# Author, year, location (Type) Participants Measurement Outcomes Results
1 Lonbro et al., 2013 [13] Denmark  (Non randomized controlled study) N=90 (66 HNSCC; 24 healthy) Mean age: 56±8y HNSCC; 59±9y Healthy Gender ratio: 12F:54M HNSCC; 7F:17M Healthy Race: NR Cancer type: HNSCC Cancer stage: NR Treatment: Radiation or chemo-radiation Lean body mass (DXA) Muscle strength (isokinetic dynamometry) Functional performance (10m walk, sit to stand 30s, stair climb, 30s max arm curl) Level of leisure time physical activity (Saltin & Grimby Questionnaire)
  • Baseline LBM 10% lower in HNSCC compared to healthy (5.6±1.5kg); p<0.0001; 95%CI -8.6; -2.7); at 12 weeks significant difference is absent
  • Baseline muscle strength 15% lower in HNSCC and significant difference in isometric muscle strength (p<0.0001); at 12 weeks significant difference is absent
  • Baseline functional performance was 18% lower in HNSCC; at 12 weeks significant difference is absent
  • 83% of HNSCC participated in at least light PA for a minimum of 4 hours per week
  • 95% of healthy individuals participated in at least light PA for a minimum of 4 hours per week
  Other:
  • Significant association between LBM and all measures of maximal strength R2= 0.59-0.67 (p<0.0001); KE strength 4.8-5.5Nm/kg LBM, KF strength 2.0-2.2 Nm/kg LBM
  • Significant association between total body weight and muscle strength R2= 0.50 – 0.57 (p<0.0001)
  • Association between maximal isometric KE strength and 30s arm curl R2=0.44 (p<0.0001), 10m max gait speed R2=0.31 (p<0.0001), 30s chair rise R2=0.34 (p<0.0001), not significant with stair climb R2= 0.21 (p=0.007)
  • No association between functional performance tests and physical function of EORTC QLQ-C30
2 Lonbro et al., 2013 [14] Denmark (RCT) N=30 (16 PROCR; 14 PLA) Median age: 56y PROCR; 59y PLA Gender ratio: 7F:23M Race: NR Cancer type: HNSCC (pharynx, larynx, pharynx and larynx, nasopharynx, oral cavity, unknown primary) Cancer stage: I-II: 1, III-IV: 29 Treatment: Radiation or chemo-radiation Feasibility (Recruitment rate, retention, adherence and adverse events) Body Composition/Lean body mass (DXA) Muscle strength (isokinetic dynamometry) Functional performance (10m walk, sit to stand 30s, stair climb, 30s max arm curl)
  • Recruitment rate 28% (30 of 109); Retention rate 70% (21 of 30); Adherence to PRT 97% (29 out of 30 sessions over mean of 13 weeks); No adverse events
  • LBM increased significantly by 5.0±3.8% (50.5±9.3 to 53.1± 10.8kg) in PROCR group (p<0.0001) and 2.8±2.5% (50.4±8.4 to 51.7±8.3kg) in PLA group (p=0.07); LBM increase in HPV positive patients was 1.8 kg larger than HPV negative (p=0.06; 95% CI -0.04; 3.7)
  • Both groups increased muscle strength significantly pre to post exercise program but no difference between groups
  • Both groups increased functional performance significantly pre to post exercise program but no difference between groups
  Other:
  • No difference between group in BW, LBM or BM
  • BW increase non-significant in PROCR and unchanged in PLA
  • FM decreased non-significant in PROCR and PLA
3 Lonbro et al., 2013 [12] Denmark (RCT) N=41 (20 EE 21 DE) Mean age: 55±7y EE; 58±7y DE Gender ratio: 7F:23M Race: NR Cancer type: HNSCC (pharynx, larynx, , oral cavity, unknown primary) Cancer stage: I-II: 8, III-IV: 33 Treatment: Radiation or chemo-radiation Lean body mass (DXA) Muscle strength (isokinetic dynamometry) Functional performance (10m walk, sit to stand 30s, stair climb, 30s max arm curl) Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
  • EE increased LBM by 4.3% (2.3kg; p<0.001; 95% CI 0.5; 2.5) DE increased LBM by 4.2% (2.4kg; p<0.001; 95% CI 1.1) after PRT
  • EE Isometric KE increased by 20% (33Nm; p<0.001; 95%CI16; 50) DE increased 21% (34Nm; p<0.001; 95% CI 17; 50) after PRT. Similar results observed for isokinetic KF; larger increase in isometric KF and isokinetic KE in DE
  • DE improved functional tests: arm curl and chair raise
  • EE improved overall QOL and “cognitive function” after PRT than DE self chosen activity; DE improved “physical function” more after PRT than EE self chosen activity
  Other:
  • Recruitment 22%; retention rate 83%; adherence to PRT 95% for both groups; no adverse events reported.
