ISSN: 0974-276X
Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Reveals Differential Phosphorylation of Cell Adhesion, Cell Junction and Structural Proteins

Weidong Zhou1*, Michela Capello2,3, Claudia Fredolini1,2,3, Leda Racanicchi4, Lorenzo Piemonti4, Lance A. Liotta1, Francesco Novelli2,3 and Emanuel F. Petricoin1
1Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia 20110, USA
2Center for Experimental Research and Medical Studies, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Turin 10126, Italy
3Department of Medicine and Experimental Oncology, University of Turin, Turin 10125, Italy
4Diabetes Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano 20132, Italy
Corresponding Author : Dr. Weidong Zhou
Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine
George Mason University, 10900 University Blvd, MS 1A9
Manassas, VA 20110, USA
Tel: 703-993-9492
Fax: 703-993-4288
E-mail: wzhou@gmu.edu
Received August 04, 2011; Accepted September 13, 2011; Published September 21, 2011
Citation: Zhou W, Capello M, Fredolini C, Racanicchi L, Piemonti L, et al. (2011) Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Reveals Differential Phosphorylation of Cell Adhesion, Cell Junction and Structural Proteins. J Proteomics Bioinform 4:170-178. doi:10.4172/jpb.1000186
Copyright: © 2011 Zhou W, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Related article at
DownloadPubmed DownloadScholar Google

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Abstract

In this present work, we characterized the phosphoproteomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells and normal pancreatic duct cells by mass spectrometry using LTQ-Orbitrap. We identified more than 700 phosphoproteins from each sample, and revealed differential phosphorylation of many proteins involved in cell adhesion, cell junction, and cytoskeleton. Since post-translational phosphorylation is a common and important mechanism of acute and reversible regulation of protein function in mammalian cells, an understanding of differential phosphorylation of these proteins and resulting signal transduction changes in PDAC will help in comprehending the complex dynamics of tumor invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer.

