1A. Peru [75] 2009 Markov state transition model. M
1B Argentina [75] 2009 Markov state transition model. M
1C Brazil [75] 2009 Markov state transition model. M
1D Mexico [75] 2009 Markov state transition model. M
2 Mexico [56] 2009 Markov cohort model. M
3 South African Republic [61] 2009 Markov cohort model. M
4 Slovenia [47] 2010 Markov cohort model. M
5 Thailand [76] 2012 Markov. M
6 Thailand [78] 2011 Semi-Markov. M
7 Kenya. Mozambique. Tanzania. Uganda. and Zimbabwe [80] 2012 Empirically calibrated simulation model of cervical carcinogenesis.
8 Armenia. Bangladesh. Bhutan. Cambodia. Kyrgyzstan. Lao PDR. Mongolia. Myanmar. Nepal. and Pakistan [81] 2008 M A static cohort simulation model
9 India [26] 2008 Individual-based stochastic model. M
10 Brazil [49] 2007 Empirically calibrated simulation model of cervical carcinogenesis. M
11 Thailand [77] 2011 Empirically calibrated simulation model of cervical carcinogenesis. M
I Lithuania [66] 2011 Population-based transition model. D
II Hungary [53] 2010 Dynamic transmission model. D
III Brazil [38] 2007 Open cohort dynamic transmission model. D
IV Mexico [67] 2007 Dynamic transmission model. D
V Brazil [79] 2012 Dynamic individual-based model. D
Table 4: Cost-effectiveness models applied in the 25 countries.