alexa
Reach Us +44-1235425476
A Verification of Treatment Protocol in Fractionated Radiotherapy by Biological Dosimetry | OMICS International
ISSN: 2155-9619
Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Radiation Therapy

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

A Verification of Treatment Protocol in Fractionated Radiotherapy by Biological Dosimetry

Idil ÖNER1*, Tuncay ORTA1, Melek Özlem KOLUSAYIN2, Süreyya GÜNEBAKAN1, Asuman Kaynar Öztas3 and Mustafa Ünsal3

1Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Istanbul, Istanbul University, Turkey

2Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Forensic Medicine Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

3Okmeydani Educational and Researh Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Corresponding Author:
Idil Öner, M.Sc,
Istanbul University, Faculty of Science
Department of Biology, Vezneciler, 34459, Istanbul, Turkey
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: July 19, 2011; Accepted Date: July 30, 2011; Published Date: July 31, 2011

Citation: ÖNER I, ORTA T, KOLUSAYIN MÖ, GÜNEBAKAN S, Öztas AK, et al. (2011) A Verification of Treatment Protocol in Fractionated Radiotherapy by Biological Dosimetry. J Nucl Med Radiat Ther 2:116. doi:10.4172/2155-9619.1000116

Copyright: © 2011 ÖNER I, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Radiation Therapy

Abstract

In radiation therapy of cancer, any possible mistakes that may occur in prescribed tumour dose calculation and/ or in treatment set up could also be checked by the biological dosimetry. In order to verify this, 20 patients having pelvic area tumours with no prescribed chemotherapy were selected. Their peripheral blood samples were collected before starting fractionated radiotherapy and at some definite time during treatment. Equivalent whole body doses (EWBD) were calculated from patient’s weights, irradiated volumes and total tumor doses given until the date of blood sample collection during treatment. Each patient’s EWBD was given in vitro to blood samples that were collected before starting radiotherapy. Radiation induced chromosome damage in lymphocytes were measured by micronucleus (MN) induction.

The relationship between the micronucleus frequencies (MN/BN) scored during therapy ( in vivo ) and the micronucleus frequencies scored after the application of in vitro EWBD was investigated. MN/BN rates scored following in vitro application of EWBD differed between 0.195 and 0.540, whereas MN/BN rates obtained during radiotherapy equivalent to EWBD differed between 0.213 and 0.625. It was shown that there was no significant difference (p=0.653) between the MN scores following in vitro applied EWBD and MN scores obtained in vivo . The existence of this correlation has confirmed the correct application of fractionated radiotherapy and treatment setup for the patients.

Keywords

Biological Dosimetry; Radiotherapy; Micronucleus; Lymphocytes; Pelvic Tumors

Introduction

Use of radiation therapy in cancer treatment is one of the important treatment modalities. It can be used alone in treating many local cancers leading to a long time tumor control with good cosmetic results [1]. It may also be used in combination with surgery and/or chemotherapy. Radiotherapy standards should be raised in order to provide a better tumor control. In addition to requirements in scientific research for raising standards, radiation dose calculation and preparing the treatment setup for patient according to the treatment protocol is important in delivering accurate prescribed fractional radiation dose to tumor site [2]. For this reason, control of the treatment setup during the treatment period should be ensured by the physician, radiation physicist and radiotherapy technician in collaboration with each other.

Understanding any possible mistake at radiation dose calculations and/or treatment setup could also be possible by biological dosimetry which is based on measuring radiation induced chromosome damage [3]. In biological dosimetry, absorbed radiation dose estimations are generally made by scoring dicentric chromosome aberrations [4-7]. Background frequencies of this kind of unstable chromosome aberrations in healthy people with no radiation working history are very low [8]. Therefore dicentric formation is mostly related to radiation induction and there is a relationship between dicentric aberration frequency and radiation dose [5,6,9]. Scoring dicentric chromosomes is diffficult and takes a long time. A necessity arises in some applications of biological dosimetry in order to get results in a shorter time. Measuring micronuclei (MN) in binucleate cells is one of the techniques which meet with this requirement.

