Cuscuta stem collected from

Solvent used for extraction

Methanol 80% methanol Ethanol 80% ethanol water n-hexane
A.indica 71.02cb ± 1.22 77.11bb ± 2.04 65.29db ± 1.33 82.19aa ± 2.03 61.03da ± 1.11 11.19e ± 0.89
Z.jojoba 83.01ba ± 2.10 87.49aa± 1.99 72.18ca ± 1.81 73.26cb ± 1.79 49.02db ± 1.53 20.00ea ± 0.99
M.alba 45.23be ± 1.61 51.02ae ± 1.82 42.02be ± 1.28 49.11ae ± 1.57 32.18cd ± 1.92 17.21db ± 0.62
A.arabica 51.28cd ± 1.32 56.33bd ± 1.30 61.41ab ± 1.32 59.08ac ± 2.01 43.17dc ± 2.03 23.55ea ± 1.01
A.nilotica 82.59aa ± 1.03 79.01bb ± 1.65 72.18ca ± 1.00 77.30bb ± 1.62 29.17de ± 1.74 13.29ec ± 1.32
C.latifolia 61.02bc ± 1.11 63.29bc ± 1.49 56.48cc ± 2.19 65.11ac ± 2.03 31.23dd ± 2.84 12.20ec ± 1.00
E.jambulana 47.08ce ± 1.43 51.11be ± 2.42 53.20bc ± 1.62 62.18ac ± 1.62 33.92dd ± 2.11 15.04eb ± 0.93
M. Azadirech 44.02be ± 1.81 45.31bf ± 2.71 49.37cd ± 1.63 61.22ac ± 1.93 27.04de ± 1.60 21.83ea ± 0.62
E.camaldulensis 51.27cd ± 1.06 63.01ac ± 1.49 47.38dd± 1.99 56.03bd ± 2.04 35.06ed ± 1.73 13.27f c ± 1.11
Values (mean ± SD) are average of three samples of each Cuscuta stem, analyzed individually in triplicate (n = 1x3 x 3), (P < 0.05); Superscript letters within the same row indicate significant (P< 0.05) differences of means within the extracting solvent; Subscript letters within the same column indicate significant (P< 0.05) differences of means among the Cuscuta stem collected from different host plant
Table 6: Percent inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation extracts of Cuscuta stem collected from different host plants using different solvents