Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
The term “osteological paradox” has been used to disparage research derived from skeletal collections [1]. Their explanation: After all, the animal died, so its remains are not representative of the species? This unproven speculation could be correct if observation of the phenomenon of interest were to be affected by the agonal event. Speculation has been offered that wild “harvested” animals may not be representative, as perhaps they were slower or less effective at hiding than other members of their species who got away.
Spanish 
Chinese 
Russian 
German 
French 
Japanese 
Portuguese 
Hindi