Level of influence on failure (and numeric value):Percent of respondents
  None Minor Moderate Major Maximum Median Interquartile
Range
Factor*a (0) (1) (2)   (3) (4)  
Weight regainers              
Food offeringsb 2 (2.0,0) 2.9 (1.8,1.1) 7.3 (6.0,1.3) 35.4 (0.3,35.1) 52.4 (1.1,51.3) 4 1-4
Low calorie dietary recommendationsb 3.1 (2.4,0.7) 2.9 (1.8,1.1) 6.1 (5.5,0.6) 41.6 (0.4,41.4) 46.3 (1,45.3) 3 1-4
Lack of vigilance with regard to weight controlb 8.1 (7.0,1.1) 3.1 (1.8,1.3) 1.1 (1.0,0.1) 41.6 (0.4,41.1) 46.2 (1.0,45.2) 3 1-4
Use eating to regulatemood 4.3 (0.1,4.2) 2.9 (0.3,2.6) 0.8(0,0.8) 78.5 (8.4,70.2) 13.4 (2.4,11.0) 3 0-4
Lack of dietary              
preference 0.6 (0,0.6) 22.6 (2.4,20.2)   17.9(2.0,15.9)   55.5 (6.3,49.2) 3.5 (0.6,2.9)
Failure to achieve weight goalb 39.1 (4.4,34.7) 29.3 (2.9,26.4) 5.7 (2.1,3.6) 16(0.8,15.2) 9.9 (1.0,8.9) 1 3-4
Dissatisfaction with the weight achieved 34 (3.3,30.7) 20.2 (2.6,17.6)   9.2 (0.6,8.6) 35.8 (4.6,31.2) 0.7 (0,0.7)  
Weight losers              
Food offeringsb 0.3 (0.2,0.1) 48.1 (0.5,47.6) 44.5(11.2,33.4) 6.3(0.9,5.4)   0.7 (0.4,0.3) 2
Dissatisfaction with the weight achieved 0.8 (0.1,0.7) 33.1 (4.3,28.8) 30.4 (3.7,26.6) 6.5 (1.0,5.6) 29.2 (4.1,25.1) 2 3-4
Failure to achieve weight goalb 0.5 (0.2,0.3) 39.1 (0.6,38.5) 42.7 (10.5,32.2) 7.8 (1.0,6.9) 9.9 (0.9,8.9) 2 1-4
Lack of dietary preferences 4.6 (0.4,4.2) 64.8 (8.7,56.1) 20 (2.8,17.2) 6.2(0.7,5.6) 4.4 (0.6,3.7) 1 1-4
Use eating to regulate mood 22.4 (3.2,19.2) 57.6 (7.5,50.1) 11.2 (1.6,9.6) 7.1 (0.7,6.4) 1.7 (0.3,1.4) 1 0-4
Low calorie dietary              
recommendationsb 45.3(11.1,34.2) 47.2 (0.5,46.7) 0.6 (0,0.6) 6.6 (1.2,5.3) 0.4 (0.3,0.1) 1 1-4
Lack of vigilance with regard to weight controlb 44.7(11.2,33.5) 48.5 (0.8,47.7) 0.1 (0,0.1) 6.4 (1.2,5.2)   0.3 (0,0.3) 1
Data are percentages and as Total (M,F).
*In descending order of influence.
aThere were significant differences between two subgroups on all 7 factors (Mann-Whitney U, df = 2, p<0.0001).
bThere were significant differences between males and females in subgroups (Mann-Whitney U, test df = 2, p<0.0001).
There were significantly higher ratings for "food offerings" in the weight regainer group relative to the weight loss group (Mann-Whitney U, test df=2, p < 0.0001).
Table 2: Influence of factors impeding compliance with weight loss diet. Variables are percentages and parentheses indicate the male and female percentages.