Authoryear Country Study design Number
of patients (n)
With
drawals
-
dropouts
Results Comments
Intervention Control
Fixed retainer No retainer
Levin, [16] Israel CT n=92 Group 1: n=48
dental arches Group 2: n=72
dental arches
n=0 Group 1
GR lingual
0.09 mm (sd 0.18) GR labial:
0.14 mm (sd 0.24) PD
1.88 mm (sd 0.24)
Group 2
GR lingual
0.01 mm (sd 0.08)
p=0.005 GR labial:
0.13 mm (sd 0.29) ns. PD
1.87 mm (sd 0.23) ns.
Gingival recession (GR).
Probing depth (PD).
Group 1 =              One or two fixed retainers.
Group 2 =              No fixed retainer.
Rody, [15] Canada CT n=31 Group 1. n=10
Group 2. n=11**
Group 3: n=10
? a Group 1
Incisors:
Mean: 1.85 mm (sd 0.81) Premolars:
Mean: 2.15 mm (sd 0.94)
Group 3
Incisors:
Mean: 1.7 mm (sd 0.63) ns. Premolars:
Mean: 2.05 mm (sd 0.59) ns.
Probing depths.
Group 1 = 3-3 fixed lower retainer.
Group 2 = Removable lower retainer.
Group 3 = No retainer.
Artun, [14] Norway CT n=108 Group 1: n= 31
Group 2: n=18
Grpoup 3: n=14
(Group 4: n=20)
Group 5: n= 25
? a Groups 1 and 2 Interproximal
Mean: 1.46 (sd 0.30) Lingual
Mean: 1.07 (sd 0.15)
Group 5 Interproximal
Mean: 1.42 (sd 0.32) ns. Lingual
Mean: 1.11 (sd 0.16) ns.
Crevice depth
Group 1 = Mandibular cuspid retainer .032 spiral wire.
Group 2 = Mandibular cuspid retainer .032 plain wire
Group 3 = Maxillary .0195 flexible spiral wire retainer.
(Group 4 = Maxillary retainer plate).
Group 5 = No retainer.
Cuspid retainer = bonded only to cuspids.
3-3- retainer = bonded to each tooth.
a Withdrawals and drop-outs not explicitly stated. CT = non-randomised, controlled study. ns = not significant
Table 10: Fixed orthodontic retainer versus no retainer - Periodontal outcomes (alphabetically, according to study design).