alexa Autograft Monocytes: The Bad Humors of Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-7633
Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Autograft Monocytes: The Bad Humors of Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Kerryn Ansell and Luis F Porrata*

Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Luis F Porrata, MD
Assistant Professor, Mayo Clinic
200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA
Tel: 507-284-3158
Fax: 507-266-4972
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: August 23, 2013; Accepted date: October 10, 2013; Published date: October 12, 2013

Citation: Ansell K, Porrata LF (2013) Autograft Monocytes: The Bad Humors of Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. J Stem Cell Res Ther S3:005. doi:10.4172/2157-7633.S3-005

Copyright: © 2013 Ansell K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy

Abstract

Day 15 absolute lymphocyte count (ALC-15) post-autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) is a prognostic factor for survival. ALC-15 recovery post-APHSCT directly depends on the collected and infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC). However, post-APHSCT relapses are still observed despite higher ALC-15 recovery. Recent studies have shown monocyte-derived cells affect tumor progression by suppression of host anti-tumor immunity. Monocytes are also collected and infused in patients undergoing APHSCT. Therefore this article reviews the possible immunosuppressive mechanisms of the autograft absolute monocyte count (A-AMC) affecting the host immunity and survival in patients undergoing APHSCT.

Introduction

Hematologic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) has become a vital option in the treatment armamentarium for hematologic malignancies. The initial hypothesis to support the survival benefit of HSCT relied solely on the rationale behind the use of high dose chemotherapy (HDT) to eradicate tumor cells [1]. To overcome the myelosuppressive effects of the HDT, patients are infused with stem cells to repopulate the bone marrow leading to hematologic engraftment observed by the recovery of white blood cells, red cells and platelets post-AHSCT [1]. Recent understanding of the importance of immune recovery post-HSCT has shifted the paradigm of how HSCT improves clinical outcomes. Inallogeneic stem cell transplantation, it is the current dogma that in the infused donor, allo-reactive lymphocytes produce graft-versus-tumor directly improving the survival of high-risk and/or relapse after standard treatment patients with hematologic malignancies [2]. The faster recovery of the absolute lymphocyte count at day 15 (ALC-15) after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) has been reported and confirmed to be a prognostic factor for superior clinical outcomes [3-11]. The ALC-15 recovery post-APHSCT directly depends on the amount of infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) collected during stem cell apheresis, supporting the concept of autologous graftversus- tumor effect without the detrimental effects of graft-versustumor effect observed in allogeneic stem cell transplantation [12-14]. However, relapses in post-APHSCT in patients with higher ALC-15 recovery are still observed. Recent studies suggest that the collected and infused autograftmonocytes influence immune recovery and survival by inhibiting the anti-tumor hostimmunity post-APHSCT [15].

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of cells of myeloid progenitor and immature myeloid cells involved in tumor-associated immune suppression [16]. Two main subsets of MDSCs have been proposed in humans: the granulocytic and the monocytic MDSCs [17]. The human monocytic MDSCs subsets has been characterized as monocytic CD14+ cells with low levels of lack of the antigen presenting HLA-DR molecules (CD14+HLA-DRlow/neg. cells) [17].Our group reported the presence of circulating immunosuppressive CD14+HLA-DRlow/neg peripheral blood monocytic MDSCs in patients with lymphoma [18]. These circulating CD14+HLA-DRlow/neg monocytes are recruited and transformed into tumor-associated macrophages by the tumor impacting survival in cancer patients [19-22]. Based on these findings, we evaluated if monocytes have any impact on survival in lymphoma patients treated with APHSCT. We reported that during stem cell apheresis, in addition to collecting lymphocytes, monocytes were also collected [15]. The autograft absolute monocyte count (A-AMC), when infused, was the main predictor of monocyte recovery post- APHSCT [15]. A higher day 15 absolute monocyte count (AMC-15) was associated with an inferior survival post-APHSCT [15]. We then combined the ALC-15 (i.e., a surrogate marker of host immunity) and AMC-15 (i.e., a surrogate marker of tumor microenvironment) as a ratio [15]. We reported that patients with an ALC/AMC-15 ratio ≥ 1 experienced superior survival compared to those who did not [15]. Thus, the importance of the balance between host immunity (i.e., ALC-15) and tumor microenvironment (i.e., AMC-15) for the clinical outcomes of patients treated with APHSCT was brought into question. Furthermore, AMC-15 recovery directly depends on the amount of infused A-AMC, which may lead to abrogation of the immunologic anti-tumor effect of a higher ALC-15 recovery post-APHSCT [15]. For example, monocyte-induced immune tolerance appears to be caused by a period of “transient immunodeficiency” [23], accompanied by a simultaneous “state of enhanced activation” by post-APHSCT monocytes. This state is characterized by the secretion of unusually large quantities of kynurenine by monocytes post-APHSCT, triggered by even the slightest stimuli. Thus, this magnified stimulationinduced kynurenine secretion by post-APHSCT monocytes may be one of the possible mechanisms of the monocytes’ documented suppressor activity, causing T-cell inhibition through apoptosis [23]. Furthermore, we recently reported in Hodgkin lymphoma patients in complete remission at day 100 post-APHSCT superior survival with a higher ALC/AMC ratio at day 100 (ALC/AMC-100) compared with those with a low ALC/AMC-100 by landmark analysis from day 100 arguing in favor on the concept of post-APHSCT immunosurveillance by balancing the interaction between host immunity (i.e., ALC) and tumor microenvironment (i.e., AMC) [24]. In addition, the ALC/ AMC ratio obtained from the standard complete blood cell count provides a simple standardized test to assess the interaction between host immunity and tumor microenvironment in comparison to geneexpression profiling with the practical limitation of requiring fresh frozen tissue samples to analyze and in patients in complete remission like the patients included in our study [24] no tumor samples are available to biopsy to provide a dynamic real-time interaction between host response and tumor. Therefore, this article reviews the possible mechanisms of the immunosuppressive effects of A-AMC affecting the autograft versus tumor effect in patients undergoing APHSCT.

