| Study |
Patients |
Follow-up (mo) |
Outcome |
Revision Rate (%) |
Component Failure Rate (%) |
Complication Rate (%) |
| Total Shoulder Arthroplasty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neer et al. [30] |
16 |
30 |
91% Successful* |
6% |
%30 |
|
| Franklin et al. [29] |
14 |
37 |
%46 pain, %15 instability |
30% |
50% |
50% |
| Nwakama et al. [30] |
7 |
63 |
14% successful* |
29% |
43% |
71% |
| Hemiarthroplasty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Williams et al. [31] |
21 |
48 |
86% successful* |
0% |
0% |
|
| Zuckerman et al. [32] |
15 |
28 |
87% satisfied |
0% |
0% |
7% |
| Sanchez-Sotelo et al. [33] |
37 |
60 |
67% successful* |
0% |
0% |
5% |
| Goldberg et al. [49] |
34 |
44 |
76% successful* |
0% |
0% |
6% |
| Gadea et al. [50] |
43 |
141.9 |
Constant-Murley score 46,2 |
38.5% |
|
18.6% |
| Field et al. [51] |
16 |
13 |
63% |
13% |
0% |
38% |
| Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sirveaux et al. [16] |
80 |
44 |
96% no or little pain |
4% |
15% |
12% |
| Boileau et al. [39] |
21 |
40 |
95% satisfied or very satisfied |
0% |
0% |
24% |
| Frankle et al. [36] |
60 |
33 |
68% good or excellent |
12% |
3% |
17% |
| Young et al. [43] |
33 |
38 |
89% good or excellent |
0% |
0% |
8% |
| Nolan et al. [52] |
67 |
24 |
Constant-Murley score 62 |
0% |
0% |
%23 |
| Ji et al. [53] |
42 |
24 |
American Shoulder and Elbow score 68 |
7% |
7% |
20% |
| Ek et al. [54] |
46 |
93 |
Constant score 74 |
25% |
15% |
37.5% |
