Items |
0.0 % (control) |
At Origanum vulgareextract % in the diet |
0.50% |
1.00% |
1.50% |
Feed intake |
34.10 ± 0.34c |
39.74 ± 0.22a |
38.75 ± 0.36a |
37.29 ± 0.52b |
(g feed/fish) |
FCR |
2.01 ± 0.05a |
1.67 ± 0.07b |
1.72 ± 0.06b |
1.86 ± 0.04ab |
PER |
1.81 ± 0.05c |
2.17 ± 0.08a |
2.05 ± 0.05ab |
1.94 ± 0.04bc |
APU % |
28.37 ± 0.28d |
35.73 ± 0.20a |
34.08 ± 0.32b |
32.40 ± 0.45c |
AFU % |
41.36 ± 0.40d |
50.76 ± 0.28a |
46.56 ± 0.42b |
44.14 ± 0.60c |
EU % |
17.32 ± 0.17c |
21.84 ± 0.11a |
20.63 ± 0.22b |
20.40 ± 0.21b |
|
Feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER), apparent
protein utilization (APU), apparent fat utilization (AFU) and energy utilization (EU) of
Nile tilapia fed diets containing different levels of Origanum vulgare extract. Means
the same letter (a/b/c) in the same row is not significantly different at P<0.05. |
Table 4: Feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER),
apparent protein utilization (APU), apparent fat utilization (AFU) and energy
utilization (EU) of Nile tilapia fed diets containing different levels of Origanum
vulgare extract. |