Micronucleus may represent acentric chromosome fragment or a whole chromosome that may be lost during segregation [10]. Micronuclei formation in human peripheral lymphocytes has been shown by the investigators to be a good representative of radiation damage [10-13]. In this study, MN technique was applied to peripheral blood lymphocytes of the radiotherapy patients having pelvic site tumors in order to verify the correct delivery of the prescribed tumor dose and treatment set-up during their fractionated treatment.

Materials and Methods

Patient selection

20 patients with pelvic site tumors were chosen for this study. Their ages varied between 35 and 82. They had either earlier stage of disease or no chemotherapy following surgery. Patient’s ages, tumor sites, tumor stages and treatment protocols were given in Table 1. Patients were told that their peripheral blood were taken before they start and during a definite time of radiotherapy in order to verify the prescribed tumor dose and treatment set-up. Patient’s weights were measured before they start to radiotherapy for calculating their integral doses and equivalent wole body doses. They were treated by either 18 MV X-rays (Linear accelerator, Linac, PHILIPS) or gamma rays (Co-60 THR 780 E or Co-60 ATC).

Patient

Age (years) Tumor type
and stage
Radiation source Fraction number Total dose (Gy)
1 47 vagina ca. stage; IIB Co-60 THR 25 50
2 51 Op. corpus ca. stage; IC Co-60 THR 25 50
3 49 Op.  cervix ca. stage; IC Co-60 THR 25 50
4 74 Inop. cervix ca. stage; IIB Co-60 THR 25 50
5 74 Op. endo. ca. stage; IIA Co-60 THR 25 50
6 64 Op. endo. ca. stage; IC Linac-18 MV 25 50
7 43 Cervix ca stage; IIB Co-60 THR  25 50
8 56 Op. endo. ca. stage; IIIA Co-60 THR 25 50
9 58 Op. endo. ca. stage; IIB Co-60 THR 25 50
10 35 Op. endo. ca. stage; IIB Co-60 THR 25 50
11 73 Op. endo. ca. stage; IC Co-60 THR 25 50
12 45 recur. over ca. stage; recur Co-60 THR 25 50
13 71 Inop. cervix ca. stage; IIB Co-60 THR 25 50
14 54 Endo. ca. stage; IIB Co-60 ATC 25 50
15 55 Op. endo. ca. stage; IIIA Co-60 THR 25 50
16 69 Op. cervix ca. stage; IB Co-60 THR 25 50
17 43 endo. ca. stage; IB Co-60 ATC 25 50
18 54 Op. endo. ca. stage; IIA Co-60 ATC 25 50
19 82 Op. endo. ca. stage; IC Co-60 THR 25 50
20 49 Op. endo. ca. stage; IC Linac 18-MV 25 50

Table 1: Patients ages, tumor types and treatment protocols.

Integral dose and equivalent whole body dose calculations

Integral doses were calculated according to the John’s formulation [14]; Σ = 1.44 x Do x A x d½ x (1-exp (-0.6938d / d½) x (1 + 2.88 d½ / f) / 1000 where, Do = given radiation dose, A = irradiated area, d½ = 50% depth dose of isodose curves, f = source skin distance (SSD) and d = patient thickness.

Equivalent whole body doses (EWBD) for each patient were calculated dividing integral doses by patient’s weights before they start to therapy. EWBD defines the total radiation dose that body acquires during treatment [9].

Blood sampling

Peripheral blood samples were taken into 5 ml heparinized tubes before start and during between 8-12 days of their treatment.

In vitro radiation application

Equivalent whole body doses (EWBD) that were calculated for each patient from their body weights, irradiated volumes and tumor doses were given in vitro. EWBD’s were kept to be between 2-3 Gy to compare in vitro and in vivo MN frequencies [15]. In vitro irradiation of any particular patient’s blood was performed by the radiotherapy unit that was used to threat that particular patient. Blood tubes were irradiated at high dose rate inside the bolus material.

