▲After painful stimulation, in Group N, compared to Group C (p=0.0022), Group ISO (p=0.0028) and Group L (p=0.032) for glutathione levels. ■After painful stimulation, in Group L+N, compared to Group C (p<0.0001), Group ISO (p<0.0001), Group L (p<0.0001) and Group N (p=0.041) in for glutathione levels. ◆After painful stimulation, in Group L, compared to Group C (p=0.043), Group ISO (p=0.042), for glutathione levels. ★After painful stimulation, in Group N, compared to Group C (p=0.0024), Group ISO (p=0.0019) and Group L (p=0.028) for catalase levels. •After painful stimulation, in Group L+N, compared to Group C (p<0.0001), Group ISO (p<0.0001) and Group L (p=0.005) for catalase levels. ✯After painful stimulation, in Group L, compared to Group C (p=0.024) and Group ISO (p=0.022) for catalase levels. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 3: Changes in glutathione and catalase levels before drugs administration and after painful stimulation. |