| AOP | Advantages | Disadvantages | 
       
      
        | US | -Versatile technology -Suitable for small    volumes
 -Interesting upgrade applications
 | -Energy consuming    technology -Sonotrode erosion    issues
 | 
      
        | O3 | -Strong oxidative    power -Effective for a wide    spectrum of pollutants
 -Existing full
 -scale    applications
 | -Energy consuming -High operating costs
 -Risks associated to    ozone generation
 | 
      
        | O3/UV | -More effective than O3 or UV alone | -More energy intensive    than single processes | 
      
        | H2O2/UV | -UV promote •OH formation -High efficiency
 | -Turbidity can    interfere with UV radiation | 
      
        | Fenton-based    reactions | -Not as energy    intensive as other AOPs | -Developing technology -Need for acidic conditions
 | 
      
        | UV/TiO2 | -Can be performed at    higher wavelenghts than other UV-based processes | -Developing technology -Need for pretreatment
 |