AOP |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
US |
-Versatile technology
-Suitable for small volumes
-Interesting upgrade applications |
-Energy consuming technology
-Sonotrode erosion issues |
O3 |
-Strong oxidative power
-Effective for a wide spectrum of pollutants
-Existing full
-scale applications |
-Energy consuming
-High operating costs
-Risks associated to ozone generation |
O3/UV |
-More effective than O3 or UV alone |
-More energy intensive than single processes |
H2O2/UV |
-UV promote •OH formation
-High efficiency |
-Turbidity can interfere with UV radiation |
Fenton-based reactions |
-Not as energy intensive as other AOPs |
-Developing technology
-Need for acidic conditions |
UV/TiO2 |
-Can be performed at higher wavelenghts than other UV-based processes |
-Developing technology
-Need for pretreatment |