Condition Non-injured controls (n=10) Concussed participants (n=4) Significance (one-tailed probability)
Baseline (RRT, s) 0.85 (SD: 0.10) Participant 1: 0.89 t(9)=0.381, p=0.356
Participant 2: 0.53** t(9)=-3.051, p=0.007
Participant 3: 0.80 t(9)=-0.477, p=0.322
Participant 4: 0.70 t(9)=-1.430, p=0.093
VI+S (DTC, %) -15.6 (SD: 18.3) Participant 1: 28.4* t(9)=2.292, p=0.024
Participant 2: 14.6 t(9)=1.573, p=0.075
Participant 3: -6.7 t(9)=0.464, p=0.327
Participant 4: -25.8 t(9)=-0.531, p=0.304
VI+S+SH (DTC, %) -11.7 (SD: 11.8) Participant 1: 28.3** t(9)=3.232, p=0.005
Participant 2: 13.7* t(9)=2.052, p=0.035
Participant 3: 6.1 t(9)=1.438, p=0.092
Participant 4: -19.5 t(9)=-0.630, p=0.272
VI+S+OR (DTC, %) -13.1 (SD: 16.3) Participant 1: -8.3 t(9)=0.281, p=0.393
Participant 2: 11.9 t(9)=1.462, p=0.089
Participant 3: -9.0 t(9)=0.240, p=0.408
Participant 4: -35.9 t(9)=-1.334, p=0.108
VI+S+SH+OR (DTC, %) -6.4 (SD: 17.5) Participant 1: 35.9* t(9)=2.305, p=0.023
Participant 2: 28.6* t(9)=1.907, p=0.045
Participant 3: -4.8 t(9)=0.087, p=0.466
Participant 4: -20.1 t(9)=-0.746, p=0.237
VI+S+OL (DTC, %) -9.8 (SD: 18.0) Participant 1: -0.1 t(9)=0.514, p=0.310
Participant 2: 19.6 t(9)=1.577, p=0.077
Participant 3: -14.5 t(9)=-0.249, p=0.405
Participant 4: -35.2 t(9)=-1.345, p=0.106
VI+S+SH+OL (DTC, %) -11.4 (SD: 16.6) Participant 1: 17.6 t(9)=1.666, p=0.065
Participant 2: 0.3 t(9)=0.672, p=0.259
Participant 3: -1.9 t(9)=0.546, p=0.299
Participant 4: -33.1 t(9)=-1.246, p=0.122
Total (all conditions) (DTC, %) -10.9 (SD: 12.7) Participant 1: 13.4* t(9)=1.824, p=0.050
Participant 2: 13.5* t(9)=1.823, p=0.050
Participant 3: -4.6 t(9)=0.473, p=0.324
Participant 4: -25.9 t(9)=-1.126, p=0.145
*Significant difference (p ≤ 0.05)
**Significant difference (p ≤ 0.01)
Abbreviations: VI: Visual Interference Task; S: Skating; SH: Stickhandling; OR: Obstacle Avoidance to the Right; OL: Obstacle Avoidance to the Left; SD: Standard
Deviation; RRT: Response Reaction Time; DTC: Dual Task Cost
Table 4: Cognitive performance (DTC) of concussed participants compared to non-injured controls.