Keywords
Mass spectrometry; LTQ-Orbitrap; phosphoproteomics; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Cell adhesion; Cell junction; Cytoskeleton
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States and Europe. The absence of early symptoms or clinicalpathological markers results in diagnosis at a late, inoperable stage in more than 80% of cases. Most patients die within 12 months and only 4% survive for 5 years after diagnosis [1,2]. In the past decade, various mass spectrometry-based approaches have been applied to investigate the proteomes of diseased and normal samples from pancreatic tissues, juice, cell lines, and serum, with the goals of dissecting the abnormal signaling pathways underlying oncogenesis and identifying new biomarkers [3-13]; however, the description of the content of phosphoproteins in pancreatic cancer cells were limited. Since this information archive represents many of the new drug targets for kinase-based inhibitors, it is of critical importance to characterize this molecular information source.
Post-translational phosphorylation is a common and important mechanism of acute and reversible regulation of protein function in mammalian cells, and largely controls cellular signaling events that orchestrate biological functions. In humans, approximately 2% of the genome codes for kinases and phosphatases (there are ~500 kinases and 100 phosphatases in humans) [14]. A large number of oncogene products have protein kinase activity and are themselves substrates for protein kinases and phosphatases. Studies of mammalian cells metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate suggest that as many as one-third of all cellular proteins are covalently modified by phosphorylation [15,16]. At physiological pH, the side chains of Ser/ Thr/Tyr are not charged, and phosphorylation of Ser/Thr/Tyr will introduce negative charge to these amino acid residues. Consequently, protein phosphorylation can affect catalytic activity, localization of a protein in the cell, protein stability, and the ability of a protein to dimerize or form a stable complex with other molecules. Protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation function together in signal transduction pathways to induce rapid changes in response to hormones, growth factors, and neurotransmitters [17]. Thus, global characterization of the phosphoproteome is essential for a systematic understanding of cellular behavior of pancreatic cancer cells.
Today, high sensitive reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled nanospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the most commonly used technique for large-scale protein identification and global profiling of post-translational modifications from complex biological mixtures [18-21]. Due to the low stoichiometry of most phosphorylated proteins, enrichment of phosphopeptides by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC), or titanium dioxide (TiO2) chromatography, is advantageous or required before MS analysis in order to detect and measure such low abundance analytes [22]. In an effort to systematically reveal phosphoproteins in pancreatic cancer, particularly focusing on the proteins involved in cell adhesion, cell junction, and cytoskeleton, we performed phosphoproteomic analysis of TiO2-enriched phosphopeptides from PDAC cells and normal pancreatic duct cells by LC-MS/MS, and identified a large number of proteins with differential phosphorylation, which can serve as a launch-point for further exploration and analysis to understand tumor invasion and metastasis.
Materials and Methods
Sample preparation
CFPAC-1 cells (metastatic cell line derived from PDAC patients, ECACC ref. No: 91112501) were cultured at 37°C in Dulbecco modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen) supplemented with 20 mM glutamine, 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), and 40 μg/mL Gentamycin with humidified 5% CO2. The cells were harvested and washed with Hank’s balanced salt solution (Sigma-Aldrich). The cell pellet was freeze-dried overnight and stored at -80°C until use. Normal human pancreatic duct cells were obtained by primary culture of pancreatic duct from a single brain death donor under IRB approval (San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Italy) based on the published method [23]. Through a period of suspension culture, epithelial cells were enriched while stromal components were reduced to less than 1%, confirmed by FACS analysis with markers for epithelial (ESA, Ca19.9) and fibroblast (CD73, CD105, CD90) phenotype. The CFPAC-1 cells and normal duct cells were resuspended for 1 hour in lysis buffer consisting of Tris/HCl (50mM, pH 7.4), NaCl (150 mM), Triton X-100 (0.5% w/v), NP-40 (0.5% w/v), 80 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 10 μL/mL protease inhibitor cocktails (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM Na3VO4 and PhosStop phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche), sonicated for 30 s, and centrifuged at 16,000× g for 10 min. The supernatants were precipitated with 4 volume of acetone (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at -20°C and centrifuged at 9,000× g for 5 min. The pellets were dried by lyophylization (Heto, Dry Winner) for 2 hours.