Lymphocyte culture

Microculture method [16] was applied for blood culture with minor modifications. 0.5 ml of 5 ml blood that was either irradiated in vitro or taken in vivo was put into culture containing Phytohemagglutinin (PHA, 15 μg/ml), 4 ml of RPMI-1640 culture medium (Sigma, USA) and 1 ml of Newborne Calf Serum. Cultures were incubated at 37°C for 45 hours. Cytochalasin-B (Sigma, USA) at 6 μg/ml was added [17,13] to inhibit cell division and cultures were left another 24 hours in the incubator. At the end of 69 hours of total incubation period, cultures were treated by hypotonic KCI solution (0.075) and then centrifuged for 3 times by methanol: acetic acid solution at 7:1 (v:v) ratio. Fixed cells were dropped onto glass slides and then stained by 5% Giemsa solution.

Cell counting

Cells having two identical nuclei were considered as binucleate cell under the light microscope with 400 magnifications. Nuclei like formations outside the main nuclei and no bigger than half of any daughter nucleus have been scored as micronucleus. Binucleate cells with or without MN were scored and MN frequencies for each patient were calculated.

Statistics

The relationship between in vivo MN frequencies obtained during treatment and MN frequencies obtained after application of EWBD in vitro was evaluated by Spearman correlation test [18]. Correlation between in vivo and in vitro MN frequencies was evaluated by the paired t-test [18].

Results

Patient’s treatment and dosimetry

All the patients received 50 Gy radiation dose in 25 fractions as being 2 Gy/fraction (Table 1). Irradiated volume and area on patient’s skin, body weights, and planned radiation dose given to tumor by the time blood samples were taken during treatment, integral dose and EWBD of patients by that time were given in Table 2. Blood that were taken before patients start to radiotherapy were given in vitro radiation dose equal to calculated whole body dose of fractionated treatment at the time of blood collection. For this, body weights of patients before entering therapy were measured and treatment area of patients was calculated.

Patient Irradiated volume (cm3) Irradiated area (cm2) Body weight (kg) Fraction number Tumor dose (Gy) Integral dose (kg.Gy) EWBD (Gy)
1 7344 306 86 10 20 227.55 2.65
2 6072 264 66 10 20 186.18 2.82
3 4050 225 49 11 22 130.35 2.66
4 4950 247.5 59 10 20 146.89 2.49
5 4374 182.3 60.5 11 22 149.29 2.47
6 6075 225 94 10 20 190.63 2.03
7 4862 221 64.5 9 18 134.73 2.09
8 5760 288 66 11 22 190.52 2.89
9 5460 227.5 58 9 18 156.13 2.69
10 5184 288 66 11 22 167.66 2.54
11 4116 196 57 12 24 160.24 2.81
12 6992 304 67 9 18 194.00 2.90
13 7200 300 71.5 9 18 201.07 2.81
14 6336 264 97 11 22 216.28 2.23
15 7812 279 83.5 10 20 253.82 3.03
16 6090 203 99 11 22 223.86 2.26
17 5003 217.5 57.5 11 22 168.69 2.93
18 4774 217 70 11 22 159.73 2.28
19 6448 248 93 11 22 224.81 2.42
20 4950 225 67 12 24 180.84 2.70

Table 2: Physical measures and dose calculations of patients.

Integral doses were calculated after adding total skin dose embarked until blood collection during treatment. EWBD for each patient was calculated as dividing integral dose by body weight.

Micronucleus frequencies obtained in vitro and during radiotherapy

Number of binucleate cells and number of micronuclei in these cells at different tumor doses before and during radiotherapy were given in Table 3. MN frequencies (MN/BN) were the ratio of micronuclei to binucleate cells.

