Target Timing Statistic   Performance Rating Source
Runoff Storm-by- storm   Poor Fair Good Very Good  
R2
NS
MRE
(%)
<0.61
<0.40
>± 30
0.62-
0.72
0.40-
0.55
± 20-
± 25
0.73
-0.81
0.55
-0.70
± 15-
± 20
0.82-1.00
0.70-1.00
<± 15
This study
This study
This study
Long-term R2
NS
MRE
(%)
0.52-
0.64
<0.50
>± 25
0.65-
0.76
0.50-
0.65
± 15-
± 25
0.77-
0.85
0.65
-0.75
± 10-
± 15
0.86-1.00
0.75-1.00
<± 10
Duda et al., [19]
Moriasi et al.,[13]
Duda et al.,[19];
Moriasi et al.,[13]
Sedimentload Storm-by- storm R2
NS
MRE
(%)
<0.50
<0.35
>± 35
0.50-
0.60
0.35-
0.47
± 30-
± 35
0.60-
0.75
0.47-
0.65
± 25-
± 30
0.75-1.00
0.65-1.00
<± 25
This study
This study
This study
Long-term R2
NS
MRE
(%)
<0.55
<0.50
>± 45
0.55-
0.65
0.50
-0.65
± 30-
± 45
0.65-
0.80
0.65-
0.75
± 20-
± 30
0.80-1.00
0.75-1.00
<± 20
This study
Moriasi et al.,[13]
Duda et al., [19]
Phosphorusload Storm-by- storm R2
NS
MRE
(%)
<0.40
<0.30
>± 35
0.40-
0.55
0.30-
0.45
± 30-
± 35
0.55-
0.70
0.45-
0.65
± 25-
± 30
0.70-1.00
0.65-1.00
<± 25
This study
This study
This study
Long-term R2
NS
MRE
(%)
<0.45
<0.40
>± 35
0.45-
0.65
0.40-
0.65
± 25-
± 35
0.65-
0.80
0.65-
0.75
± 15-
± 25
0.80-1.00
0.75-1.00
<± 15
This study
This study;
Moriasi et al.,[13]
Duda et al., [19]
Table 2: Model performance ratings by target.