  • Stratification factors (HPV/p16 positive, presence of feeding tube, treatment induced weight loss) not significantly related to LBM increase
4 Samuel et al., 2013 [19] India (RCT) N=48 (24 Ex, 24 UC) Mean age: 52.5±8.27y ex; 51.7±10y UC Gender ratio: 6F:42M Race: NR Cancer type: HNC Cancer stage: NR Treatment: concurrent chemo-radiation Functional capacity (6MWT) Quality of life (SF36)
  • 6MWD increased 42m in exercise group and decreased 96m in UC (p<0.05); statistically significant different 6MWD from baseline with and between groups with moderate effect size (d=0.46) for between group
  • Physical component score decreased to 32.7(18%) in UC while exercise group stayed the same
  • Mental component score increased to 40.9 (11.73%) in exercise group, while decreased to 23 (75.21%) in UC
  Other:
  • Adherence was not monitored
  • No adverse events
5 Eades et al., 2013 [20] Canada (Retrospective Cohort) N=31 enrolled, data on 27 reported Mean age: 54.9±9.2 Gender ratio: 5F:22M Race: NR Cancer type: HNC (nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx) Cancer stage: I-II: 6, III-IV: 21 Treatment: surgery, radiation, chemotherapy or combo Functional status (6MWT) Quality of life (ESAS) Nutritional (BW and presence of PEG) Symptoms severity (ESAS) Interference with function (MD Anderson symptom inventory) Distress level (thermometer)
  • Improved 6MWD 59m (95% CI 27-91) after program (effect size, d=0.8)
  • Improved QOL change mean 1.8 (effect size, d=0.8)
  • 11 gained >1kg, 10 maintained, 6 lost >1kg BW
  • Baseline most severe symptoms: weakness, anorexia, pain, and depression. End of program strong decrease in pain and weakness (effect size: d=0.8-0.9), moderate decrease in shortness of breath, anorexia, insomnia and depression (effect size: 0.6-0.7) and non significant decrease in nausea, vomiting, constipation and sleepiness (effect size d=0.1-0.4)
  • No clinically meaningful reduction in symptom interference (d=0.2-0.4)
  • Patients reported moderate decrease in distress (d=0.7). Percentage exceeding clinical important distress fell from 73% to 42% (p=0.008).