Trypsin digestion and desalting
The cell pellets were resuspended in 200 μL of 8 M urea, and the protein concentration was measured by Bradford Assay (BioRad). The proteins were transferred to a 1.5-mL eppendorf tube, reduced by 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 30 min at 37°C, and then alkylated by 50 mM iodoacetamide for 20 min at room temperature. The concentrated urea in the sample was diluted to a final concentration of 2 M, and the proteins were digested by trypsin at 37°C for 6 h in a buffer containing ammonium bicarbonate (50 mM, pH 9). The digestion mixture was then acidified by adding glacial acetic acid to a final concentration of 2% and desalted by SepPak C18 column (Waters).
TiO2 enrichment of phosphopeptides
Phosphopeptides were enriched from the desalted 1 mg tryptic peptides using TiO2 column (200 μm × 2 cm) packed in-house [24]. 100 fmol of standard phosphopeptide angiotensin II phosphate (Ang II-Phos) was added to the SepPak-cleaned sample. The sample was then mixed with an equal volume of Loading Buffer (200 mg/mL DHB, 5% TFA, 80% acetonitrile), and loaded into the TiO2 column using the Pressure Cell (Brechbühler Inc.) with flow rate of 3 μL/min. The column was washed by 200 μL of Wash Buffer 1 (40 mg/mL DHB, 2% TFA, 80% acetonitrile) and 2 × 200 μL of a second Wash Buffer 2 (2% TFA, 50% acetonitrile) to remove non-phosphopeptides. Phosphopeptides were eluted from the column with the Elution Buffer (5% ammonia solution). Ammonia in the eluate was removed by lyophilization (~3 min), and the sample was acidified by adding glacial acetic acid to a final concentration of 2%, and desalted by ZipTip (Millipore).
Mass spectrometry for phosphopeptides identification
The purified phosphopeptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using an LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). LTQ-Orbitrap provides high accuracy mass measurement that is essential for the validation of modified peptide identifications and the reduction of false positive identifications. The reversed-phase LC column was slurry-packed in-house with 5 μm, 200 Å pore size C18 resin (Michrom BioResources, CA) in a 100 μm i.d. × 10 cm long piece of fused silica capillary (Polymicro Technologies, Phoenix, AZ) with a laser-pulled tip. After packing, the new column, the HPLC system (Surveyor MS Pump Plus from ThermoFisher) and the LTQ-Orbitrap, were tested by analyzing 100 fmol “Yeast Enolase Standard & Tryptic Digestion” from Michrom Bioresources, Inc. (catalogue number PTD/00001/46) to ensure that stable ESI, desired mass accuracy, peak resolution, peak intensity and retention time could be obtained. Additional iteration was performed to ensure reproducibility. 100 fmol of standard peptide angiotensin I (Ang I) were spiked into the sample as an internal standard. After sample injection, the column was washed for 5 min with mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid), and peptides were eluted using a linear gradient of 0% mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid, 80% acetonitrile) to 40% B in 120 min at 200 nL/min, then to 100% B in an additional 10 min. The HPLC gradient was shallower than that of general proteomic analysis since phosphopeptides are relative hydrophilic. Before and after analyzing one sample, the column was washed with HPLC mobile phase B for 30 min, then mobile phase A for 20 min at high flow rate (1 μL/min) to reduce potential carryover. The LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer was operated in a data-dependent mode in which each full MS scan (60,000 resolving power) was followed by eight MS/MS scans where the eight most abundant molecular ions were dynamically selected and fragmented in by collision-induced dissociation (CID) using a normalized collision energy of 35%. The fragmented ions were detected by LTQ. The Dynamic Exclusion Time was 30 s, and the Dynamic Exculsion Size was 200. The “FT master scan preview mode”, “Charge state screening”, “Monoisotopic precursor selection”, and “Charge state rejection” were enabled so that only the 1+, 2+, and 3+ ions were selected and fragmented by CID.
Mass spectrometry data analysis
Tandem mass spectra collected by Xcalibur (version 2.0.2) were searched against the NCBI human protein database (released in September 2009 with 37391 entries) using SEQUEST (Bioworks software from ThermoFisher, version 3.3.1) with full tryptic cleavage constraints, static cysteine alkylation by iodoacetamide, variable methionine oxidation, and variable phosphorylation of Ser/Thr/Tyr. Mass tolerance for precursor ions was 5 ppm and mass tolerance for fragment ions was 0.25 Da. The SEQUEST search results were filtered by criteria “Xcorr versus charge 1.8, 2.1, 3.0 for 1+, 2+, 3+ ions; ranked top #1; probability of randomized identification of peptide < 0.05”. Confident peptide identifications were determined using these stringent filter criteria for database match scoring followed by manual evaluation of the phosphorylation site assignment. The “false discovery rate (FDR)” was estimated by searching a combined forward-reversed database as described by Elias [25].
