Articles Reason for exclusion
Al Yami et al. [23] Stability after orthodontic treatment, published before year 2005
Booth et al. [24] Wrong comparison (time point when retainer was lost was not stated)
Danz et al. [25] Wrong patient groups (data not extractable for different types of retainers)
Devreese et al. [26] Wrong outcome (case-series, no complications reported)
Freitas et al. [27] Wrong intervention and comparison (compares other interventions)
Johnsson et al. [28] Wrong intervention and comparison (compares two clinics)
Kuijpers et al. [29] Wrong outcome (studies occlusal wear)
Lagerström et al. [30] Wrong comparison (time point when retainer was lost was not stated)
Lagravere et al. [31] Wrong intervention (studies rapid maxillary expansion)
Lang et al. [32] Stability after orthodontic treatment, published before year 2005
Littlewood et al. [3] Same data as in Littlewood et al., 2006a
Maia et al. [33] Wrong outcome (case-series, no complications reported)
McNamara et al. [34] Wrong intervention (studies rapid maxillary expansion vs. no orthodontics)
Millet et al. [35] Wrong Intervention studied in systematic review
Morton and Pancherz [36] Wrong outcome (case-series, no complications reported)
Myser et al. [37] Case-series with too few patients (included 25 out of 66 eligible)
Renkema et al. [38] Data not extractable
Renkema et al. [39] Wrong outcome (case-series does not study complications)
Renkema et al. [40] Wrong intervention (does not study retainer)
Renkema et al. [41] Wrong intervention (does not study retainer)
Sari et al. [42] Wrong intervention (too short follow-up)
SBU [6] Data presented in Bondemark et al., 2007
Tofeldt et al. [43] Wrong intervention and comparison (compares two clinics)
Table 2: Excluded articles (alphabetically, with reasons for exclusion).