alexa Comparative Evaluation of Biochemical Changes in Different Safflower Varieties (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Water Deficit | OMICS International
ISSN: 2157-7110
Journal of Food Processing & Technology
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Comparative Evaluation of Biochemical Changes in Different Safflower Varieties (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Water Deficit

Sadia Javed1*, M Yasin Ashraf2, Saqib Mahmood3, Shazia Anwer Bukhari1, Munazzah Meraj4 and Abida Perveen3

1Department of Applied Chemistry and Biochemistry, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

2Nuclear Institute of Agriculture and Biology, Faisalabad, Pakistan

3Department of Botany, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

4Department of Biochemistry, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences, Nawabshah, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author:
Sadia Javed
Department of Applied Chemistry and Biochemistry
Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan
Tel: +92-333-6510755
Fax: +92-41-8505391
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Received date: August 06, 2013; Accepted date: October 21, 2013; Published date: October 30, 2013

Citation: Javed S, Ashraf MY, Mahmood S, Bukhari SA, Meraj M, et al. (2013) Comparative Evaluation of Biochemical Changes in Different Safflower Varieties (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Water Deficit. J Food Process Technol 4:270. doi:10.4172/2157-7110.1000270

Copyright: © 2013 Javed S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Food Processing & Technology

Abstract

Studies to determine drought induced biochemical changes in safflower and their utilization in identifying stress tolerant genotypes were conducted under water deficit (60% field capacity) conditions at Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Nitrate Reductase (NRA) and Nitrite Reductase (NiRA) activities, total soluble proteins, DNA contents, fresh and dry biomass of plant and plant yield were adversely affected by drought stress in all safflower genotypes. However, genotypes Thori 78 and PI-387820 showed less reduction in these attributes. Total free amino acids, reducing, non reducing sugars and total sugars increased in all genotypes under drought stress. Comparison among safflower genotypes indicated that V1 (with greater biomass, yield, high NiRA, proteins and DNA level) performed best under drought stress followed by V6 (with high NiRA, proteins and unsaturation/saturation level). V3 proved itself poorer upon the basis of growth and biochemical parameters. From the results it can be concluded that biochemical markers can be used to select drought tolerant safflower genotypes.

Keywords

Nitrate and nitrite reductase activities; DNA; Osmoregulators; Fatty acids; Drought

Introduction

Pakistan has been constantly and chronically deficient in major food products including edible oil production. According to PARC [1] about 70% of the domestic requirements are met through imports and import of edible oil which is increasing at the rate of 12.5% annually in early 1970s and the trend will further not only continue but will also get worsen with increase in population. However, efforts have been being made to increase its local production.

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is one of the prospective oilseed crops, because it yields about 32-40% seed oil [2]. Its oil is widely utilized in industries mainly as edible and dying purposes. One of the most important aspects for safflower seed production is related to rapid emergence and good seedling establishment in the field [3]. Safflower is moderately stress tolerant crop and can withstand under extreme conditions of drought. It is an excellent forage plant, which is palatable and has feeding value (crude value and total digestible nutrients) and yields are similar to or better than cereals and alfalfa. Safflower stubble is highly desired by cattle, sheep and goat [4]. In Pakistan safflower is grown on residual moisture following a rice crop [5]. In recent years, considerable attention has been generated in the consumption and development of safflower seed oil as an excellent health care product and health benefits derived from it including prevention and treatment of hyperlipidemia, atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease [6].

Intensive use of natural resources by increasing the world population causes environmental problems (such as salinity and drought). These environmental stresses contribute significantly in reduction of crop yields well below the potential maximum yields [7]. Among various environmental stresses, water is the most important component of life and it is rapidly becoming a critically short commodity for humans and crop production [7,8].

Keeping in view the importance of safflower as an oil seed crop and drought as major constrains in getting its optimum productivity, studies were conducted to investigate the biochemical changes which can be used as markers to identify drought tolerant and high yielding safflower genotypes to fulfill the edible oil requirement of the country.

Materials and Methods

Studies were conducted in pots in wire-house under natural conditions at Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, Pakistan with six safflower genotypes (PI-387820, PI- 251978, PI-170274, PI-387821, PI-386174 and Thori-78) using two water stress (100 and 60% field capacity) levels. Plastic pots having capacity of 8 kg filled with alluvial soil (analyzed according to the methods given in Hand Book No. 60 US Salinity Lab Staff; summarized in Table 1) were used in this study. After completion of germination two treatments i-e Control (with 100 % field capacity) and Drought (60% field capacity) were imposed. Drought was imposed by maintaining the field capacity of soil up to 60% through weighing the pots daily and adding the measured amount of evaporated water (characteristic of irrigation water are given in Table 1. This practice was carried out throughout the duration of study. When the plants were of 95 days old, leaf samples were collected for the determination of biochemical changes. For the estimation of fresh and dry biomass, one plant was uprooted carefully from each pot, washed with distilled water, dried with filter paper and fresh weight was measured then place in an oven at 70 ± 2°C for 72 hours and dry weight was estimated on a scientific digital balance.

  Soil Characteristics Irrigation water Characteristics
Soil texture Clay loam -
ECe(dS m-1) 2.41 0.77
pHs 7.76 7.9
Organic matter (%) 0. 4 -
NO3-N (mg kg-1) 14.7 7
P  (mg kg-1) 11 -
K (mg kg-1) 78 0.7
Ca+Mg (meq L-1) 15 3
CO3  (meq L-1) Nil Nil
HCO3  (meq L-1) 3.5 2

Table 1: Characteristics of soil and irrigation water used in this study.

Reagents and standards

All analytical grade chemicals were purchased from either sigma- Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland) or E. Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

Determination of biochemical changes

Enzymes: Nitrate and nitrite reductases activities (NRA and NiRA) were studied using fresh leaf material of treated and untreated plants by following the methods of Sym [9] for NRA by Ramarao et al. [10] for NiRA.

Sugar: Immediately after harvesting, fresh leaf samples are chilled out to 0°C and then frozen to-40°C. Sugars were extracted in from 0.1 g chopped leaf sample in 10 mL of 80% ethanol (v/v) by shaking it overnight. Reducing, non-reducing and total sugars were estimated from the above extract as described by Riazi et al. [11].

Total protein, amino acid and DNA: Fresh leaves were homogenized in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7) and filtrate was used for the determination of protein, total free amino acids and DNA. Total proteins were estimated using the method of Lowry et al. [12] and total free amino acids were determined as described by Hamilton and Van Slyke [13]. DNA contents were estimated as according to Hoogendoom et al. [14].

Fatty acid: Oil from 1 g of seeds of each variety was extracted in n-hexane through mechanical method using metallic rod to press the seeds. Vials containing seeds were shaked for 30 minutes on a forward and back shaker and then centrifuged. Supernatant containing oil was recovered, solvent was evaporated and oil was esterified for gas chromatographic analysis. Methylation of fatty acids in the extracted oil sample was carried out according to the procedure described by Wang and Stute [15] with some modifications. Gas chromatography (GC-17A Shamadzu) having conditions, DB-Wax column 30 m long 0.25 mm inside diameter and flame ionization detector was used for fatty acid profile determination. The temperature of the thermostat was 140°C for 5 min 240°C at 4/min but the temperature at injection time was 260°C at 150psi pressure and Helium served as carrier gas with a flow rate of 30 mL/min.

Statistical analysis: Statistical significance of the differences between mean values was assessed two way analysis of ANOVA under CRD and DMR test using Minitab 2000 version 13.2 statistical software (Minitab Inc., Pennsylvania, USA). A probability value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered to denote a statistically significant difference [16].