Results and Discussion
The same amounts of proteins (1 mg) from CFPAC-1 cells and normal duct cells were digested by trypsin and the enriched phosphopeptides were identified by LC-MS/MS using LTQ-Orbitrap. Common MS normalization was done in order to reduce extraneous variability. Both exogenous control (spiking standard peptide Ang I and Ang II-Phos) and internal controls (phosphopeptides from protein AHNAK nucleoprotein isoform 1) were utilized to ensure that desired mass accuracy , peak intensity, peak retention time, and reproducible chromatography could be obtained from the two samples (Figure 1). The SEQUEST search results were filtered by stringent criteria as described above and yielded 3011 mathced MS2 spectra from CFPAC-1 cells. Among these, 482 (16%) spectra were matched to non-phosphopeptides, and 2529 (84%) spectra were matched to phosphopeptides. A total of 1665 unique phosphopeptides was identified from 707 proteins with 1% FDR at phosphopeptide level. Similarly, the SEQUEST search results yielded 3076 matched MS2 spectra from normal duct cells. Among these, 523 (17%) spectra were matched to non-phosphopeptides, and 2553 (83%) spectra were matched to phosphopeptides. A total of 1572 unique phosphopeptides was identified from 736 proteins with 1% FDR at phosphopeptide level (Table 1). The MS result unveiled a large number of proteins with differential phosphorylation in CFPAC-1 and normal duct cells. Notably, many of these proteins are cell adhesion, cell junction and structural proteins.
Phosphorylation of cell adhesion proteins
Many cells bind to components of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Cell adhesion can occur either by focal adhesions, connecting the ECM to actin filaments of the cell, or by hemidesmosomes, connecting the ECM to intermediate filaments such as keratin. This cell-to-ECM adhesion is regulated by specific cell surface cellular adhesion molecules (CAMs) such as immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF), integrins, cadherins, and selectins. The integrins, heterodimers composed of alpha and beta subunits, are a family of heterophilic calciumindependent CAMs that bind IgSF CAMs or the extracellular matrix; the cadherins, named for calcium-dependent adhesion, are a family of homophilic CAMs including cadherins, protocadherins, desmogleins, and desmocollins. The dynamic assembly and disassembly of focal adhesions plays a central role in cell migration [26].
Here, 19 unique phosphopeptides were identified from integrin beta 4 isoform 3 in CFPAC-1 cells, whereas only 4 of these phosphopeptides were found from the protein in normal duct cells (Table 2, Figure 2). Separately, differential phosphorylation was also observed in proteins of protocadherin 1 isoform 1, desmoglein 2, tensin, zyxin, PTPRF interacting protein alpha 1 isoform b, and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (also named osteopontin) isoform a (Table 2, Supplementary information Table 1S). Tesin is a multi-domain protein localized to focal adhesions. It links actin filaments to integrin receptors, and functions as a platform for assembly of signaling complexes at focal adhesions by recruiting tyrosin-phosphorylated molecules [27,28]. Zyxin is a zincbinding phosphoprotein that concentrates at focal adhesions and along the actin cytoskeleton. Zyxin may function as a messenger in the signal transduction pathway that mediates adhesion-stimulated changes in gene expression and may modulate the cytoskeletal organization of actin bundles [29]. PTPRF interacting protein alpha 1 (short name of “Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type f polypeptide-interacting protein alpha-1”), also named Liprin-alpha-1, may regulate the disassembly of focal adhesions [30]. Osteopontin is an extracellular structural protein and an organic component of bone. It is also expressed in other tissues, and it is an integrin-binding phosphorylated glycoprotein, recognized as a key molecule in a multitude of biological processes such as bone mineralization, cell-matrix interaction, cancer metastasis, cell-mediated immune response, and inflammation [31,32].
Phosphorylation of cell junction proteins
Cell junctions are protein complexs that exist within the tissue of a multicellular organism, providing contact between neighbouring cells, between a cell and the ECM, or building up the paracellular barrier of epithelia to control the paracellular transport. In vertebrates, there are three major types of cell junctions ─ i.e., adherens junctions and desmosomes (Anchoring Junctions), gap junctions (Communicating Junctions), and tight junctions (Occluding Junctions). An adherens junction is defined as a cell junction whose cytoplasmic face is linked to the actin cytoskeleton, composed of cadherins and catenins. They can appear as bands encircling the cell (zonula adherens) or as spots of attachment to the ECM (adhesion plaques). Desmosomes attach the cell surface adhesion proteins to intracellular keratin cytoskeletal filaments, composed