| |
Chinese (n=114) |
Caucasian (n=36) |
Estimated difference (95%CI) |
P-value |
| TOF 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
| Geometric mean (95% CI) |
1.6 (1.5 to 1.8) |
1.1 (1.0 to 1.2) |
|
p<0.0001 |
| Median |
1.6 |
1.1 |
0.5 (0.2, 0.7) |
|
| Range |
0.6 to 9.3 |
0.6 to 2.8 |
|
|
| Upper limit of TI |
4.3 |
2.2 |
|
|
| TOF 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
| Geometric mean (95% CI) |
1.9 (1.7 to 2.1) |
1.2 (1.1 to 1.3) |
|
p<0.0001 |
| Median |
1.8 |
1.2 |
0.7 (0.4, 1.0) |
|
| Range |
0.6 to 10.1 |
0.6 to 3.0 |
|
|
| Upper limit of TI |
5.0 |
2.4 |
|
|
| TOF 0.9 |
|
|
|
|
| Geometric mean (95% CI) |
2.3 (2.1 to 2.6) |
1.4 (1.3 to 1.6) |
|
p<0.0001 |
| Median |
2.3 |
1.4 |
(0.5, 1.2) |
|
| Range |
0.6 to 14.6 |
0.6 to 3.3 |
|
|
| Upper limit of TI |
6.4 |
3.2 |
|
|
TI, tolerance interval; TOF, train-of-four.
Estimated difference and 95% CI were obtained according to Hodges-Lehmann
and Moses.
p-values obtained from testing whether the ratio of the two geometric means is
equal to 1 (ANOVA on log- transformed recovery times) |