Patient EWBD (Gy) Scores obtained after EWBD application in vitro before treatment Scores obtained after in vivo EWBD during therapy
BN cell MN MN/BN BN cell MN MN/BN
1 2.65 363 116 0.319 187 69 0.368
2 2.82 403 86 0.213 1487 365 0.245
3 2.66 1113 602 0.540 296 185 0.625
4 2.49 934 330 0.353 723 247 0.342
5 2.47 708 187 0.264 523 135 0.258
6 2.03 215 73 0.339 339 106 0.312
7 2.09 218 70 0.321 950 310 0.326
8 2.89 375 148 0.379 744 252 0.339
9 2.69 394 110 0.279 214 60 0.280
10 2.54 168 39 0.232 546 128 0.234
11 2.81 418 114 0.273 289 77 0.266
12 2.90 485 134 0.276 425 101 0.238
13 2.81 331 67 0.202 220 50 0.227
14 2.23 221 43 0.195 582 118 0.272
15 3.03 353 77 0.201 624 150 0.240
16 2.26 478 125 0.262 610 130 0.213
17 2.93 387 86 0.222 527 126 0.239
18 2.28 576 129 0.224 504 126 0.25
19 2.42 693 150 0.216 632 142 0.225
20 2.70 225 60 0.267 194 48 0.247

Table 3: MN frequencies before and during therapy.

MN/BN ratios after application of in vitro EWBD were between 0.195 and 0.540 and MN/BN ratios after the embarkment of the same EWBD during radiotherapy were between 0.213 and 0.625 (Figure 1). Analyzing these data by the Spearman correlation test showed an existence of the significant relationship (r=0.847) between MN frequencies obtained after in vitro equivalent dose and MN frequencies obtained fractionated therapy (in vivo). % 95 significance levels of the correlation coefficient were between 0.638 and 0.940. Application of paired t-test to data indicated that there was no statistical difference (p=0.653) between the in vitro and in vivo MN frequencies as shown below.

nuclear-medicine-BN-ratios

Figure 1: The relationship between the MN/BN ratios obtained in vitro and in vivo EWBD.

Results of paired t-test

X (average) ± SD (standard deviation) (n)

In vitro values 0.281 ± 0.082 (20)

In vivo values 0.284 ± 0.093 (20)

Average difference 0.003 ± 0.011 (20)

Statistical significance t=0.457: p=0.653

Discussion

The aim of radiotherapy is to deliver an optimal radiation dose to tumor depending on dose tolerance levels of normal tissue. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of pelvic malignancies as being a primer treatment or adjuvant treatment combined with surgery [19,20]. Effective radiation doses can be delivered to treatment areas including all pelvis. There is a rising interest in recent years towards using high doses of radiation to control tumor and to increase treatment ratios. However radiotherapy may also lead to permanent and/or temporary damage in normal tissue [21,22]. The main side effects are gastrointestinal and genitourinary symptoms [22].

Two techniques may be used in planning radiation treatment fields. One of them is the multiple field technique which reduces the amount of small intestine from treatment volume. The other technique which was used in this study is called AP/PA (anteroposterior/ posteroanterior) field technique. This technique allows more amount of small intestine to be included in treatment volume and therefore total radiation dose is generally limited to 45-50 Gy. The aim of conventional high energy radiotherapy techniques is to hold tumor integral dose lower compared to general integral dose of patient [23]. In other words, a favorable choice in patient treatment planning is to obtain the smallest integral dose for tumor.

Lower integral dose ratios are obtained when 10 MV or over radiation energies are chosen for treatment of deeply located and big sized lesions in pelvis/abdominal area [24]. When % dose levels of deeply located tumors are decreased with increasing depth, smaller integral doses which are appropriate for tumor treatment planning may be obtained. Integral doses were calculated by John’s formulation [14] in this study where Cobalt-60 gamma rays and high energy photons were used for patient’s treatment. Patient’s integral doses have been observed to increase with an increasing irradiated tumor volumes in this study (Table 2). Integral dose of one of the two patients (numbered 8 and 10 with) with larger volume was higher although their irradiated area and fraction number were the same. When the comparison was made between the results of Co-60 teletherapy machines (ATC-C9 and THR 780 E) and Linear accelerator irradiations, integral doses of patients treated by by ATC-C9 were also higher. These results might be due to technical differences of treatment machines. Not significant differences in integral doses were observed when the comparison was made between 2nd numbered patient treated by Co-60 THR 780 E and 6th numbered patient treated by linear accelerator.

