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; HNA: Human Neutrophil Antigen; KIR: Killer Immunoglobulin Receptor; NK: Natural Killer; Tregs: Regulatory T cells; WHO DAS 2.0: World Health Organization Disability Adjustment Schedule 2.0; ICC: International Consensus Criteria; ME: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis; SF-36: Short Form Health Survey
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, also referred to as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) encompasses a range of symptoms in response to unknown agents and physiological processes. In clinical research settings, CFS/ME has been defined according to an array of different diagnostic criteria that include the 1988 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1994 CDC, Australian, British, 2003 Canadian Consensus, and 2011 International Consensus Criteria (ICC) [1-6]. The 1994 CDC has been the most extensively used, and requires the presence of a chronic, debilitating fatigue for 6 months and at least four of following eight symptoms: post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep, muscle pain, joint pain, headaches, sore throat and tender lymph nodes. In contrast, the ICC categorises symptoms according to postexertional fatigue, and dysfunction of the neurological, immunological, autonomic and metabolic systems. Accordingly, patients are required to fulfill required number of symptoms from each category. This new criteria allows for a more holistic investigation of CFS/ME, where patients exhibit unique combinations of symptoms that result in mild to severe impairment in physical functioning.
This latest criteria was introduced to incorporate the increasing evidence on physiological impairment that has been demonstrated in CFS/ME. A particularly consistent finding in CFS/ME is found in the immunological system, as Natural Killer (NK) cell activity has been identified as an important marker that is significantly reduced across all patients [7]. Increases in regulatory T cells (Tregs) have also been reported, while cytokines remain controversial. These findings to date however have largely been based on patients defined according to 1994 CDC criteria. The symptom requirements of the 1994 CDC are considered broadly inclusive, which may increase the likelihood of clinically heterogeneous patient sets [8,9]. This can be a specific source of variability in immunological findings in CFS/ME. The more specific requirements of the ICC however, may select patients that are less clinically diverse. This could improve detection of immunological abnormalities, as well consistency across research. Previously, greater impairment in physical functioning has been identified in ICC patients in comparison to 1994 CDC [10,11]. As ICC patients represent a distinct clinical group, it is important to assess whether immunological anomalies previously identified in CFS/ME are present.
Hence, the purpose of this investigation was to compare immunological parameters of CFS/ME patients that fulfill the 1994 CDC and ICC criteria, and determine if certain criteria may be more effective at identifying salient abnormalities in comparison to healthy controls. An important question regards the significance of immunological parameters in relation to physical function. This study therefore, also investigated whether significant correlations were found between measures of immune and physical status.
The study recruited 63 participants of which 41 were CFS/ME patients and 22 were healthy controls. Participants were recruited from South East Queensland from the National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases database of patients diagnosed with CFS/ME. An independent researcher who was not involved in the laboratory experiments administered written consent forms and a questionnaire to be completed before blood collection. The questionnaire included a symptom checklist to ascertain diagnostic criteria CFS/ME, and also screened for exclusionary conditions that included autoimmune disorders, psychosis, epilepsy, cardiac related disorders, smoking, pregnancy or breastfeeding. To be confirmed as a CFS/ME patient, their reported symptoms had to comply with the 1994 CDC criteria or ICC.
Patients that only met the 1994 CDC criteria were classified as 1994 CDC. Patients fulfilling the ICC were also found to meet the 1994 CDC requirements, but were classified as ICC patients. CFS/ME patients that did not meet either criteria, or had exclusionary conditions were not included in the study. Healthy controls were defined as those with no symptoms of CFS/ME and no exclusionary conditions. Approval for this study was obtained from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee. The code of practice for this study adhered to the ethical guidelines outlined in the 1975 Declaration of Helenski.
Evaluation of physical functioning
