alexa Childhood Immunization Refusal: The Return of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2157-7560
Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Childhood Immunization Refusal: The Return of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases

Eunha Shim*

Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Eunha Shimi
Department of Epidemiology
Graduate School of Public Health
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
Tel: (412) 383-8085
Fax: (412) 624-7397
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: Novemer 30, 2012; Accepted date: December 05, 2012; Published date: December 07, 2012

Citation: Shimi E (2012) Childhood Immunization Refusal: The Return of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. J Vaccines Vaccin 3:e115. doi: 10.4172/2157-7560.1000e115

Copyright: © 2012 Shimi E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination

Vaccines are considered the most effective prevention tools against infectious diseases, and routine vaccination in the U.S. has led to successful suppression of many such diseases. In fact, vaccinepreventable diseases such as smallpox, polio, diphtheria, mumps and rubella occur at rates that are less than 1% of what they were during the pre-vaccine era [1]. In fact, immunization requirements for school entry in the U.S. date back to 1855 [1], and they have effectively protected students from many vaccine-preventable diseases. Therefore, high vaccine coverage levels have resulted in herd immunity throughout the population, thus greatly reducing or eliminating continual endemic transmission of a number of diseases.

Due to such drastic reductions in the incidence of vaccinepreventable diseases, however, the memory of several of these dangerous, infectious diseases has faded from public consciousness. A lack of personal experience with diseases like measles and pertussis has led certain parents to focus on vaccine-adverse events and to refuse vaccination [2]. Studies have linked increases in vaccine refusal to parents’ concerns about the safety, efficacy and side effects of the vaccines, and to a perception that children’s immune systems could not handle the number of vaccines administered simultaneously [3-6]. Specifically, 26% of parents preferring alternative schedules (compared to the schedule recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) for vaccinating their children were reported to have refused the MMR vaccine for their child, while a further 54% delayed this vaccine [5].

Such vaccine refusals have resulted in a decrease in vaccine coverage, which has led to a number of outbreaks of measles and pertussis in the U.S. According to the 2009 National Immunization Survey, 25.8% of parents with children aged 24-48 months delayed one or more recommended vaccine doses for their children, 8.2% refused one or more recommended vaccine doses, and 5.8% both delayed and refused vaccines [5]. Vaccine coverage among the children of parents who delayed and refused was found to be significantly lower for nine of the ten recommended childhood vaccines including diphtheriatetanus- acellular pertussis (65.3% vs. 85.2%) and measles-mumpsrubella (68.4% vs. 92.5%) [5].

In 2000, the measles virus was eliminated from the U.S. as a result of successful implementation of measles vaccination programs. However, since then, vaccine refusal combined with importations of measles into the U.S. has resulted in measles outbreaks. In 2011, 17 measles outbreaks were reported to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and a total of 222 people in the U.S. contracted measles, the most documented cases in a single year since 1996 [7,8]. Of the 222 cases, 112 (50%) were associated with the 17 domestic outbreaks, and 200 (90%) were associated with importations from other countries. Most of the patients (86%) were unvaccinated or had unknown vaccination status. Of the 17 measles outbreaks in 2011, the Minnesota outbreak was the largest outbreak in the US since 1991 [7,9]. The outbreak originated when a 30-month-old toddler returned from a trip to Kenya. The toddler directly infected three others at a day-care facility, and subsequently additional individuals were exposed, including seven infants who were too young to receive MMR vaccine [7,9]. Many infected children during this outbreak in Minnesota were unvaccinated due to parental concerns about MMR vaccine safety [7].

Another large measles outbreak occurred in San Diego, California in 2008. This outbreak began when an intentionally unvaccinated 7-year-old boy who was unknowingly infected with measles returned from Switzerland. The importation resulted in the largest outbreak in San Diego since 1991, exposing 839 persons and infecting 11 (all unvaccinated children) [10]. In the 2008 outbreak of measles in San Diego, California, half of the cases occurred among children whose parents refused vaccination for their children on philosophical or religious grounds [5]. Many parents of this population believed that vaccinations could cause autism in their children [11]. Furthermore, it was found that the San Diego outbreak was attributable to clusters of intentionally unvaccinated children [10]. Recently, there have been numerous other measles outbreaks, such as in Tucson, AZ [11]; Los Angeles County, CA [12]; and in Western and Central Pennsylvania [13,14].

In addition to the suffering caused to these children, treatment and prevention of these outbreaks can carry unfavorable economic costs: up to $25,000 in the case of a single infected foreign refugee in the US [15]. During the Tucson outbreak, two hospitals spent approximately $800,000 treating seven patients [11]. Remarkably, it costs only $78 to vaccinate an individual for measles [16].

Similarly to the US, Canada eliminated endemic measles transmission at the close of the 90s. Five years ago, however, Canada endured its first outbreak since 2000. The outbreak manifested through several unrelated networks of unvaccinated people, lasted 25 weeks, and resulted in 94 cases of measles [17]. Overseas countries such as the United Kingdom have been striving to eliminate endemic measles transmission but are held back by low vaccination uptake in children. In Merseyside, UK, a vaccination uptake of only 85% for the second dose in children younger than five has led to the largest outbreak in the northwestern UK since 1996 [18]. The outbreak began in January 2012 and as of June 30th 359 confirmed and 157 probable cases of measles were reported [18]. Only 3% of the vaccine-eligible confirmed cases were fully immunized. As a result of this outbreak, existing vaccination initiatives in the area have been intensified [18].

Pertussis is another vaccine-preventable disease whose spread in the U.S. is enabled by vaccine refusal. More than 32,000 cases of pertussis were reported in 2012, the largest occurrence in 12 years [19]. Recent outbreaks and high rates of pertussis were reported in Washington, Colorado, Minnesota, and Wisconsin [19]. Risk factors for contracting pertussis include incomplete vaccinations and waning immunity [20-22]. Unlike measles, immunity from the pertussis vaccine begins to wane 5 to 10 years after completion of the childhood immunization schedule, thus leaving adults and adolescents at high risk [21]. Still, unvaccinated children are eight times more likely to contract pertussis than vaccinated ones [23]. Similarly to measles, clusters of intentionally unvaccinated children exist in the U.S. Previous studies have indicated that the risk of community-level pertussis outbreaks is greatly increased by the presence of these geographically concentrated exemptors [24,25]. Another study found higher risk of pertussis associated with exposure to exemptors in school outbreaks, as well as higher incidence of pertussis among vaccinated children living in counties with exemptors [25].

In order to understand the impact of vaccine exemptions on the potential resurgence of once-eradicated infectious diseases, mathematical models of vaccination behavior have been developed [2,26-29]. These studies show that vaccine refusal not only increases the individual’s risk of disease but also increases the risk for those who cannot be vaccinated due to medical conditions, those too young to be vaccinated, and those who were vaccinated but did not mount an immune response due to vaccine failure. Major reasons for vaccine refusal in the U.S. are parental concerns about the safety of vaccination as well as a lower level of concern about the risk of infection. Therefore, if the vaccination levels necessary to achieve the population’s herd immunity are to be maintained, increased efforts will be needed to educate the public on vaccine safety and infection risks.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11710
  • [From(publication date):
    December-2012 - Nov 25, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7921
  • PDF downloads : 3789
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords