EF Strains C.C N.Di N.R N.C S.P C.P.L A.N.N N.N N.De N.H EF 62 20 6 1 0.118 1796(10%) 2.606 1.712 132 0.013 1.311 EF CH188 15 12 1 0.089 4768(20%) 4.892 1.803 152 0.012 1.362 EF D6 12 8 1 0.145 2108(20%) 3.367 1.762 101 0.018 1.280 EF DAPTO 516 18 6 1 0.113 1912(10%) 2.618 1.739 138 0.013 1.325 EF HIP11704 16 4 1 0.166 1226(12%) 2.263 1.683 101 0.017 1.371 EF JH1 16 4 1 0.160 1184(12%) 2.309 1.677 99 0.017 1.326 EF TX0102 14 8 1 0.096 4260(19%) 3.776 1.813 150 0.012 1.414 EFTX0635 21 4 1 0.140 1254(8%) 2.166 1.65 120 0.014 1.345 EF V583 12 6 1 0.132 1618(17%) 2.925 1.75 96 0.018 1.226 EF X86 17 10 1 0.092 4404(17%) 4.288 1.797 158 0.011 1.267

Table 1: Comparison of network parameters in 10 different Enterococcus faecalis strains [F-Enterococcus faecalis, C.C: Connected Components; N.Di: Network Diameter; N.R: Network Radius; N.C: Network Centralization; S.P: Shortest Paths; C.P.L: Characteristic Path Length; A.N.N: Average Numbers of Neighbors; N.N: Number of Nodes; N.De: Network Density and N.H: Network Heterogeneity].