Tumor dose should correctly be calculated, patient treatment setup that is planned for patient should appropriately prepared before patient starts to therapy and should also be kept unchanged during patients treatment. These activities should always be checked by the physician, physicist and technician. Any possible mistake that might occur during dose calculations and/or treatment setup may result in under or over exposure of patient. Understanding this mistake may also be possible with biological dosimetry which is based on measuring radiation induced chromosome damage. Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus method (CBMN) provides fast and economical way of measuring chromosome damage in human lymphocytes [10]. Micronucleus can be acentric chromosome fragments or a whole chromosome that can be lost during segregation [10]. There have been many studies showing the utility of the technique in biological dosimetry [3,10,12,16,17,25]. Studies that were performed with radiotherapy patients have also confirmed that MN technique is reliable and convenient technique in estimating equivalent whole body dose that patient receives during fractional treatment [9,11,26-28].

In this study, in order to check the accuracy of tumor dose calculations and treatment setups biologically, micronuclei in binucleate cells of peripheral lymphocytes taken before starting and during fractional radiotherapy applied to pelvic area tumors of 20 patients were scored. MN frequencies have been observed to increase with an increasing radiation dose in radiation dose response studies [15,29], but ratio of increases declined at 4-5 Gy of radiation doses. Encasing aberrations at high doses by any of sister nuclei or micronuclei might be responsible from this decline. In this study, therefore, equivalent whole body radiation doses were kept between 2 and 3 Gy. There was a significant relationship (r=0.847) between MN/BN ratios obtained during fractional therapy and MN/BN ratios obtained in vitro application of EWBD before start of radiotherapy (Figure 1). The evidence of significant relationship confirmed the planned radiation dose for patients had been delivered appropriately to tumor through lined treatment area on patients.

Interaction of radiation with matter in tumor irradiation is the same either in tumor cells or normal cells along radiation track, therefore ionising radiation does not discriminate neoplastic cells [22]. This interaction in normal tissue and cells is responsible from the onset of early and/or late normal tissue complications that might occur in radiotherapy. Eventually, even though transferred treatment dose to patient could be technically calculated, radiation damage occuring in lymphocytes might represent normal tissue damage. The existence of equivalancy in chromosome damage measured during radiotherapy and after application of EWBD in vitro in this study showed that patients had received planned radiation dose to tumor. In addition, patient treatment setups were inspected carefully and therefore their accuracy were confirmed during this study. But for any other therapies to be correct in delivering fractionated dose to tumor, beside proper calculation of prescribed tumor dose, it is also equally important to check patient treatment setup during radiotherapy. Because radiation that was planned to give to lined area on patient by teletherapy machine might deflect outside lined area with the same treatment portal resulting in an excepted integral dose but under dosed tumor volume. Physical control of treatment setup should be ensured carefully by clinician, radiation physicist and radiotherapy technician and it is crucially important to maintain this original setup by technician during fractionated therapy.

This study which was performed with pelvic area tumors with different tumor stages and different irradiated areas can also be performed with other area tumors to check whether treatment protocols are performed correctly.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Istanbul University, Research Fund (Project no: T-70/23072002).

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

  • World Conference on Clinical and Medical Case Reports
    Mar 16-17-2020 Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • 5th International Conference on Clinical & Medical Case Reports
    April 16-17, 2020 Amsterdam, Netherlands

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12404
  • [From(publication date):
    July-2011 - Jan 19, 2020]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8592
  • PDF downloads : 3812
Top