Results

Biochemical changes

Nitrite Reductase Activity (NiRA) decreased in all the varieties under drought stress but among all the safflower genotypes PI-387820 (V1) and Thori-78 (V6) maintained the highest NiRA under drought stress conditions (Figure 1A) while its minimum level was noted in PI- 170274 (V3) closely followed by PI-386174 (V5).

food-processing-technology-nitrate-reductase

Figure 1: Comparison of nitrite (A) and nitrate reductase (B) activity in different safflower varieties under water deficit.

Nitrate Reductase Activity (NRA) was significantly reduced due to drought stresses (Figure 1B). However, different genotypes responded differently to drought. Both the stresses had significant effect on NRA of all the six genotypes. Only PI-386174 (V5) maintained under stress however all genotypes showed overall trend of reduction. The minimum reduction was in PI-170274 (V3) where it is 24% followed by PI-387820 (V1) and Thori-78 (V6). Moreover maximum reduction was in PI-251978 (V2) and PI-387821 (V4) that is up to 55 and 47% respectively.

Total soluble protein significantly decreased due to drought in all safflower genotypes (Figure 2A). The highest reduction as compared to control in soluble protein was noted in V4 and V3 while V1 and V6 proved themselves better with minimum reduction in content of total soluble proteins.

food-processing-technology-total-soluble-proteins

Figure 2: Comparison of total soluble proteins (A) free amino acids (B) and DNA content (C) in different safflower varieties under water deficit.

Concentrations of Total Free Amino Acid (TFA) were significantly affected by drought stress in safflower genotypes (Figure 2B). The safflower plants growing under normal conditions had less TFA contents than those growing under drought stress conditions. All genotypes of safflower showed a significant increase in TFA with the exception of V5 that maintained the level of TFA under stress. The concentration of TFA in safflower variety/genotype V1 was significantly higher than all other genotypes both under controlled and stressed conditions. Safflower genotype V4 was next in performance regarding TFA. Minimum rise in TFA level was noted in V6.

DNA contents in all varieties of safflower significantly reduced by drought stress (Figure 2C). Genotypic comparison indicated that safflower genotype V1, V3 and V5 showed less reduction in DNA content than others. The reduction in DNA content in V1 was 1.43 μg g-1 FW under drought stress whereas it was more than 2 μg g-1 FW in V2, V4 and V6.

Sugars accumulation significantly increased under stress as compared to controlled conditions in all the safflower genotypes (Figure 3). Under controlled conditions V3 showed minimum level of total soluble sugars and non-reducing sugars but in stressed conditions it showed sharp rise in the level of sugar accumulation leading its level comparable to other genotype However, accumulation of sugars was significantly higher in safflower genotype V3 followed by V2 and V5. All safflower genotypes showed an increase in reducing sugars under stressed conditions. However, V1, V2 and V5 showed greater accumulation of reducing sugars.

food-processing-technology-reducing-sugars

Figure 3: Comparison of reducing sugars (A) non-reducing sugars (B) and total sugars (C) in different safflower varieties under water deficit.

Drought stress significantly influenced the concentration of total soluble sugars in safflower genotypes. Plants growing under environmental stresses generally showed increase in sugars, betaine and proline.

Fatty acid, oleic acid was the highest in V3 while PI-251978 (V2) and V3 have high linoleic acid but low oleic acid (Table 2). All varieties showed a decrease in palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acid except V3, which showed a remarkable increase in oleic acid contents under drought but over all varieties, exhibited a decrease in oil contents and change in fatty acid composition. Drought stressed significantly reduced unsaturation to saturation ratio in V1 and V5 however it was improved in V2, V3, V4 and V6 (Figure 4).

food-processing-technology-saturated-fatty-acids

Figure 4: Comparison of saturated (A) unsaturated (B) and unsaturated/ saturated fatty acids (C) in different safflower varieties under water deficit.

