Drink samples Dose (mg/Kg body weight) Gap defetion Fragment C.fusion aberations normal cells Hypop Hyper
Control 0.8 1 ± 0.5 2 ± 0.5 10.5 ± 1 ± 0.5 50.7 ± 245 ± 0.7 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
2.4 2 ± 0.5 1 ± 0.4 1 ± 0.4 2 ± 0.5 6 ± 1 244 ± 1 10.4 ± 0 ± 0
Pear 0.8 391.3 ± 79 ± 1.8 44 ± 1.3 54 ± 1.9 216 ± 3.5 34 ± 3.5 10.4 ± 2 ± 0.5
2.4 34 ± 0.8 42 ± 1.1 47 ± 1.7 80 ± 3.2 203 ± 3.1 47 ± 3.1 10.4 ± 10.4 ±
Cherry 0.8 220.5 ± 45 ± 1 31 ± 1.3 35 ± 1 133 ± 1.8 117 ± 1.8 0 ± 0 10.4 ±
2.4 88 ± 2.9 40 ± 1 53 ± 1.1 64 ± 0.8 245 ± 2.2 5 ± 2.2 60.8 ± 80.5 ±
Strawberry 0.8 180.9 ± 34 ± 0.8 25 ± 0.8 73 ± 0.4 1501.9 ± 100 ± 1.9 60.4 ± 40.4 ±
2.4 23 ± 0.9 57 ± 2.1 62 ± 1.1 74 ± 1.6 216 ± 4 34 ± 4 2 ± 0.5 10.4 ±
Red grape 0.8 140.8 ± 290.8 ± 21 ± 0.8 16 ± 0.4 80 ± 1.9 170 ± 1.9 10.4 ± 00 ±
2.4 16 ± 0.8 26 ± 0.4 30 ± 1 21 ± 0.8 93 ± 1.3 157 ± 1.3 00 ± 1 ± 0.4
Table 3: Effect of some commercial fruit drinks on chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of mice treated with commercial fruit drinks.