 
6 Rogers et al., 2013 [18] USA (RCT) N=15 (7 Ex; 8 UC) Mean age: 60.5±12.5y Gender ratio: 3F:12M Race: 15 white Cancer type: HNC (nasopharyngeal, salivary gland, scalp, oral cavity, tongue, oropharyngeal, larynx, unknown primary) Cancer stage: I-II: 7, III-IV: 8 Treatment: radiation or chemo-radiation Feasibility (recruitment, completion, adverse events, adherence) paid $25 for completed assessment Lean body mass (BIA) Muscle strength (leg and hand dynamometer)
Physical functioning (tandem balance, 8 foot walk time, 5 rise and sit) QOL (FACT-H&N, FACT G) Fatigue (FACT-fatigue subscale)
  • Recruitment rate 45% (15 of 33); Retention rate 100% at 6 weeks and 87% at 12 weeks; Adherence 83% (70 of 84) first 6 weeks, 53% (32 of 60) at home; 3 unrelated adverse events
  • Small to medium effect size increase in 6 week LBM (d=0.35)
  • Small to medium effect size increase for hand grip at 6 (d=0.22) and 12 weeks (d=0.34) Small decreases in back/leg extensor strength at 6 (-0.21) and 12 weeks (d=-0.19)
  • Small to medium effect size increase in chair rise 6  (d=-0.63) and 12 weeks (d=-0.60); minimal increases in physical functioning (d=0.15-0.19)
  • Medium and small effect size increase for overall QOL 6 (d=0.52) and 12 weeks (d=0.39), physical well being 6  (d=0.44) and 12 weeks (d=0.36), emotional well being 12 weeks (d=0.45), functional well being 6 (d=0.41) and 12 weeks (d=0.33)
  • Small to medium effect size, significant increase in fatigue control in 6 week (d=-0.64)
  • Small decrease in HNC specific symptoms at 6 weeks (d=-0.23) and 12 weeks (d=-0.25). Little increase in social well being
7 Aghili et al., 2007 [21] Iran (Prospective non-randomized parallel group design) N=30 Mean age: NR Gender ratio: NR Race: NR Cancer type: Breast and HNC Cancer stage: NR Treatment: radiation Fatigue (BFI)
  • Baseline moderate fatigue 56% (exercise) and 43% (UC) (no significant difference, p=0.632) 
  • 4th week exercise 44% mild fatigue UC 57% severe fatigue (significant difference reported, p=0.011)
  • 2-4th week median severity unchanged in exercise group, increased in UC (p=0.039)
  • Median fatigue for 24h period first week - exercise 56% and UC 43% had equal moderate fatigue (p=0.647)
  • Median fatigue 24h period at 4 week exercise 38% mild and UC 57% severe (p=0.001)
  • 2-4th week median 24h period severity unchanged in exercise group increase in UC (p=0.013)
 
8 Crevenna et al., 2003 [22] Austria (Prospective Cohort) N=6 laryngectomy patients Mean age: 57±10 Gender ratio: All male Feasibility (acceptance, compliance, safety in a group, impact on goals of therapy) Endurance capacity (cycle ergometer and 6MWT)
Quality of Life (SF36)
Postural control (SMART Equitest system)
  • Adherence rate 88% (127 of 144)
  • Improved endurance capacity (p<0.028); longer 6MWD (p<0.028)
  • Improved QOL sub scales: “physical functioning” (p<0.027), “vitality” (p<0.027) “role-physical” (p<0.027) and social functioning (p<0.043) other subscales improved not significantly
  • Improved postural stability
  • Decreased perception of fatigue (p<0.028)
  • Expectoration improved (p<0.043)
  • Improved perceived neck and shoulder mobility (p<0.027)
  • Improved perception of flexibility (p<0.027)
  • Improved perception of postural control (p<0.028)
Table 5: Experimental trials with head and neck cancer patients and full body exercise interventions.
Abbreviations: N=number of participants; F= female; M=male; HNC= head and neck cancer; HNSCC=head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; RT=radiotherapy; LBM=lean
body mass; PROCR=creatine PLA=placebo; HPV=human papillomavirus; BW=body weight; FM=fat mass; BM=body mass; KE=knee extension; KF=knee flexion;
QOL=quality of life; DXA=dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; EORTC QLQ-C30=European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire;
6MWT=six minute walk test; SF-36= Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36; ESAS=Edmonton symptom assessment system; BIA=bioelectrical impedance analysis;
FACT-HN=functional assessment of cancer therapy-Head and Neck Cancer; FACT-G=functional assessment of cancer therapy-general;6MWD=six minute walk distance;
PEG=percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube; NR=not reported