Genotypic Code Designated Name of Genotype Palmitic acid C16:1
(% of Oil Content)
Stearic Acid C18:0
(% of Oil Content)
Oleic acid C18:1
(% of Oil Content)
Linoleic Acid C18:2
(% of Oil Content)
Treatments Treatments Treatments Treatments
    Control Drought Control Drought Control Drought Control Drought
PI-387820 V1 06.96o 7.75h 1.20o 1.55j 13.00j 09.53p 78.84h 81.18d
PI-251978 V2 07.57k 6.50p 1.66i 1.37m 09.27q 08.75r 81.50c 83.39a
PI-170274 V3 10.11a 8.55d 1.94f 2.41c 19.34b 17.07c 68.61r 76.98m
PI-387821 V4 08.45e 7.67i 2.41c 1.55j 13.33i 12.86k 75.81o 77.92j
PI-386174 V5 07.23m 8.58c 1.25n 1.96e 09.83o 20.42a 81.67b 69.03q
Thori-78 V6 08.31f 7.01n 1.42k 1.40l 11.93l 14.17f 78.35i 77.42l

Table 2: Comparison of fatty acids profile of different safflower varieties under water deficit.

Growth

Fresh and dry biomass and yield were significantly reduced due to stress in all the safflower genotypes. Under drought condition maximum reduction over control in fresh biomass was recorded in safflower genotype V4 (56%) while it was minimum V5 (27%) closely followed by V6 (29%) (Table 3).

Genotypic Code Designated Name of Genotype Fresh weight Plant-1 Dry weight Plant-1 Yield Plant-1
Treatments Treatments Treatments
    Control Drought Control Drought Control Drought
PI-387820 V1 33.69j 18.55p 10.795h 4.095r 1.479l 0.843r
PI-251978 V2 46.26d 22.35n 14.693d 7.935n 2.091h 1.025o
PI-170274 V3 52.11c 30.84m 15.917a 6.437q 3.623b 2.121g
PI-387821 V4 36.79h 15.86r 12.950e 7.936m 2.202f 0.957p
PI-386174 V5 52.35b 38.09g 14.703c 8.937l 2.631d 0.944q
Thori-78 V6 56.47a 39.76f 15.730b 6.440p 4.212a 2.529e

Table 3: Comparison of plant growth of different safflower varieties under water deficit.

Dry biomass was also adversely affected by salinity and drought in all safflower genotypes (Table 3). Under drought condition reduction in dry biomass was very severe in all safflower genotypes but it was the highest in V1 (62%) followed by V3 (59%), V6 (59%), V2 (45%) and V5 and V4 (39%).

Seed yield was significantly reduced in all safflower genotypes under drought conditions (Table 3). The highest reduction in seed yield was noted in V5 (64%) followed by V4 and V3 whereas minimum reduction was showed by V6 (39%).

Discussion

Drought adversely affects plant growth and productivity of all the safflowers genotypes (Table 2). Plants adapt themselves by altering different physiological and biochemical processes to adjust the environmental stresses [17]. Literature indicated that salt results in huge losses in plant productivity by reducing plant growth [8] in almost all the plants. But it was minimum in tolerant crop varieties [8] as observed in V6 and V1 (Table 2).

Under drought stress nutrient imbalance was often observed in plants which cause inhibition in protein synthesizing, delay in enzyme solubilization and reduction in enzymatic activities (Figures 1A and 1B). Reduction in NO-3 uptake, NRA and NiRA under salinity has been reported by many researchers [18,19]. Reduction in NO-3 concentration and uptake is may be due to the antagonistic effect of Cl- due to NaCl salinity and disruption of root membrane integrity [20-23]. Nitrogen assimilation is a fundamental biological process that occurs in plants and has marked effects on plant productivity and biomass. Nitrate reductase is the key enzyme that catalyzes the first reaction in the NO3 assimilation pathway [24,25]. So, the reduction in NRA may lead the decrease in NiRA which is observed in the present study (Figures 1A and 1B). Nitrate has to be reduced to ammonia in order to synthesize the structural component of the biological system. The whole process is as follows:

equation

So, reduction of NO3 into NO2 by NRA is the key and rate limiting step in nitrogen assimilation. In above indicated reactions the any disturbance in NRA and NiRA may affect the nitrogen metabolism [19,26].

