Hematological indicators
Mean ± SE values

% HbA2Mean ± SE

Osmotic Fragility

% Hb F

Abnormal haemoglobin Quantity in %
Mean ± SE

RBC HGB HCT MCV MCH MCHC Reduced (%) Normal (%)
HbD* N = 28 4.49 ± 0.21 12.06 ± 0.63 34.28 ± 1.79 73.34 ± 3.54 25.87 ± 1.30 33.96 ± 1.60 2.66 ± 1.14 8 (33.30) 16 (66.70) 0.61 28.07 ± 1.67
HbQ** N =6 4.49 ± 0.21 11.30 ± 1.30 34.22 ± 2.33 76.58 ± 6.33 25.24 ± 2.64 32.80 ± 1.13 3.50 ± 0.49 2 (33.33) 4 (66.67) ND 9.86 ± 0.60
β thal N = 217 5.76 ± 0.08 11.20 ± 0.15 34.76 ± 0.53 60.81 ± 0.71 19.80 ± 0.34 33.12 ± 1.08 5.99 ± 0.09 213 (98.20) 4 (1.80) 1.23 --

Individual cases of double heterozygotes for abnormal hemoglobin and β thalassaemia HbD-β thal$

 
Case G1 5.05 11.90 35.20 69.70 23.60 33.80 4.50 Reduced 0.40 81.30
Case L2 4.04 12.40 30.50 73.00 27.70 38.00 7.80 Reduced ND 88.00
Case S3 5.75 8.90 27.50 48.00 15.50 32.40 5.90 Reduced 2.00 92.00

HbQ- β thal$

Case L4 4.12 9.40 32.40 77.10 22.40 29.00 5.50 Reduced 0.80 9.90
Figures in the parentheses ( ) represent, percentage, ND: Not Detected, P: Present
* Haematology could not be performed on one sample with HbAD, osmotic fragility could be performed on only 24 HbD subjects
** Hematology could be performed on only 5 samples out of total 6 HbQIndia heterozygote cases.
# Indicates the presence of the abnormal hemoglobin
$ Samples are drawn from pooled population and are not unrelated subjects.
HbF quantified by 1 minute denaturation method
Students’‘t’ test between the quantity of HbD and HbQIndia = 10.26. P < 0.05
Table 2: Distribution of indicative parameters of abnormal haemoglobins and β-Thalassaemia among the Sindhi subgroups$ of Nagpur city.