| Author |
Search Module /Journal |
Instrument |
Conclusions |
|
1.Shishenkov M, et al. [8] |
Current general and microscopic urine analysis in the routine (clinical laboratory)practice in Bulgaria-tarakia Journal of sciences vol.11.no 4.2013 |
H 800/FUS100, H300/FUS 100 |
Is less labor intensive, increases productivity, increases technical expertise, he should be in position to verify controls, confirm the automatic findings, LAB can be run on Lean a Principles of Management
Contributes to greater reliability of staff,well recommended |
|
2.J Toffaletti et al. [7] |
Comparison of 2 automated systems for urine chemistry and urine sediment analysis Laboratory and hematology 5:1-xx 1999 |
IRIS 900 UdxSysmex uf-100 |
The arbitration of these instruments with manual microscopy favored each instrument nearly the same, there for the authors agree that both the concerned instruments are nearly the same and are substantially reliable and therefore could be used clinically. |
|
3.Michel R Langlois, et al. [5] |
Clinical Chemistry Jan 1999 vol.45 no .1 118-122 automated flow cytometry compared to an automated dip stick reader for urine analysis |
Sysmex UF-100 |
In conclusion dip stick testing combined with computer assisted UF-100 sieving system may lead to an clinically acceptable urine analysis,
UF-100 analyzer is not a substitute for microscopic sediment examination |
|
4.Yuksel H et al. [12] |
Journal of clinical lab analysis. Jul 2013 27(4):312-6. Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS 100 AND Lab Umat-Uri Sed with manual microscopy. |
Lab UMat-Uri Sed, H800-FUS 100 with manual microscopy, |
The two devices showed similar performances, they were time saving in the form of standardized technique, especially for reducing pre analytical errors such as study time, centrifugation and specimen volume for sedimentary analysis, however the automated systems are still inadequate for classifying cells that are present in pathological urinary specimens |
|
5.Delanghe JR et al. [13] |
The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice clinical chemistry acta 2000 Nov:301(1-2):1-18 |
UF-100 sysemax Japan |
The popular approach would be to combine test strips with UFC A for primary screening, it states that expert system now exisists combining both test modalities based on user definable decision rules |
|
6.Chien TI et al. [14] |
Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urine analysis system and manual microscopy journal of clinical chemistry acta 2007 Sep: 384 (1-2):28-34.Epub 2007 may 26. |
Sysmex UF-100 IRIS IQ 200 Manual Microscopy |
The 2 automated instruments demonstrated Good Concordance with Each Other in Urine Sediment Examination .The automated process could be used as a screening procedure but some manual microscopy will be necessary |
|
7.Ito K et al. [15] |
Automated analysis on urine formed element by using FCM article in Japanese RinshoByori 2001 Sept :49(9):847-52 |
FCM JapanesTecnology |
At the moment detailed examination of epithelial cells and casts are difficult on these fundamental tests till an improved analytical algorithm and staining technology is in place |
|
8.Wah DT et al. [3] |
Analytical performance of the iQ 200 Automated Urine M microscopy Analyzer and Comparison With Manual count s using Fuchs –Rosenthal’s Cells Chambers 2005 American Journal of clinical pathology 123,290-296 |
Iris iQ200 iris diagnostics, (Chatsworth, CA) Manual method using Fuchs –Rosenthal’s chambers |
Their final recommendation of the manufacture manual review of stored images is that all casts, Wbc clumps, yeasts should be verified by |
|
9.Van den Broek D et al. [16] |
Benefits of the iQ200 Automated urine microscopy analyzer in routine urine analysis clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2008:46(11):1635-40 |
IQ200 with routine manual urine analysis |
The identification of dysmorphic erythrocytes and casts is consistent, the sub classification of casts require well trained technicians .The automated instruments -classification of particles was least reliable for yeasts and bacterial cocci |
|
10.Fogazzi GB et al. [17-20] |
Automation verses manual The urinary sediment. An integrated view |
3 automated systems with manual sediment analysis |
Automated systems had their deficiency with respect to reference, a, the difference in manual methodology was from person to person but classification and equal technical experience will play a role in uniformity of reporting |
|
11.Secchiero S, Fogazzi GB, et al. [21] |
(EQUAS)For the urinary sediment an Italian experience crb 2007 |
In 6 years 72 images, 144 photographs and each of the same elements to the same laboratory twice were compared |
Limitation one picture with a single element which is not a standard protocol followed for routine examination the current technique was useful in continual improvement of urinary sediment exam Quality |
|
12.Giovanni B Fogazzi, Simon Verdesca and Giuseppe Garigali[22] |
Urine analysis : Core Curriculum 2008 |
Automated analysis of urine sediment of both techniques involving image analysis using digital software and flow cytometry technology using scatter grams and numeric data, both these instrument have been flagging acceptable results for Rbcs, squamous epithelial cells, some variants of crystals and casts, bacteria and yeast cells, sperms, however they do not recognize particles of nephrological importance such as eg far too many false negative casts |
These fully automated machines can be used in laboratories to screen large numbers of mostly normal samples for a short period of time .in the others opinion this approach is not adequate for renal patients for whom manual microscopy combined with motivated well educated examiner represents the gold standards |
|
13.Tsai JJ et al. [23] |
Comparison and interpretation of urine analysis performed by a nephrologist versus a hospital –based clinical laboratory American journal of kidney diseases 2005 Nov ;46(46):820-9 |
Microscopy difference by laboratory technicians and urine microscopy reading nephrologists |
Nephrologists made better diagnosis of renal tubular epithelial cells, renal tubular epithelial casts and dysmorphic red blood cells, Epithelial cells, whereas the laboratory may report renal tubular epithelial as squamous epithelial cells in a significant no of cases |
|
14.Rolando claure-del grando, ElienneMacedo, Ravindra[24] |
Urine microscopy in acute kidney injury :time to change American journal of kidney disease 2011 |
Microscopy the nephrologists should take precedence of reporting urines when compared to general laboratory findings |
Their conclusions have been suggestions of initiatives in every nephrology programmed, with implements such as multithreaded scopes, should be priority based nieces in a nephrology training programme |
15.SimonaVerdesca, Claudia Brambilla,Giuseppe Gargali,
Maria DaneilaCroci,
PiergiorgioMessa and Giovanni Battista Fogazzi[25] |
How a skilful and motivated urinary sediment examination can save the kidneys Journal of nephrology dialysis and transplantation 2007, 22, 1778, 1781 |
Dip stick and manual exam in |
A urine sediment under the reporting of an unskilled eye will miss pathological casts which go un noticed many a time |