of desmoglein, desmocollin, desmoplakin, plakoglobin and plakophillin. Desmosomes help to resist shearing forces and are found in simple and stratified squamous epithelium and in muscle tissue as well. A gap junction directly connects the cytoplasm of two cells, which allows various molecules and ions to pass freely between cells. The gap junction hemichannels are primarily homo or hetero-hexamers of connecin proteins. Tight junctions are the closely associated areas of two cells whose membranes join together forming a branching network of sealing strands, composed of claudins and occludins to anchor the strands to the actin cytoskeleton. They help to maintain the polarity of cells and prevent the passage of molecules and ions through the space between cells [26].
Notably, less unique phosphopeptides were found from several cell junction proteins in CFPAC-1 cells (Tables 2 and 1S). Among these proteins, catenin beta 1, catenin delta 1 isoform 1ABC, catenin delta 1 isoform 1A, junction plakoglobin (gamma-catenin), and pleckstrin homology domain containing, family A member 7 are involved in adherens junctions [26,33]; plakophilin 2 isoform 2b, plakophilin 3, plakophilin 4 isoform a, desmoplakin isoform I are components of desmosomes; claudin 3, occludin, tight junction protein 3, and cingulin are associated with tight junctions [26,34]. Interestingly, in addition to their well-known roles, catenins have recently emerged as molecular sensors that integrate cell-cell junctions and cytoskeletal dynamics with signaling pathways that govern morphogenesis, tissue homeostasis, and intercellular communication [35].
Phosphorylation of cell structural proteins
The cytoskeleton provides the cell with structure and shape, and interacts extensively and intimately with cellular membranes. Eukaryotic cells contain three main kinds of cytoskeletal filaments, which are microfilaments, intermediate filaments, and microtubules. Microfilaments are the thinnest fibers of the cytoskeleton, approximately 6 nm in diameter. Each microfilament is made up of two helix, interlaced strands of actin subunits, and acts as a track for myosin motor motility. Many signal transduction systems use the actin cytoskeleton as a scaffold, holding them at or near the inner face of the peripheral membrane. Intermediate filaments, around 10 nanometers in diameter, organize the internal tridimensional structure of the cell, anchoring organelles and serving as structural components of the nuclear lamin and sarcomeres. They also participate in some cell-cell and cell-matrix junctions. Intermediate filaments are heterogeneous constituents of the cytoskeleton, made of vimentins, keratins, neurofilaments, and lamins. Microtubules are hollow cylinders about 23 nm in diameter, most commonly comprising 13 protofilaments which, in turn, are polymers of alpha and beta tubulin. They are commonly organized by the centrosome, and play key roles in the mitotic spindle and intracellular transport with the associated dyneins and kinesins [26]. In vivo microtubule dynamics vary considerably. Assembly, disassembly and catastrophe rate depend on which microtubuleassociated proteins (MAPs) are present. MAP-microtubule binding is regulated through MAP phosphorylation by microtubule-affinityregulating- kinase (MARK) [36].
As shown in Tables 2and 1S, differential phosphorylation of cytoskeleton proteins and their associated proteins was revealed. First, more unique phosphopeptides were identified from several microfilaments-interacting proteins such as myristoylated alaninerich protein kinase C substrate (MARCKS), drebrin 1 isoform a, phosphatase and actin regulator 4 isoform 1, whereas less unique phosphopeptides were identified from CDC42 effector protein 1 in CFPAC-1 cells. MARCKS is filamentous actin cross-linking protein, and it is the most prominent cellular substrate for protein kinase C. The protein is thought to be involved in cell motility, phagocytosis, membrane trafficking and mitogenesis [37]. Drebrin 1 is a cytoplasmic actin-binding protein thought to play a role in the process of neuronal growth [38,39]. CDC42 effector protein 1 has also been reported to be involved in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton [40]. Second, more unique phosphopeptides were identified from intermediate filament proteins such as nestin and nuclear lamin A/C isoform 1, whereas less unique phosphopeptides were identified from keratin 8, 18, 19, and 80 in CFPAC-1 cells. Third, 33 unique phosphopeptides were identified from microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP-1B) in CFPAC-1 cells, but none were found in normal duct cells, indicating that either MAP-1B was not phosphorylated or the phosphorylation level was too low to be detected in normal duct cells in this study. In contrast, 5 unique phosphopeptides were identified from microtubuleassociated protein 7 (MAP-7) in normal duct cells, but none were found in CFPAC-1 cells. Notably, some phosphorylation sites contain S/T-P motifs, indicating that mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) was likely involved in phosphorylation of MAPs [41]. MAP-7, also