| Source |
SS |
Df |
MS |
F Value |
p-valuea |
| x1 |
1290.96 |
1 |
1290.96 |
55.71 |
<0.0001+ |
| x2 |
3.62 |
1 |
3.62 |
0.16 |
0.6982+ |
| x3 |
4.44 |
1 |
4.44 |
0.19 |
0.6679+ |
| x4 |
42.19 |
1 |
42.19 |
1.82 |
0.1972+ |
| x1x2 |
22.61 |
1 |
22.61 |
0.98 |
0.3389 |
| x1x3 |
5.66 |
1 |
5.66 |
0.24 |
0.6282 |
| x1x4 |
0.81 |
1 |
0.81 |
0.035 |
0.8542 |
| x2x3 |
41.86 |
1 |
41.86 |
1.81 |
0.1989 |
| x2x4 |
12.46 |
1 |
12.46 |
0.54 |
0.4747 |
| x3x4 |
217.12 |
1 |
217.12 |
9.37 |
0.0079+ |
| x1^2 |
72.71 |
1 |
72.71 |
3.14 |
0.0968+ |
| x2^2 |
298.81 |
1 |
298.81 |
12.90 |
0.0027+ |
| x3^2 |
42.99 |
1 |
42.99 |
1.86 |
0.1933 |
| x4^2 |
10.19 |
1 |
10.19 |
0.44 |
0.5174 |
|
| aThe effects marked + were used to optimize the process. |
| Table 3: Analysis of variation for Response Surface Quadratic model for inulin yield
% (before model reduction). |