MDSCs mechanisms of immune effector cells suppression

T-cell lymphocytes inhibition by immunosuppressive cytokines: MDSCs at the tumor site can differentiate into tumorassociated macrophages (TAMs). TAMs acquire the ability to produce immunosuppressive cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL- 10, transforming growth factor-β (TCFβ), and tumor-necrosis factoralpha (TNF-α) [17]. In the allogeneic stem cell transplantation setting IL-6 and IL-10 has been positively correlated with the CD14+ HLADRlow/neg cells [25]. Specifically in APHSCT, two immunosuppressive cytokine produced by MDSCs/TAM had been identified from the autograft absolute monocyte count (A-AMC) collected during stem cell collection: IL-10 and TNF-α. Singh et al. [26], reported high levels of IL-10 mRNA produced by the A-AMC in the autograft stem cell collection product, directly correlating with T-cell inhibition activity as well as decreased phytohemagglutinin (PHA) stimulation of the autograft T-cells collected and infused when compared with normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells. High levels of mRNA TNF-α have been documented in the autograft products for patients undergoing APHSCT produced by the A-AMC [26]. Antibodies directed against TNF-α were able to abolish the autograft T-cells inhibitory activity produced by this monokine from the A-AMC [26].

Alteration of antigen recognition and activation: MDSCs produce elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [16-17] including peroxynitrite (ONOO-) and upregulate signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activity. This is associated with an increase in arginase 1 activity and low levels of nitric oxide (NO) production [16-17]. MDSCs can take up, process and present antigens to antigenspecific CD8+ T cells. During cell to cell interaction, MDSCs disrupt the biding of specific peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) dimers to CD8+ T cells through nitration of tyrosines by the production of peroxynitrite, leading CD8+ T cells unable to response to specific peptide [27]. In allogeneic stem cell transplantation, down regulation of the expression of CD3ζ-chain has been reported by indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) produced by CD14+ HLA-DRlow/neg. cells [25]. Blocking IDO restored the CD3ζ-chain expression as well as increased production of interferon-ϒ, thus T cell activation [25]. No studies are currently available in the APHSCT setting; nevertheless, it is reasonable to hypothesize a similar process of T-cell immunosuppression by the A-AMC could occur.

Induction of regulatory T-cells: In vivo studies have described the ability of MDSCs to promote the induction of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) regulatory T (Treg) cells [28-29]. The induction of Treg by MDSCs required IL-10, arginase 1, and the capture, processing and presentation of tumor-associated antigens by MDSCs [30]. In a recent study in multiple myeloma patients mobilized with high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-SCF) for APHSCT identified high levels in the autograft of CD4+ CD25high Treg expressing high levels of FOXP3, CTLA-4, and GITR and displaying in vitro suppressive properties [31]. Further studies are warranted to see if A-AMC/MDSCs have any impact in the induction and sustained production of Treg in APHSCT.

MDSCs-T-cell Fas/Fas-Ligand (FasL) interaction: In vivo studies have shown MDSCs to express the death receptor Fas [32]. Activated T-cell expressing FasL induces apoptosis in MDSCs identifying a mechanism of regulating MDSCs levels. This finding suggests a retaliatory relationship between T-cells and MDSCs in relation to MDSC s suppressing T-cells activation; however, once activated T-cells mediate MDSCs apoptosis [32]. In APHSCT, autograft A-AMC FasL expression is found in significantly greater amounts compared to controls. Studies on these increased quantities of FasL have suggested that these activated FasL-expressing monocytes interact with activated Fas+ CD4+ T lymphocytes, causing apoptosis and leading to the destruction of CD4+ T cell populations, about 28-51% of CD4+ cells [33-34]. CD8+ cells, unlike CD4+ T cells, do not express elevated quantities of Fas expression and are possibly less targeted by FasL+ monocytes to the same degree as CD4+ cells; this results in a preferential deletion of post-APHSCT CD4+ T-cells and ultimately a shift in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio [35]. FasL+ monocytes deplete CD4+ cells”, thus rendering CD8+ cells inactive, and contributing to the suppression of the host immunity in APHSCT.

