|  Research Article | 
                  Open Access  | 
                 
                | 
             
            
              | Bioequivalence of Two Oral Fluconazole Formulations
                in Healthy Subjects: a Single Dose, Open-Label,
                Randomized, Two-Period Crossover Study | 
             
            
              | Jose Antonio Palma-Aguirre1*, Mireya Lopez-Gamboa1, Teresita
                de Jesus Castro-Sandoval1, Roxana Hernández-González1, Julian Mejía-Callejas1,
                María de los Angeles Melchor-Baltazar1, Juan Salvador Canales-Gomez2 | 
             
            
              | 1Centro de Estudios Científicos y Clínicos Pharma, SA de CV, Mexico City, Mexico | 
             
            
              | 2Productos Medix, SA de CV Mexico City, Mexico | 
             
            
            
            
              
                
                  | *Corresponding author: | 
                   Jose Antonio Palma-Aguirre, Amores 320, 
Col . Del Valle, 03100 Mexico City, Mexico,  
 E-mail: jpalma@cecycpharma.com | 
                 
                | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Received December 17, 2009; Accepted February 04, 2010; Published February 05, 2010 | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Citation: Palma-Aguirre JA, Mireya LG, de Jesus CST, Hernández-
                González R, Mejía-Callejas J, et al. (2010) Bioavailability of Two Oral
                Tablet Formulations of citalopram 20 mg: Single-Dose, Open-Label,
                Randomized, Two-Period Crossover Comparison in Healthy Mexican
                Adult Subjects. J Bioequiv Availab 2: 023-027. doi: 10.4172/jbb.1000026 | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Copyright: © 2010 Palma-Aguirre JA, et al. This is an open-access
                article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
                License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
                in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Abstract | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Background | 
             
            
              |  Fluconazole is a triazole antifungal agent
                labeled for use in the treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal
                candidiasis and cryptococcal meningitis, marketed
                in Mexico in several generic trade names. | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Objective | 
             
            
              | The aim of this study was to compare the
                bioavailability and determine the bioequivalence of one test
                formulation (fluconazole oral tablet) with its corresponding
                list reference-drug formulation in Mexico (a list issued
                by Mexican Health Authorities). | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Methods | 
             
            
              | A single dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period
                crossover, postmarketing study was conducted. Eligible
                subjects was selected comprising healthy Mexican
                adults of either sex, and subjects were randomly assigned
                to receive 1 test formulation of fluconazole followed by
                the corresponding reference drug formulation, or viceversa,
                with a 1-week washout period between doses. After a 12-
                hour (overnight) fast, subjects received a single capsule of
                fluconazole 150 mg tablet formulation. For the analysis of
                bioequivalence, including Cmax, AUC from time 0 (baseline)
                to time t (AUC0-t), and AUC from baseline to infinity
                (AUC0-∞), blood samples were collected at baseline, 0.5,
                1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after
                dosing. The formulation was considered bioequivalent if
                the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of the Cmax and
                AUC were within the predetermined range of 80% to
                125%. Tolerability was determined by clinical assessment,
                monitoring vital signs, laboratory analysis results, and subject
                interviews regarding adverse events. | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Results | 
             
            
              | A total of 24 subjects were enrolled in the study
                The bioequivalence test drug values were Cmax of 4.44 ±
                0.79 μg/mL, tmax of 2.59 ± 1.03 h, AUC0-t of 152.21 ± 28.89
                h. μg/mL, AUC0-∞ of 175.13 ± 48.98 h. μg/mL, and reference
                drug values of Cmax of 4.38 ± 0.83 μg/mL, tmax of 2.70
                ± 1.15 h, AUC0-t of 154.67 ± 26.10 r. μg/mL, AUC0-∞ of
                174.33 ± 31.10 hr. μg/mL. | 
             
            
              |   | 
             
            
              | Conclusions | 
             
            
              | In this study in healthy Mexican adult subjects,
                a single dose of fluconazole 150 mg of the test formulation
                was found to be bioequivalent to the corresponding
                reference formulation according to the regulatory definition
                of bioequivalence based on the rate and extent of
                absorption. Both formulations were generally well tolerated. | 
             
             
          
                     | 
        
          
            This Article  | 
           
          
            DOWNLOAD  | 
           
          
             | 
           
          
            Services  | 
           
          
             | 
           
          
            Google Scholar   | 
           
          
             | 
           
          
            Pub Med   | 
           
          
             | 
           
          |