| Principles of green engineering* |
Challenges of applying biological CCU |
| I |
Inherently non-hazardous and safe. |
The use H2/O2/syngas presents explosion safety challenges to large-scale production. |
| M |
Minimize material diversity. |
Less of a biological problem. |
| P |
Prevention instead of treatment. |
Bio-wastes are inevitable in fermentation. |
| R |
Renewable material and energy inputs. |
Concentration, composition, temperature and pressure of CO2 source have direct impact on organismal growth and productivity. The same applies to energy source (e.g., light intensity and wavelength etc). |
| O |
Output-led design. |
Design of biological system is not trivial and requires sound knowledge at both molecular and system level. Robust genetic tool is lacking for modification of some organisms. |
| V |
Very simple. |
Biological system is inherently complex, highly integrated and regulated. |
| E |
Efficient use of mass, energy, space & time. |
Energy and carbon source are channelled into cell growth and biomass accumulation, instead of chemical production. Low productivity is an issue. Biological membrane could be a barrier to mass/energy transfer. Some enzymes display promiscuous activities (moonlighting). Maintaining strict anoxia for anaerobic cultivation, sparging, and cell stirring can be costly and energy intensive. |
| M |
Meet the need. |
Less of a biological problem. |
| E |
Easy to separate by design. |
Most organisms or enzymes are not tolerant to solvents used in product separation. |
| N |
Networks for exchange of local mass & energy. |
Less of a biological problem. |
| T |
Test the life cycle of the design. |
Less of a biological problem. |
| S |
Sustainability throughout product life cycle. |
Less of a biological problem. |
*Adapted from [126]