Prior to blood collection, all participants completed self-reporting measures of their health according to the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) [12], and the World Health Organization Disability Adjustment Schedule (WHO DAS 2.0) [5,13]. The SF-36 and WHO DAS 2.0 provide scores for different aspects of physical and mental health; however analysis was confined to scores indicative of physical status only. Accordingly, the SF-36 score for Physical Functioning (PF), as well as the overall score for the physical health component of the survey, referred to as the Physical Component Summary (PCS) was calculated using ranges from 0 to 100, with lower values indicating greater impairment. The WHO DAS 2.0 score for Mobility (M) was calculated ranging from 0 to 100 was also used, however higher values indicate greater impairment.
Sample preparation
Researchers were blinded to the grouping of the participants. Whole blood samples were collected from all participants into EDTA and heparinised blood tubes. Routine assessment of blood characteristics were performed prior to all laboratory experiments. With the exception of NK cell phenotyping experiments whole blood was used for all phenotyping studies. For all flow cytometer experiments, the monoclonal antibodies were fluorescently labeled with fluorescein isothiocynate, phycoerythrin, allophycocyanin and peridinin chlorophyll, and analysis was performed on a four color flow cytometer.
Evaluation of NK cell activity
The activity of NK cells was measured using a well-known flow cytometeric method [14-16]. Briefly, isolated PBMCs (1×106 cells/ml) were stained with 0.4% PKH-26 fluorescent cell linker dye (Sigma- Aldrich, St Louis, MO). The target cells used were K562 tumour cells (1×105 cells/ml). The effector cells and the target cells were incubated at three effector to target ratios; 12.5: 1, 25:1 and 50:1 for four hours at 37°C. Control samples without PBMCs were also included to determine the number of cells that had undergone necrosis. Cells were stained with annexin V and 7-AAD (Becton Dickinson (BD) Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and analysed on the BD FACS Calibur flow cytometer. Percent lysis was calculated for each sample at the different ratios as described previously [14-16].
Assessment of cell phenotypes
Flurochrome conjugated monoclonal antibodies were used to determine the distribution of the phenotypes of the following cells, DCs (plasmacytoid (pDCs), myeloid (mDCs) and Cluster Of Differentiation (CD) 16+ DCs), NK cells (CD56dim and CD56bright), B cells (immature, memory and plasma) and Tregs. Cells were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies CD3, CD19, CD21, CD20, CD27, CD16, CD11c, CD62L, CD127, CD4, CD25, CD73, CD39, CD56, CD38, CD138 and CD10 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). Absolute counts for each cell subset were calculated from percentage of gated events on the flow cytometer and absolute WBCs numbers from haematological counts [17]. To determine the expression of various types of Human Neutrophil Antigen (HNA), samples were labeled with a combination of the following antibodies HNA-1 (CD16b), HNA-2 (CD177), HNA-4 (CD11b) and HNA-5 (CD11a).
Intracellular staining of functional proteins
NK lytic proteins and FOXP3 levels was assessed via intracellular staining [18]. Isolated PBMCs (1×107cells/ml) were labelled with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies CD56, CD16 and CD3; CD25, CD127 and CD4 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) for the seclusion of NK cells and Tregs from whole blood samples. Samples were then fixed and permeablised with BD Cytofix (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and diluted perm wash buffer (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) respectively. Cells were then stained with perforin, granzyme A (GZA), granzyme B (GZB) or FOXP3 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and analysed on the flow cytometer.
Examination of killer immunoglobulin receptor (KIRs) on isolated NK cells
The expression of KIR receptors on the surfaces of NK cells was determined on isolated NK cells. Briefly, Rosettesep (Stemcells Inc, Germany) was added to whole blood samples to preferentially label all other cells with the exception of NK cells. Blood samples were then diluted in PBS and layered over ficoll hypaque. Following isolation, NK cells were stained with monoclonal antibodies including CD3, CD16, CD56, CD158a/h (KIR2DL1/S1), CD158e (KIR3DL1), CD158b (KIR2DL2/DL3), CD158i (KIR2DS4) (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Glabach, Germany) and NKG2D (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) [19]. Subsequently, samples were analysed on the flow cytometer.
Statistical analysis
SPSS v.22 was used determine whether differences in immunological parameters between the 1994 CDC patient, ICC patient, and healthy control subgroups using independent t-testing with a significance at p<0.05. To compare the relationship between immunological parameters and mean physical functioning scores for three independent groups: 1994 CDC cases, ICC cases, and healthy controls, using Spearman’s correlation. Results of correlation were only considered significant at the p<0.001 level.
Diagnoses based on the 1994 CDC and ICC
Of 41 CFS/ME patients recruited, 17 were classified as 1994 CDC, 18 were classified as ICC, and 5 did not meet inclusion criteria. All 22 healthy controls met the study inclusion criteria. Mean age was similar of 50.7, 49.3, and 49.7 years for 1994 CDC, ICC, healthy controls, respectively. 1994 CDC and ICC patients also shared a similar duration of illness of 19 years.