named Ensconsin, play an important role in reorganization of microtubules during polarization and differentiation of epithelial cells [42,43]. MAP- 1B is one of the major growth associated and cytoskeletal proteins in neuronal and glial cells. It is essential to stabilize microtubules during the elongation of dendrites and neuritis, and it can also interact with other cellular components, including filamentous actin and signaling proteins [44,45]. The functions of MAP-7 and MAP-1B are modulated by phosphorylation, and multiple phosphorylation sites have been previously identified in human cervix epithelial adenocarcinoma (Hela) cells by MS-based phosphoproteomic study [4649]. In addition, differential phosphorylation was observed in stathmin 1 isoform a and transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 isoform d (TACC2). Stathmin 1 has been characterized as an important regulatory protein of microtubule dynamics. It interacts with two molecules of dimeric α, β-tubulin to form a tight ternary complex call the T2S complex. When stathmin sequesters tubulin into the T2S complex, tubulin becomes non-polymerizable [50,51]. Protein TACC2 has been implicated to play a role in organizing centrosomal microtubules [52]. Lastly, our MS result revealed differential phosphorylation of several motor proteins and nuclear pore proteins such as nucleoporin 88 kDa, nucleoporin 153 kDa, and kinesin light chain 3.
The reversible phosphorylation of proteins regulates almost all aspects of cell life since it underpins the process of signal transduction, and abnormal phosphorylation is a cause or consequence of many diseases such as cancer. In the past decade, researchers successfully profiled the phosphoproteomes of various mammalian cells and tissues and were able to identify thousands of phosphopeptides from over a thousand phosphoproteins by MS [4649]. However, most of the reports have been focused on analysis of a single sample, and information of comparative phosphoproteomic studies of cancer and normal samples was limited. Here, we exploited TiO2-enrichment coupled to LC-MS/MS to identify the phosphoproteomes of PDAC cells and normal pancreatic duct cells, and qualitatively revealed differential phosphorylation from cell adhesion, cell junction and structural proteins. An understanding of composition and posttranslational modification of these proteins will certainly help in comprehending the complex dynamics of tumor invasion and metastasis in cancer biology. Furthermore, the identified phosphorylation sites can be used to map the signaling pathways that are involved in the regulation of these proteins and are potential targets for therapeutic development.
PDAC is characterized by a strong stromal presence, with 30–90% of tumor cells surrounded and interspersed by the fibroblastic stroma. As a result, some researchers used laser capture microdissection (LCM) to isolate enriched populations of cancer cells from the heterogeneous tissue specimen [3,11]. However, the phosphoproteomic analysis is limited by the relatively low number of cells that can be obtained from the capture for MS analysis and comparison. On the other hand, cell lines of PDAC are easily obtained, and the cultured cells are homogenous. In this study, we analyzed and compared a metastatic PDAC cell line with enriched normal duct cells obtained from primary culture of a tissue specimen. The cell line was used because of low yield of duct cells from primary culture of PDAC tissue. Although the proteins from cell lines are readily accessible and abundant enough for MS experiment, we need to keep in mind that data obtained with cell lines may not be representative of primary samples since the cell culture condition does not always reflect the tumor micro-environment. Thus, the preliminary findings from this comparison, as usual, require further investigations to determine their relevant roles in the PDAC cells in vivo, and validation of the differences observed. While our analysis was comprehensive, another limitation of our study is the potential for biological variability−since only 2 samples were compared, the extension of these results to more broad-based hypothesis is not possible. This is worthwhile for future work to analyze and compare different cell lines and normal duct cells from more human subjects in order to understand the significance of the findings to date.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by grants from the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC nr. 5548), Fondazione San Paolo (Special Project Oncology), Ministero della Salute: Progetto integrato Oncologia, Regione Piemonte: Ricerca Industriale e Sviluppo Precompetitivo (BIOPRO and ONCOPROT), Ricerca Industriale “Converging Technologies” (BIOTHER), Progetti strategici su tematiche di interesse regionale o sovra regionale (IMMONC), Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata, Ricerca Sanitaria Applicata, European Pancreatic Cancer-Tumour- Microenvironment Network (EPC-TM-Net, nr. 256974), and the College of Science at George Mason University.
References





















































Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
 
Share This Article
   
 
   
 
Relevant Topics
Disc Applications of Bioinformatics
Disc Bacterial transcriptome
Disc Bioinformatics Algorithms
Disc Bioinformatics Databases
Disc Bioinformatics Tools
Disc Cancer Pharmacogenomics
Disc Cancer Proteomics
Disc Clinical Pharmacogenomics
Disc Clinical Proteomics
Disc Cluster analysis
Disc Comparative genomics
Disc Comparative proteomics
Disc Comparative transcriptomics
Disc Computational drug design
Disc Current Proteomics
Disc Data algorithms
Disc Data mining applications in genomics
Disc Data mining applications in proteomics
Disc Data mining in drug discovery
Disc Data mining tools
Disc Data modelling and intellegence
Disc Data warehousing
Disc Drug Dosage Formulations
Disc Drug Toxicity and Efficacy
Disc Epigenetics
Disc Epigenomic studies
Disc Gene Expression profiling
Disc Gene polymorphism
Disc Genome annotation
Disc Genomic Targets
Disc Genomic data mining
Disc Genomic data warehousing
Disc Glycome
Disc Human Proteome Project Applications
Disc Immune Disorders
Disc Individualized Medicine
Disc Mapping of genomes
Disc Mass Spectrometry in Proteomics
Disc Meta genomics
Disc Metabolome
Disc Microarray
Disc Microarray Proteomics
Disc Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
Disc Mouse transcriptome
Disc Non coding MRNA
Disc Personalized Medicine Studies
Disc Pharmacoeconomics in Drug Development
Disc Pharmacogenetics
Disc Pharmacogenomic Biomarker
Disc Pharmacogenomics Applications
Disc Pharmacogenomics Future Medicine
Disc Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine
Disc Pharmacogenomics for Patient Care
Disc Pharmacoproteomics in Drug development
Disc Profiling
Disc Protein Sequence Analysis
Disc Protein engineering
Disc Proteogenomics
Disc Proteome
Disc Proteome Profiling
Disc Proteomic Analysis
Disc Proteomic Biomarkers
Disc Proteomics Clinical Applications
Disc Proteomics Research
Disc Proteomics Science
Disc Proteomics and Pharmacodynamics
Disc Proteomics data warehousing
Disc Python for Bioinformatics
Disc Quantitative Proteomics
Disc RNA sequencing
Disc RNA sequencing and analysis
Disc Sequencing
Disc Small RNA Sequencing
Disc Statistical data mining
Disc Transcripotme
Disc Transcriptional Attenuation
Disc Transcriptional Regulation
Disc Transcriptome analysis
Disc Translational Medicine
 
Recommended Journals
Disc Transcriptomics Journal
Disc Pharmacogenomics Journal
Disc Data Mining Journal
  View More»
 
Recommended Conferences
Disc 6th Bioinformatics Conference
August 22-23, 2016 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Disc 7th International Conference and Expo on Proteomics
October 24-26, 2016 Rome, Italy
View More»
 
Article Tools
Disc Export citation
Disc Share/Blog this article
 
Article usage
  Total views: 11135
  [From(publication date):
September-2011 - May 28, 2016]
  Breakdown by view type
  HTML page views : 7407
  PDF downloads :3728
 
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

 
OMICS International Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
 
 
OMICS International Conferences 2016-17
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings
 
 

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsinc.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2016 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version