Matrix system Reinforcement Processing Characteristics Ref
Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) Recycled disposable chopsticks fibers Melt-mixing Increase in Tg of PLA; Early start of degradation process compared to that of PLA matrix; higher char yield; Markedly increased TS with the fiber content reaching the max. 115 MPa for 40% fiber content. [15]
Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) + Polyethylene glycol (PEG) Cellulose fibrils of Bleached wood pulp Solvent Casting TS of PLA + Nano fibrils 30 MPa with 2.5% elongation, lower than that of pure PLA; 28.2% increase in TS and 25% in Elongation for PLA + PEG + nano fibrils compared with pure PLA, by 56.7% and 60% compared with the PLA+ Nano fibrils of cellulose; Improved intermolecular interaction shown by FTIR study due to the existence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding among PLA, PEG, and cellulose nano fibrils. [30]
Polylactic acid (PLA), L-polylactide acid (PLLA), poly 3-hydroxylbutyrate (PHB), poly-caprolactone and starch thermoplastic, poly butylene succianate (PBS) and poly butylene adipate-co-terephtalate (PBAT) Flax fibers Film Stacking Higher TS and YM of PLLA and PLA flax composites than those of similar PP/flax fiber composites. Comparable specific TS and YM of flax fiber/PLLA composite with those of glass fiber- polyester composites. YM of PLLA-30% Flax: 9519 MPa compared to 3321 MPa for the matrix; Strain to failure: 1.5% from 2.4%; Critical strain energy: 705-1336 Gc Jm-2[Initiation & Propagation] compared to 298-282 Gc Jm-2 of glass-polyester-Balsa sandwich composite. [12]
L-polylactide acid (PLLA) Flax fiber mats (28.5%) Sand witch of Flax mat and Balsa mat Vacuum Bag Moulding Increase in FS and SS with increasing temp. (180-200oC) and increase with time (45-60 min) of manufacture; YM: 8882 MPa, TS: 65.2MPa and % Elong¨1.3, Stiffness: 23.9×10−6 Nm-2; TS: 70.5±7.2MPa. [41,42]
PLA Kenaf fibers   Unidirectional composites materials; TS, FS and YM of the composites increased linearly up to 50% with the highest TS of 223 MPa, FS: 254 MPa for 70% fiber content. [17]
Poly (Lactic Acid) (PLA), Poly (Butylene Succinate) (PBS) Bamboo fiber (BF) Compression Moulding Improved Tensile properties, water resistance, and interfacial adhesion of both PLA/BF and PBS/BF composites with the addition of lysine-based diisocyanate (LDI); Increased crystallization temperature and decreased enthalpy, heat of fusion in both composites with increasing LDI content; No significant change in melting temperature; Lower thermal degradation temperature of both composites than those of pure polymer matrix with LDI containing composites showing  higher degradation temperature than those without LDI; Faster decomposition by enzymes, but delayed  biodegradation of both composites due to the addition of LDI. [8]
Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA) Cotton, hemp, kenaf and man-made cellulose fibres (Lyocell) (40%) and mixtures of these Compression Moulding Very high TS and YM in kenaf and hemp/PLA composites; Good IS in cotton/PLA composites; high TS, YM and IS in Lyocell/PLA composites suggesting all these composites could be applied in various fields, each meeting different requirements. [23]
Mango puree-based edible films Cellulose nano fibers (CNF) (0- 36 g/100 g) Homogenize the  Mixture at 6500 rpm for 30minà Film Castingà Dry for 16 h at 22°C and 42% RH TS: from 4.06- 8.09 MPa; YM: 19.85- 322.05 MPa; %  Elong: 44.07-31.54, although without much change in it up to CNF concentrations up to 10 g/100 g. Water vapor permeability: 2.66-1.67 g. mm/kPa.h.m2àimproved water vapor barrier; low, but significant effect on Tg [-10.63 to -6.04oC]. [21]
TS: Tensile Strength; YM: Young’s Modulus; FS: Flexural Strength; FN: Flexural Modulus; IS: Impact Strength; SS: Shear Strength; Tg: Glass transition temperature;
Table 1(b): Poly Matrices-Reinforcement-Processing and Characteristics of ‘Green’ Composites