Question/recommendation: Should comprehensive (in-house) medical management vs. off-site medical referrals be used to reduce injury rate in professional dancers |
Population: Professional dancers (ballet and modern) |
Intervention: Comprehensive In-house Medical Management (including Injury audit/Screening/Intervention programs) vs. offsite medical referrals |
Setting: Professional dance companies |
Decision domain |
Judgement |
Reason for judgement |
Sub domains influencing judgement |
Yes |
No |
Balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes: Given the best estimate of typical values and preferences, are you confident that the benefits outweigh the harms and burdens or vice versa? |
x |
|
The desirable outcomes are a reduction of injury rate. There is no evidence to suggest the use of in house comprehensive medical management would be detrimental to the patient group |
The size and specialities within the comprehensive medical management has not been established. Similarly if differences are needed for various sub-group populations, i.e. ballet or modern? |
Confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence): Is there high or moderate quality evidence |
|
x |
The evidence profile for this outcome is very low for the desired outcome. There is no evidence to any detrimental/harm outcome through utilising this intervention |
Key reasons for rating down of evidence is through the use of observational studies with certain limitations in the GRADE rating factors |
Values and preferences: Are you confident about the typical values and preferences and are they similar across the target population? |
x |
|
We can be confident that professional dancers place a high value on a reduction in injury rate as their livelihood is dependent on their ability to dance |
The increasing number of higher quality studies into injury rate reflects the position of the dance environment |
Resource implications: Are the resources worth the expected net benefit from following the recommendation? |
x |
|
There is a resource need to provide in-house medical provision. This has been demonstrated to reduce the overall medical costs and outweigh the costs of its implementation. |
Although not explicitly examined as part of the review, the use of in-house medical teams are becoming more common place- the implementation of injury audits, screening and program interventions could be seen as sunk costs. Cost per resource unit needs to be established. |
Overall strength of recommendation |
Strong |
The author recommends that the injury rate of dancers in professional companies will be reduced through the use of comprehensive medical management. |
Evidence to recommendation synthesis |
The high value placed on injury reduction through comprehensive medical management versus harm outweighed the lower evidence profile in the absence of stronger evidence |