Table1

Parameters	Group I	Group II	Group III
Body weight (g)	224.75 ± 29.40	159.6 ± 13.11^a	202.5 ± 31.81^b
Feed weight (g)	60.71 ± 7.77	49.2 ± 5.76^b	63.86 ± 8.10^a
Organs weight (g)
Liver	5.81 ± 0.50	8.50 ± 0.56^a	6.15 ± 0.21^a
Kidney	1.32 ± 0.09	1.07 ± 0.04^a	1.25 ± 0.15^b
Spleen	0.591 ± 0.03	0.724 ± 0.14^b	0.600 ± 0.08^c
Relative organ weight (%)
Liver	2.63 ± 0.52	5.54 ± 0.42^a	3.05 ± 0.35^a
Kidney	0.73 ± 0.15	0.67 ± 0.05^ns	0.72 ± 0.11^ns
Spleen	0.27 ± 0.05	0.45 ± 0.07^a	0.3 ± 0.10^b

All data are mean ± SD of each group of 10 animals. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Newman-Keuls comparison test are used to determine statistical difference between control (group I) vs paracetamol (PCM) induced hepatotoxicity group(group II) and paracetamol (PCM) induced hepatotoxicity group (group II) vs livartho treated group (group III). Where
^a ; p<0.0001(highlysignificant) ^b; p<0.001(significant) ^c; p <0.01 (significant). ^d; p<0.05 (significant). The p-values >0.05 were considered statistically non-significant.

Table1: Status of body weight (g), feed intake (g), organ weight (g) and relative organ weight (%) in PCM induced hepatic damage and Livartho treated groups.