Different rainfall conditions

S No	Plot of LMWL at site given below	δ¹⁸O and δ²H relationship local meteoric water line (LMWL)
S No	Plot of LMWL at site given below
1	Hermon	δ²H=6.02 δ¹⁸O+11.300/00, R²=0.95
2	NeveAtiv	δ²H=7.81 δ¹⁸O+22.540/00, R²=0.87
3	MaaleEfrayim	δ²H=5.09 δ¹⁸O+11.540/00, R²=0.68
4	Alon	δ²H=7.13 δ¹⁸O+11.950/00, R²=0.92
5	Ariel	δ²H=6.43 δ¹⁸O+14.910/00, R²=0.77
6	Haifa Port	δ²H=6.63 δ¹⁸O+10.470/00, a2=0.92
7	Bet Dagan	δ²H=4.96 δ¹⁸O+6.450/00, R²=0.65
8	Mevasseret Zion	δ²H=5.27 δ¹⁸O+4.880/00, R²=0.75
9	Ashdod	δ²H=5.03 δ¹⁸O+11.310/00, R²=0.86
10	Jerusalem andSoreq	δ²H=6.73 δ¹⁸O+17.330/00, R²=0.91
11	Jerusalem andSoreq	δ²H=7.26 δ¹⁸O+21.520/00, R²=0.75
12	Peqi’in	δ²H=7.07 δ¹⁸O+17.210/00, R²=0.88
13	Mikhmanim	δ²H=7.72 δ¹⁸O+17.190/00, R²=0.88
14	MakhteshQatan	δ²H=8.23 δ¹⁸O+21.600/00, R²=0.68
15	Shikmona	δ²H=5.75 δ¹⁸O+9.100/00, R²=0.88
16	Soreq caves	δ²H=5.32 δ¹⁸O+6.080/00, R²=0.85
17	Soreq caves	δ²H=7.53 δ¹⁸O+20.590/00, R²=0.87
18	Soreq caves	δ²H=6.10 δ¹⁸O+10.490/00, R²=0.83
19	Soreq caves	δ²H=7.19 δ¹⁸O+20.050/00, R²=0.84

Table 3: Different rainfall conditions and obtained LMWL.