NK cell activity
In both 1994 CDC and ICC patients, NK cell activity was significantly reduced in comparison to healthy controls. Measures of NK cell lytic proteins did not yield any significance difference between the groups (Figure 1).
Tregs and neutrophil antigens
A significant increase in Tregs was observed in both 1994 CDC and ICC patients in comparison to healthy controls (Figure 2). Further, a significant decrease in CD39+ Tregs was observed in 1994 CDC patients in comparison to healthy controls. No Significant differences were observed in B cells, NK cells and DC phenotypes. HNA2 (CD177- ) were significantly increased in 1994 CDC patients while HNA2 (CD177+) were significantly reduced in ICC patients in comparison to healthy controls (Figure 3). HNA5 was higher in 1994 CDC patients in comparison to ICC patients.
NK KIR receptors
Overall the expression of KIR receptors and NKG2D was higher in ICC patients in comparison with 1994 CDC patients. The ICC patients indicated significant elevations in the expression of KIR2DL1, KIR3DL1 and NKG2D compared to the 1994 CDC patients. KIR2DL2 was also significantly higher in ICC patients (Figure 4).
Correlation between immunological parameters with physical functioning
The results of significant correlation between immunological parameters with mean PCS, PF and M scores are shown in Table 1. Among healthy controls, higher PCS scores were significantly associated with higher NK cell activity. Among ICC patients, lower CD39+ Tregs was associated with lower PCS and PF scores on the SF-36 and higher mobility scores on the WHO DAS 2.0. A lower number of NK cells lacking KIR3DL1 scores were also associated with higher PCS scores and a higher expression of KIR2DS4 receptors. No significant associations at the p<0.001 level were detected among 1994 CDC patients.
This is the first study to examine whether immunological differences may be found among patients fulfilling different diagnostic criteria for CFS/ME, according to the 1994 CDC and ICC. The findings indicate that the ICC is invaluable in identifying immunological differences that have consistently been shown to be decreased in CFS/ME patients diagnosed with the 1994 CDC. The ICC is able to determine additional differences within immunological parameters that were not previously observed in 1994 CDC cases. In the present study, NK cell cytotoxic activity and HNA2 (CD177+) expression were profoundly reduced, while Tregs and CD39+ Tregs were increased in the CFS/ME cases. Only HNA5 was significantly increased in the ICC group in comparison to the 1994 CDC group. These findings are highly suggestive of a need to incorporate both the 1994 CDC and ICC in future clinical research as it may allow for the identification of subgroups.
To date, the only available diagnostic tools for CFS/ME are symptom based criteria such as the 1994 CDC, and ICC. Universal consent on experimental findings and usage of these criteria may achieve and likely improve the efficiency of producing clinical measurable diagnostic markers in the future. NK cell activity is a promising candidate for CFS/ME diagnostic marker. A global impairment in NK activity has consistently been observed in CFS/ME patients [7,15,16,19,20]. This suggests an inability of the NK cells in CFS/ME patients to clear viral and other microbial infections and also a prevalence of recurring viral infections. NK cells are essential to initial response to viruses and clearance of activated macrophages and autoreactive T cells [21]. Deficiencies in NK activity have been proposed to be secondary to alterations in perforin and granzymes, mediators of cytotoxic activity [16,20]. In the present study, reduced NK activity was not correlated with alterations in lytic proteins as these were not statistically different from the healthy controls. This may likely be attributed to the limitations of the statistical power due to the numbers of participants enrolled in the study.
In a recent study, NK cell KIR receptors were observed to be significantly different in CFS/ME with moderate and severe symptoms [19]. Similarly, in the present study, when patients were categorized as 1994 CDC and ICC, marked differences were noticed in the expression of NK receptors. Specifically, in the ICC group profound increases were observed in KIR2DL1, KIR3DL1 and NKG2D in contrast to the 1994 CDC group. KIR2DL1 and KIR3DL1 are inhibitory receptors while NKG2D is an activating receptor, these receptors inhibit and activate NK cytotoxic activity respectively [22-25]. An increase in inhibitory receptors in the ICC group may account for the reduced cytotoxic activity. Blocking inhibitory receptors such as KIR2DL1 has been shown to enrich NK cytotoxic activity cancer cell lines [26]. Pronounced expression of KIR3DL1 has been associated with the presentation of certain alleles including KIR3DL1*001,002,003 and 008 while low levels are recognized in individuals expressing KIR3DL1*004,005,006 and 007 alleles [27].
