Treatment Disease incidence (%) Biocontrol efficacy (%) Population of R. solanacearum intomatoplant(Log value cfu/ml) 
 
  Stem Root
R. solanacerarumUTT-25 56.43a ± 0.35 - 5.85a ± 0.03 7.45a ± 0.07
B. amyloliquefaciensDSBA- 20.81d ± 1.7 63.12 4.74d ± 0.06 6.51c ± 0.04
12+R. solanacerarum UTT-25
B. amyloliquefaciensDSBA - 17.95d ± 3.2 68.19 4.98c ± 0.17 6.50c ± 0.06
11+ R. solanacerarum UTT-25
B.subtilisDTBS-5+ R. solanacerarum UTT-25 21.63cd ± 2.5 61.67 5.02c ± 0.05 6.74b ± 0.04
B.cereusJHTBS-7+ R. 28.38b ± 3.1 49.71 5.22b ± 0.02 6.79b ± 0.11
solanacerarum UTT-25
B.pumulisMTCC-7092 + R. solanacerarum UTT-25 25.58bc ± 1.8 54.67 5.12bc ± 0.15 6.58c ± 0.15
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different as determined by LSD test (α = 0.05). Data present means of the experiment within 3 replications each.
Table 3: Reduction of bacterial wilt disease intensity and population of Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato cv. Pusa Ruby plants by applying Bacillus spp. under greenhouse conditions.