The stresses cause disturbance in N assimilation resulting reduction in proteins which is observed in all safflower genotypes (Figure 3). Decrease in soluble proteins is may be due to breakdown of proteins by proteolytic process under salinity or drought stresses [27] consequently total amino acids increased in all safflower genotypes (Figure 4). Accumulation of amino acids reduces the osmotic potential which facilitates the inward movement of the water [28,29]. Reports indicated that these amino acids are used to synthesize the necessary proteins and other molecules to support growth [30]. However, some studies revealed a significant increase in soluble proteins in response to stresses [19]. These proteins are may be the stress proteins which are developed in plants cope with unfavorable environment conditions.

Drought significantly decreased DNA contents in all tested safflower varieties (Figure 2C) which may be disturbance in protein and nitrogen metabolism as observed by [31] in different wheat genotypes. As DNA and RNA are responsible for protein synthesis, therefore, disturbance in nucleic acid metabolism may cause disturbance in protein metabolism which is very clear from the findings of present study (Figure 2C). However, there are a series of genes, such as those encoding for osmolytes and ion channels which prevent the damage in response to stresses [32]. Both types of stresses adversely affected all the safflower genotypes, but V6 (THORI-78) had potential to tolerate the adverse environmental conditions, so it produced higher biomass and yield.

Sugars contents increased due to imposition of stress in all safflower genotypes. In plants, under abiotic stress conditions accumulation of sugars (reducing, non-reducing) is reported which allowed the plants to adjust osmotically [33]. Plants have been attributed an adaptation by increase in carbohydrate level in response to stresses. In addition to osmoregulators soluble organic compounds may act as osmoprotectants for protein under stresses [29].

Safflower oil comprised linoleic (approximately 75%), oleic (13%), palmitic (6%) and stearic (3%) acids [32]. Stressful environmental conditions not only lower the oil content it also alters the fatty acid composition [34]. In present research differential effect upon fatty acid synthesis was observed by different varieties. The linoleic, oleic and linolenic acids are the fatty acid, which affect the quality of oil. Safflower is an oil seed crop and two types of safflower oil were reported those containing high monounsaturated fatty acid such as oleic acid (used as heat stable cooking oil) and those containing high polyunsaturated fatty acids such as oleic acid (used as cold oil). Drought modified fatty acids composition and ultimately the food quality and it is considered to be very important in stress tolerance of plants [35]. Moreover extent of unsaturation of fatty acids is correlated with potential of photosynthetic machinery to tolerate stress. Generally abiotic stress induces inactivation of PSII and PSI [36] and unsaturation of fatty acids in membrane lipids shelter PSII and PSI as one of effective protective strategy. Where it affect dually; alleviating the damage to PSI and PSII and improving the healing of injury [36-38]. Amongst genotypes better unsaturation level was maintained by V2, 3, 4, 6 under drought conditions. Fatty acid composition is generally affected by genotype [39] and environmental conditions, particularly the level of unsaturation. Water stress causes a rise in oleic acid [40]. Similar were the findings of present research for V5 and V6 but reverse was true for other safflower genotypes. Amongst saturated fatty acid (palmitic and stearic acid) in sunflower, palmitic acid concentration has been noted to be increases in less water availability (with 0.39 to 0.74%) and stearic acid concentration lowers under drought (up to 1.33). Water stress lowers the level of oleic acid and raises the linoleic (up to 14%).

Conclusion

From the findings of present study it can be concluded that changes in the levels of biochemical metabolites, i.e. NRA, NiRA, DNA, sugars, soluble proteins and total free amino acids can be used to identify the safflower genotypes having potential to tolerate drought.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12302
  • [From(publication date):
    October-2013 - Feb 21, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8490
  • PDF downloads : 3812
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version