It is therefore possible to speculate that the CFS/ME patients in this study, especially those belonging to the ICC group may have expressed higher frequencies of certain KIR alleles, increasing the levels of inhibition on cytotoxic activity and depressing their ability to effectively clear infections. Hence, the ICC may be useful in predicting subgroups of patients based on certain molecular markers and this may be important in the clinical diagnosis of CFS/ME. This is the first time an increase in NKG2D receptors have been reported in CFS/ME patients. In an attempt to restore balance between activating and inhibitory signals, this may likely have ensued to counteract the overwhelming inhibitory signals emanating from the KIR2DL1 and KIR3DL1 [28]. These findings presuppose that differing mechanisms may be responsible for reduced cytotoxic activity in CFS/ME patients.
Increased Tregs is emerging as an important marker of CFS/ME. To date recent studies have indicated abnormal elevations of Tregs in CFS/ ME patients in comparison to healthy controls [16,29]. Most of these Tregs expressed the transcription factor Foxp3. This Treg dysfunction may be an added factor that limits the magnitude of NK activity further weakening the already diminished cytotoxic activity in CFS/ME. The abnormal levels of Tregs did not differ between the two cases of CFS/ ME. Interestingly, in the 1994 CDC cohort increased levels of Tregs occurred in conjunction with an overwhelmingly decrease in CD39. CD39 is known to convert extracellular ATP into AMP and its decrease may cause exacerbations in pro-inflammatory immune responses [30] and consequently T cell responses [31]. It is not known whether these effects occur in CFS/ME patients.
Previous findings have alluded to increased levels of CD73 in CFS/ ME patients diagnosed using the 1994 CDC criteria [32], in the current study a clear increased in CD73 was observed in both groups but this did not achieve statistical significance. CD73 converts AMP to adenosine, regulating the immune response [33]. Abnormal levels in these parameters may alter inflammatory reactions in the CFS/ME patients altering the extent of Treg suppression of other immune cells and immune processes [31]. Neutrophil dysfunction has received limited investigation is CFS/ME. Ultimately, perceived decreases in neutrophil respiratory burst and differential expression in HNA antigens highlight substantial deficits in the neutrophil function [15,32].
An important question remains on the relationship between immunological perturbations and physical functioning. This study examined whether these associations could be identified, using simple, validated measures of physical status [34-37] and is the first to examine this using these immune parameters. Among healthy controls, lower NK cell activity was associated with poorer physical status. Though this was not observed among CFS/ME patients, the findings to support that lower NK cell activity in general may be a sign of poor health. As CFS/ ME patients are shown to have significantly lower NK cell activity than healthy controls, this may continue to be a reliable indicator of their illness.
No strong associations were observed among 1994 CDC patients however, several were found among ICC patients. Though CD39+ was shown to be significantly decreased among 1994 CDC patients, it was not indicative of this groups physical status. Interestingly, decreased CD39+ was strongly associated with poorer physical health across all scores used in this study among ICC patients. Significantly increased KIR3DL1 and decreased KIR3Dl1 among ICC patients were also strongly associated with poorer physical health scores. These findings may be reflective of the groups poorer physical status overall. In previous investigations, ICC patients have been identified as an important subgroup within CFS/ME with greater impairment according to the scores used in this study [10,11].
On the basis of this present study the features that distinguish patients selected using the ICC from the 1994 CDC are KIR receptors and HNA5. It is not clear why CD39 was reduced in the 1994 CDC group in relation to healthy controls. The absence of changes in other cell phenotypes and markers assessed in this study may be related to the heterogeneity of the CFS/ME. This also indicates that CFS/ME is not necessarily associated with irregular distribution of lymphocyte subtypes but rather deregulation of intricate functional capacities of these immune lymphocytes. It is important to consider in the interpretation of the findings that a relationship between immunological parameters and physical health does not imply causality but supports the hypothesis that some CFS/ME patients have an underlying immune mechanism contributing to their illness. Since not all CFS/ME patients have identifiable immune abnormalities, and it may be useful in future assessment to differentiate subgroups of patients according to more specific clinical presentations such as symptom clusters, severity, frequency and duration of illness. Though not possible with the current participant numbers, this approach may serve to decrease heterogeneity observed in this illness. Further research is therefore needed to establish the significance of these immunological abnormalities and the influence of further clinical measures, which will aid in future diagnosis of this illness.
This research was funded and supported by the Mason Foundation (grant number 43120) and the Alison Hunter Memorial Foundation (grant number HF 201).



 Download    pdf version of this article


Tables at a glance

Table 1

Figures at a glance

Figure 1  Figure 2  Figure 3  Figure 4
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Relevant Topics
Disc Anxiety Medicine
Disc Bioactive Compound
Disc Biology of Cancer
Disc Biomarkers in Clinical Trials
Disc Biomarkers in Oncology
Disc Bipolar Medicine
Disc Cancer Progression and Diagnostics
Disc Cellular Medicine
Disc DNA Replication
Disc Depression Medicine
Disc Diabetic Medicine
Disc Diagnosis of Tuberculosis
Disc Diagnostic Therapeutics
Disc Disease Diagnosis
Disc Epigenomics
Disc Ethics in genetic engineering
Disc Evolutionary Biology
Disc Functional Genomics
Disc Gene Therapy
Disc Gene cloning
Disc Genetic Diagnosis
Disc Genetic Diagnostics
Disc Genetic Engineering in Medicine
Disc Genetic Probes
Disc Genetic Screening
Disc Genetic Testing
Disc Genetic engineering application
Disc Genetic engineering crops
Disc Genetic linkage analysis
Disc Genetically engineered animals
Disc Genetically engineering foods
Disc Genomic Medicine
Disc Genomics in Infectious Diseases
Disc Green genetic engineering
Disc Human Biology
Disc Human Molecular Genetics
Disc Human genetic engineering
Disc In vitro Diagnostics
Disc Insulin genetics
Disc Mass Spectrometry Based Quantitative Metabolomics
Disc Medicinal Biotechnology
Disc Metabolomics
Disc Molecular Basis of Cancer
Disc Molecular Basis of Obesity
Disc Molecular Biomarkers
Disc Molecular Diagnosis
Disc Molecular Diagnostic Market
Disc Molecular Diagnostics
Disc Molecular Forensics
Disc Molecular Genetic Test
Disc Molecular Medicine
Disc Molecular Tools for Earlier Diagnosis
Disc Multi Parametric Molecular Diagnostics
Disc Nuclear Medicine
Disc Oxidative Stress Biomarkers
Disc Pathology Diagnosis
Disc Pathology and Molecular Medicine
Disc Personalized Medicine
Disc RNA Splicing
Disc Recombinant DNA
Disc Salivary Biomarkers
Disc Serum Biomarkers
Disc Trans-Genesis
Disc Tumour Biomarkers
Disc Virus Diagnosis
Related Journals
Disc Genetic Engineering Journal
Disc Advances in Molecular Diagnostics
Disc Biology and Medicine Journal
Disc Molecular & Genetic Medicine Journal
Disc Molecular and Genetic Journal
Related Conferences
Disc 2nd Synthetic Biology Conference
Aug 15-17, 2016 London, UK
Disc 5th Computational Systems Biology Conference
Aug 22-23, 2016 Philadelphia, USA
Disc Cancer Biomarkers Conference
Sept 15-17, 2016 Berlin, Germany
Disc 7th Biomarkers and Research Conference
Oct 31-Nov 02, 2016 Baltimore, USA
Disc Clinical and Molecular Genetics Conference
Nov 28-30, 2016 Chicago, USA
Article Tools
Disc Export citation
Disc Share/Blog this article

Post your comment

Your question:
Anti Spam Code:
  Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

OMICS International Conferences 2015-16

Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 1000+ Global Annual Meetings
Conferences By Country
  USA   Spain   Poland
  Australia   Canada   Austria
  UAE   Switzerland   Turkey
  Italy   France   Finland
  Germany   India   Ukraine
  UK   Malaysia   Denmark
  Japan   Singapore   Mexico
  Brazil   South Africa   Norway
  South Korea   New Zealand   China
  Netherlands   Philippines
Medical & Clinical Conferences
Microbiology Oncology & Cancer
Diabetes & Endocrinology Cardiology
Nursing Dentistry
Healthcare Management Physical Therapy Rehabilitation
Neuroscience Psychiatry
Immunology Infectious Diseases
Gastroenterology Medical Ethics & Health Policies
Genetics & Molecular Biology Palliativecare
Pathology Reproductive Medicine & Women Healthcare
Alternative Healthcare Surgery
Pediatrics Radiology
Conferences by Subject
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Pharma Marketing & Industry
Environmental Science
Physics & Materials Science
EEE & Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Business Management
Geology & Earth science
©2008-2015 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version