Author, year Country Study design Number
of patients (n)
With
drawals
-
dropouts
Result Comments
Intervention
Fixed retainer
Control
Removable retainer
 
Artun [11] USA RCT n=49 Group 1: n=11 Group 2: n=13 Group 3: n=11 Group 4: n=14 ?a No caries No caries Group 1=     Mandibular cuspid retainer .032 plain wire
Group 2=     Mandibular cuspid retainer .032 spiral wire
Group 3=     Mandibular 3-3 retainer .0205 flexible spiral wire
Group 4=     Removable lower retainer Cuspid retainer- bonded only to cuspids.
3-3 retainer- bonded to each tooth
Cerny [12] UK CT n=61 Group 1: n=46 Group 2: n=43 ?a No caries No caries Group 1= Permanent bonded retainer (PBR ) (upper or lower)
Group 2= Removable retainer (RR) Smokers and those >50 years were excluded from analysis.
Artun [14] Norway CT n=108 Group 1: n= 31 Group 2: n=18 Group 3: n=14 Group 4: n=20 (Group 5: n= 25) ?a No caries No caries Group 1= Mandibular cuspid retainer .032 spiral wire.
Group 2= Mandibular cuspid retainer .032 plain wire.
Group 3= Maxillary .0195 flexible spiral wire retainer.
Group 4= Maxillary retainer plate.
(Group 5= No retainer). Cuspid retainer = bonded only to cuspids.
3-3- retainer = bonded to each tooth.
aWithdrawals and drop-outs not explicitly stated. CT = non-randomised, controlled study. ns = not significant
Table 6: Fixed orthodontic retainer versus removable retainer - Dental caries (alphabetically, according to study design).