Author, year Country Study design Number
of patients (n)
With
drawals
-
dropouts
Results Comments
Intervention
Fixed retainer
Control
Removable retainer
 
Edman Tynelius, [13] Sweden RCT n=75 Group 1: n=25   Group 2: n=25   Group 3: n=25 n=6 Failure
During 24-months:
Group 1
7/25 (28%) In 3 patients one failure.
In 3 patients two failures.
In 1 patient four failures.  
Lost appliance
During (24-months):
Group 1 and 2
5/50 (10%) Group 3
0/25 (0%) p<0.01 (group 1 vs. 3) ns. (group 1 & 2 vs. 3)  
Failure rate (retainer loosening)
Lost appliance Group 1= upper removable retainer                   (vacuum formed) and lower fixed retainer.
Group 2= upper removable retainer                   (vacuum formed) and lower stripping.
Group 3= removable retainer upper and lower (positioner). p-values calculated from study data (Fisher’s exact test).
Artun, [11] USA RCT n=49 Group 1 n=11 Group 2: n=13 Group 3: n=11 Group 4: n=14 ? a All fixed 8/35 (22.9%) Group 1: 1/11 (9.1%) Group 2: 4/13 (30.8%) Group 3: 3/11 (27.3%)   Group 4: 2/14 (14.3%) ns. Failure rate Group 1= Mandibular cuspid retainer .032 plain wire.
Group 2= Mandibular cuspid retainer .032 spiral wire.
Group 3= Mandibular 3-3 retainer .0205 flexible spiral wire.
Group 4= Removable lower retainer. Cuspid retainer- bonded only to cuspids.
3-3 retainer- bonded to each tooth
Cerny, [12] UK CT n=61 Group 1: n=46 Group 2: n=43   ? a Clinical examination
6/46 (13%) patients with:
3 bond failures,
5 broken wires Anamnesis (recall)
PBR fracture rate:
3.15%/year. Bond/wire fracture rate: 0.58%/year
- Failure rate (loosening or broken retainer).
Group 1 =   Permanent bonded retainer                      (PBR ) (upper or lower).
Group 2 =   Removable retainer (RR).
Andrén, [18] Sweden Case-series n=103       n=11 Loosening
Maxilla:
25/67 (37%) retainers
Mandible:
18/52 (35%) retainers Wire fracture
Maxilla: 11 occasions
Mandible: 1 occasion
- Failure rate (loosening or wire fracture). Bonded lingual retainers maxilla and/or mandible (during 5 years of observation) 16 both arches, 41 maxillary retainers, 36 mandibular retainers.
Dahl, [17] Sweden Case-series n=153 Group 1: n=81       Group 2: n=72 n=11
(Group 1)
Loosening (n=retainers)
Group 1
Maxilla: 14/56 (25.0%)
Mandible: 3/29 (10.3%) Group 2
Maxilla: 5/64 (7.8%)
Mandible: 1/17 (5.9%) Wire fracture (n=retainers)
Group 1
Maxilla: 13/56 (23.2%)
Mandible: 3/29 (10.3%) Group 2
Maxilla: 2/64 (3.1%)
Mandible: 0/17 (0.0%) Opening of small spaces
Group 1 and 2:
In 7 patients with retainer loosening
In 4 patients with intact retainers
- Failure rate (loosening or wire fracture).
Other side effects. Group 1 =   Lingual bonded retainers                      (.0195’’ or .0215’’ three-stranded spiral wire).
(45 maxillary retainers, 14 mandibular retainers, 15 both arches).
Group 2 =   Lingual bonded retainers (.0215 five-stranded spiral                      wire).
(55 maxillary retainers, 8 mandibular retainers, 9 both arches). Mean period between orthodontic treatment and examination was 4.57±2.2 years Small spaces = 0.5-1mm openings between teeth within the retained segments
Renkema, [21] Netherlands Case-series n=221 n=0 At least one bonding failure 70/221 (31.7%) Less failures in incisors
than canines
p˂0.001 Central vs. lateral incisors
ns.
- Failure rate Bonded lingual mandibular retainer (.0195’’ 3-strand, heat-treated twist wire). Observation period 5 years
Störmann, [19] Germany Case-series n=103 Group 1: n=31 Group 2: n=38 Group 3: n=34 n=5 Failure (% retainers)
Group 1: 29%
Group 2: 53%
Group 3: 18%   Increased patient discomfort with cuspid retainer
- Failure rate Group 1 =   Bonded retainer .0195’’. Group 2 =   Bonded retainer .0215’’. Group 3 =   Cuspid retainer. Cuspid retainer= bonded only to cuspids.
Tacken, [20] Belgium Case-series n=275 Group 1: n=45 Group 2 n=48 Group 3 n=91 Group 4: n= 90 n=15 Success rate (n=retainers)
Group 1 and 2:
(92/186) 49% Group 3
161/182 (88%)
p<0.001 Failure
Group 1 and 2:
Maxilla:
Broken retainer 37/48 (77%) of all failures Mandible:
Loosening 34/46 (74%)
of all failures Group 3
Maxilla:
Loosening 10/13 (77%)
of all failures. Mandible:
Loosening 8/8 (100%)
of all failures.
- Success rate
Failure (loosening or broken retainer) Group 1 =   Glass fiber reinforced                      bonded retainer 500 fibres.
Group 2 =   Glass fiber reinforced bonded retainer 1000 fibers.
Group 3 =   Multi-stranded bonded retainer.
Group 4 =   No retainer no treatment.  
a Withdrawals and drop-outs not explicitly stated. CT = non-randomised, controlled study. ns = not significant
Table 15: Fixed orthodontic retainer versus removable retainer, or no retainer - Complications (alphabetically, according to study design).