Table 4

T1D vs. NGT
SwissProt	Symbol	T-test	Wilcoxon	SAM	LIMMA	ROTS	Koo et al. [29]
Q8N8N7	ZADH1	0,13	0,15	1,00	0,14	*0,00*	0
Q4G0Q6	MGC72080	0,34	0,15	1,00	0,14	*0,00*	0
Q8NCL8	TMEM116	0,13	0,26	1,00	0,19	*0,00*	0
Q19CC5	TRABD	0,21	0,31	1,00	0,21	*0,00*	0
NA	NA	0,18	0,15	1,00	0,20	*0,00*	0
Q86UD5	LOC133308	0,99	0,52	1,00	0,17	*0,00*	0
T1D vs. NGT+T2D
SwissProt	Symbol	T-test	Wilcoxon	SAM	LIMMA	ROTS	Koo et al. [29]
P35443	THBS4	0,15	0,36	1,00	0,24	*0,00*	0
Q8N8N7	ZADH1	0,24	0,36	1,00	0,26	*0,00*	0
Q4G0Q6	MGC72080	0,42	0,25	1,00	0,24	*0,00*	0
T1D vs. T2D
SwissProt	Symbol	T-test	Wilcoxon	SAM	LIMMA	ROTS	Koo et al. [29]
P49959	MRE11A	0,66	0,26	1,00	0,35	*0,00*	0

Table 4: ROTS detections that were not found by the other methods (FDR<0.05). The first two columns are the detected proteins and the next five columns show their corresponding FDR values from the different tests. The last column indicates whether our detections were found in the original study of Koo et al. [29]: “1” means “detected” and “0” means “not detected”.