PDT responder

PDT non-responder

p-value

 

Age

73.1 ± 6.9

71.7 ± 7.9

0.41

Male/Female

55/12

20/6

0.57

*

GLD (mm)

3639 ± 1602

3959 ± 1624

0.39

Baseline BCVA logMAR

0.69 ± 0.33

0.60 ± 0.36

0.25

12M BCVA logMAR

0.51 ± 0.41

0.72 ± 0.39

0.028

BCVA change from baseline logMAR

-0.18 ± 0.37

0.12 ± 0.39

0.00098

No. of PDT performed (No. of eyes)

   1   (46)    2   (22)§

        1    ( 8) #         2    (12)##         3    ( 5)         4    ( 1) 

   

PDT frequency/year

1.3 ± 0.5

2.0 ± 0.8

0.000012

p-values are calculated by *Χ-square test or † two-tailed t-test GLD; greatest linear dimension, BCVA; best-corrected visual acuity, logMAR; logarithm of minimum angle resolution, PDT; photodynamic therapy §Six cases underwent additional PDT due to the development of recurrence or new lesion 5.5±2.0 months (mean±SD) after the complete regression with a single PDT #the cases ceased for the second PDT due to the increase of euxdative changes after the first PDT ##the cases who declined further treatment due to no effect
Table 1: Data summary of the participants stratified by the response to photodynamic therapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.