Autograft monocytes and Natural killer (NK) cells: Greater NK cell counts have been correlated with higher ALC-15 recovery and found to be the key lymphocyte subset at day 15 post-APHSCT predicting clinical outcomes [36]. In the presence of A-AMC, NK cells are found to be significantly decreased. A study conducted by Ageitos et al. [37], documented this NK cell decrease in APHSCT autografts, and demonstrated that the presence of A-AMC affects both the function and proliferation ability of NK [37].

Stem Cell Mobilization in APHSCT

Both Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) have been used to mobilize and collect the desired quantity of CD34+ stem cells to proceed with APHSCT [38-39]. Recent studies have found that the products of the stem cell transplant autografts mobilized by C-CSF or GM-CSF have a much greater quantity of CD-14+ monocytes than controls [39]. Studies of monocyte-associated suppressive activity revealed a direct relationship between the number of CD14+ cells and suppressor cell function in mobilized cell products [40] and the characterization of the cells as monocyte lineage [40] up to 40% of the cells in the autograft of mobilized stem cell products by G-CSF/GMCSF are shown to be a CD14+ myeloid cell [41] and up to 10% of the peripheral blood leukocytes following APHSCT [42] were identified as CD14+ suppressive activity [33]. In addition to G-CSF and GMCSF, Plerixafor is in current use for the mobilization of CD34+ stem cells for APHSCT. Mechanism of action of plerixafor is attributed to be a reversible and transient disruption of the interaction between the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand chemokine CXCL12 (previously known as stromal derived factor 1) which is accompanied by a rapid (8-11 hours) release of CD34+ cells from the bone marrow niche into the circulation [43]. Our group reported that Plerixafor can also mobilized lymphocytes leading higher autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) collection affecting clinical outcomes post-APHSCT [44]. Recently, Plerixafor has been shown to mobilize monocyte affecting the numbers of A-AMC [45]. Further studies are needed to identify if Plerixafor mobilized immunosuppressive CD14+HLA-DRlow/neg monocytic MDSCs.

Conclusion

This article reviewed mechanisms associated with the negative immunosuppressive effects of A-AMC/MDSCs that may impact the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing APHSCT. In the allogeneic stem cell transplantation setting, the adoptive transfer of MDSCs improves the alloreactivity in preclinical graft-versus-host disease [25]. Thus, the use of MDSCs is an attractive idea in allogeneic stem cell transplantation in conjunction with Treg and mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies to minimize the side effects of graft-versus-host disease. However, in APHSCT, the immunosuppressive effects of A-AMC/MDSCs possibly mediated through: 1) the production of IL- 10 and TNF-α; 2) the induction of Treg; 3) Fas/Fas-Ligand activation resultingin T-cells apoptosis; and 4) the down regulation of NK cell activity and proliferation, mostlikely explaining the inferior clinical outcomes of patients achieving a high AMC-15 and low ALC-15 recovery post-APHSCT (see Figure 1).

stem-cell-research-therapy-Autograft-Absolute-Monocyte

Figure 1: Possible Immunosuppressive mechanisms of Autograft-Absolute Monocyte Count (A-AMC)/Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs). This schematic diagram depicts possible immunosuppressive mechanisms of A-AMC/MDSCs including the production of immunosuppressive cytokine; disruption of the major histocompatability complex class 1 receptor causing T-cels to become unresponsive to antigen-specific; Fas-FasLinteraction leading to T-cell apoptosis; induction of regulatory T-cells; and inhibition of natural killer (NK) cells function/proliferation. Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating-Factor (G-CSF), Granulocyte- Macrophages Colony Stimulating-Factor (GM-CSF) and ± Plerixafor mobilized higher numbers of monocytes in the peripheral blood of patients leading to higher numbers of aphorized and collected A-AMC.

The identification of the negative prognosis based on the A-AMC provides a new incentive to minimize A-AMC collection with the hope to improve survival post-APHSCT, as the current stem cell mobilization agents (G-CSF, GM-CSF and possibly Plerixafor) has been associated with the mobilization of immunosuppressive monocyte leading to higher collection of A-AMC. These observations give a platform to develop autograft engineering therapies to minimize the collection and infusion of immunosuppressive A-AMC/MDSCs in the APHSCT setting. Carbonyl-iron column suspension has been a commonly preferred method of removing CD-14+ monocytes, and would be ideal for our proposed method of intervention. In column suspension, a magnet is introduced and results in cell suspension; because monocytes contain high percentages of iron, they are attracted to the magnet and can easily be isolated and removed. In studies that used this same method [37], the removal of A-AMC resulted in the expansion and restoration of autograft T and NK cells immunologic function and proliferation. Therefore, the removal of CD-14+ A-AMC from autograft products by column-suspension during mobilized apheresis may provide an avenue to improve immune recovery and reduce treatment failure post-APHSCT.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11668
  • [From(publication date):
    specialissue-2013 - Aug 23, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7882
  • PDF downloads :3786
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords