| |
exciting |
good |
neutral |
poor |
awful |
total |
| Interest in the toolkitn (%) |
19 (20.2) |
56 (59.6) |
15(16.0) |
3 (3.2) |
1 (1.1) |
94 (100) |
| Quality ofthe toolkitn (%) |
31 (32.6) |
44 (46.3) |
18 (18.9) |
2 (2.1) |
0 (0) |
95 (100) |
| Usefulness of informationn (%) |
31 (32.9) |
46 (48.9) |
16 (17.0) |
1 (1.1) |
0 (0) |
94 (100) |
| Managebility of information n (%) |
19 (20.0) |
49 (51.6) |
24 (25.3) |
2 (2.1) |
1 (1.1) |
95 (100) |
| Practicability of information n (%) |
26 (27.4) |
40 (42.1) |
26 (27.4) |
3 (3.2) |
0 (0) |
95 (100) |
| 1)Italy, Bulgaria, Turkey, Austria, Denmark, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Romania, Poland, Lithuania |
|
