NPG (n=24) Low PG (n=50) Moderate PG (n=126) Severe PG (n=32) All sample (n=232) ANOVA  
  Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)  Mean (SD) Mean (SD) F p
AGE 33,7 (9,9) 31,6 (8,8) 31,1 (8,2) 30,5 (8,5) 31,4 (8,5) 0,77 0,5
  N (%) N (%) N (%)  N(%) N (%) CHI p
PROFESSIONNAL ACTIVITY         18,4 0,03*
Active 19 (79) 40 (80) 81 (64) 19 (59) 159 (68)    
Student 1 (4) 3 (6) 21 (16) 3 (9) 28 (12)    
Unemployed 2 (8) 5 (10) 22 (17) 10 (31) 39 (16)    
Other 2 (8) 2 (4) 2 (1) 0 (0) 6 (2)    
SOCIOPROFESSIONNAL CATEGORY       16,44 0,35
Farmers 1 (4) 1 (2) 1 (0,7) 0 (0) 3 (1)    
Artisans 2 (8) 3 (6) 10 (8) 2 (6) 17 (7)    
Executives 7 (29) 20 (40) 35 (27) 4 (12) 66 (28)    
Employees 7 (29) 12 (24) 34 (26) 10 (31) 63 (27)    
Workman 2 (8) 5 (8) 4 (3) 4 (12) 15 (6)    
Other 5 (20) 10 (20) 41 (32) 12 (37) 68 (29)    
FAMILY SITUATION         9,44 0,14
Couple 14 (58) 30 (60) 63 (50) 14 (43) 121 (52)    
Single 10 (24) 20 (40) 62 (49) 16 (50) 108 (46)    
Divorced 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0,7) 2 (6) 3 (1)    
Table 1: Sociodemographic data; NPG: non-problem gamblers; Low PG: low problem gamblers; Moderate PG: moderate problem gamblers ; Severe PG: severe problem gamblers; *p<0.05.