Attitude to sickle cell disease

Intervention group

Control group

Intervention grp. vs control grp (post-intervention.)
p value

Pre – Interv.
n=218
Freq(%)

Post – interv.
n=216
Freq(%)

%
change

P value Pre – interv.
n=196
Freq(%)

Post - interv.
n=194
Freq(%)

%
change

P value

It's a major problem

 

148
(67.9)

 

186
(86.1)

 

18.2

 

0.000

 

125
(63.8)

 

126
(64.9)

 

1.1

 

0.638

 

0.000

 

Can exist in their families

98
(45)

121
(56)

11

0.04

79
(40.3)

80
(41.2)

0.9

0.968

0.011

Useful to know genotype

200
(91.7)

210
(98.1)

6.4

0.00

181
(92.3)

182
(93.8)

1.5

0.369

0.004

Partner can be a carrier

n= 45

n=43

 

 

N=30

N=23

 

 

 

 

5
(11.1)

20
(46.5)

35.4

0.000*

1
(3.3)

1
(4.3)

1

0.597*

0.000*

 

Possible to   have children with SCD

n=37

n=11

 

 

N=37

N=35

 

 

 

 

8
(21.6)

3
(27.3)

5.7

0.464*

2
(5.6)

5
(14.7)

9.1

0.294*

0.301*

Table 2: Effect of health education on respondents’ attitudes to sickle cell disease.