Factors   foot ulcer   COR(95% CI) AOR(95% CI)
    present Absent    
Foot skin texture Dry & craked 18 49 3.5( 1.63, 7.65) *  
  Smooth & moist 14 135 1  
Callus of the feet Present 31 69 18.6(2.48, 139) * 9.542(0.889,102.444)
  Absent 1 115 1 1
Usse of ill fiiting shoe Yes 31 132 12.2(1.62, 9.17) *  
No 1 52 1    
Sensory loss to vibration Present 20 55 3.91(1.78,8.54) *  
Absent 12 129 1    
Residence Urban 15 140 1 1
  Rural 17 44 3.6(1.66, 7.81) * 4.074(1.262, 13.151) **
Age in years <45 4 57 1  
  ≥45 28 127 3.142(1.053-9.375) *  
Occupation Employees 3 65 1 1
  Farmers 14 34 7.92(2.397, 33.202) * 6.542(2.841, 49.035) **
  Merchant 10 37 5.86(1.515, 22.631) * 5.349(0.766, 37.346)
  Housewife 5 27 4.02(0.895, 17.98) 3.353(0.368, 30.579)
Co-morbiditiy yes 28 87 7.8(2.63, 23.14) * 1
  No 4 97 1 0.611(0.131, 0.955) **
Mean arterial blood pressure ≥ 90 20 72 2.59(1.195, 5.652) * 5.113(1.285, 20.347) **
  <90 12 112 1 1
Duration of diabetes ≥10 years 20 30 8.56(3.785, 19.34) * 8.452(2.305, 30.994) **
  <10 years 12 154 1 1
Attitude Faverable 8 88 1  
  Unfaverable 24 96 2.75(1.174, 6.439) *  
Diabetic foot self care practice Good practice 12 107 1  
  Poor practice 20 77 2.32(1.059, 5.019) *  
BMI in kg/m2 16.5-24.5 4 72 1  
  24.5-29.5 24 108 4.0(1.332, 12.01) *  
  ≥ 29.5 4 4 18.0(3.246, 99.82) *  
Type of co- morbidity Hypertension 7 51 1  
  kidney disease 7 12 4.25(1.25, 14.42) *  
  Neuropathy 9 14 4.68(1.48, 14.8) *  
  HPN & kidney disease 6 7 6.24(1.62, 24.01) *  
Note: * variable with p value of < 0.05 in univariate analysis ** statistically significant associations in ultivariate analysis. ‘1’ reference group, AOR stands for adjusted odds ratio, COR stands for crud (unadjusted) odds ratio.
Table 2: Factors associated with diabetic foot ulcer among diabetic patients attending Arbaminch hospital diabetic clinic, Arbaminch south Ethiopia, 2013.