Response Dimensions to Deliberate Food Contamination
Variable Description FATALISTIC/PANIC FRIGHTHENED CONTROLLED ACCEPTING
Constant -0.4090 -0.1186 0.1417 0.0330
  (-6.76) (-1.94) (2.36) (0.54)
Female (Vs. Male) 0.2021* 0.3854* -0.1638* -
  (2.80) (5.30) (-2.29) -
Young 18-34 (Vs. Mature age >55 years) - - - -0.1035*
  - - - (-2.33)
Midage 35-54 years (Vs. Mature age >55 years) - - - 0.1028*
  - - - (2.32)
College Degree and above (vs. Two-year college education and below) - - -0.0026* -
  - - (-2.34) -
Low income-<$35,000 (vs. High income->$75,000) 0.4405* - -0.1547** 0.189*
  (5.45) - (-1.93) (2.18)
Medium income-$35-$75,000 (vs. High income->$75,000) - -   -
  - -   -
Child (vs no child) - - 0.0007** -
  - - (1.56) -
White - - - 0.0005**
  - - - (1.66)
Liberal (vs. centrist) -0.1302* - - -
  (-2.46) - - -
Conservative (vs. centrist) 0.1298* - - -
  (2.45) - - -
Religious (vs. not religious) 0.0006** -    
  (1.62) - - -
Knowledge of the food supply Chain (vs.s not ) - - - 0.0016*
  -   - (2.56)
Knowledge about Food Safety - - - -
  - - - -
Frequency of Deliberate food tampering - -   -
  - -   -
Frequency of Accidental  food tampering - -   -0.0006**
  - -   (-1.72)
SAFE_GROCERY - 0.0007**    
  - (1.46)    
Confidence in Grocery - -   -0.0016*
  - -   (-2.97)
Confidence in Federal Government -0.0016* - -  
  (-2.09) - -  
MIDWEST -0.1282* - - -
  (-2.17) - - -
SOUTH 0.1010** - - -
  (1.87) - - -
         
NOR_EAST       -0.0987**
        (-1.53)
Adjusted R2 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.06
Model F-statistics 3.2 1.96 1.33 2.04
Note: Figures in Parentheses denote the t-ratios. Single asterisk denotes variable is significant at .05 level and double asterisk denotes variable is significant at .10. The variable categories in parenthesis are excluded to avoid dummy variable trap.
Table 3: Regression Results on Dimensions of Americans Responses/Reactions to Deliberate Food Contamination.