Weakness Frequency Percentage
Poor participation of the adjacent local communities 15 13.6
Poor sense of ownership to the local communities 17 15.5
Poor direct benefits by local communities from the forest 39 35.5
Unmanageable expenses and unsustainability 3 2.7
Lack of staff for frequent field works 5 4.5
Poor participation of local community, lack of sense of ownership and poor direct benefits 16 14.6
All the mentioned above 15 13.6
  110 100.0
Table 5: Perceived weaknesses of conventional monitoring approach.