PM PSD NSE Interval Correlationis0. NIG   p .271 .034 .0003 (.206, .340) π .364 .078 .0008 (.217, .521) IG p .460 .030 .0003 (.399,.518) π .726 .040 .0004 (.647,.801) Correlationis θ.         NIG   p .257 .033 .0003 (.190, .320) π .371 .079 .0008 (.217, .520) θ .026 .024 .0002 (.000, .074) IG      p .446 .030 .0003 (.390, .506) π .723 .040 .0004 (.643, .799) θ .015 .014 .0001 (.000, .044) Note: Parameters: p - segregation ratio; π - proband probability; θ - familial correlation.

Table 2: Comparison of ignorable (IG) and nonignorable (NIG) selection models by data set and parameters using the posterior mean (PM), posterior standard deviation (PSD), numerical standard error (NSE) and 95% credible interval for Crow’s data.