Previous Page  22 / 35 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 35 Next Page
Page Background

Page 74

Notes:

conferenceseries

.com

Volume 8, Issue 5 (Suppl)

J Chromatogr Sep Tech, an open access journal

ISSN: 2157-7064

Chromatography 2017

August 07-09, 2017

August 07-09, 2017 | Rome, Italy

4

th

World Congress on

Chromatography

Advantages of using a microfluidic-chip as sample treatment miniaturization for a subsequent

analysis by HPLC

María Ramos Payan

Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona IMB-CNM (CSIC), Spain

Statement of the Problem:

The most critical stage of the analytical process is the preparation of the sample requiring different

stages prior to analysis, long extraction times, large volumes of reagents, etc., with the objective of obtaining a good clean-

up for the analysis by instrumental techniques (as HPLC). Nowadays, one of the dominant trends in sample preparation is

miniaturization and automation. In this paper, we present the advantages presented by the use of microfluidic systems in this

field. These devices allow working in different configurations depending on the nature of the analyte to be extracted: either by

liquid phase micro-extraction or by electro membranes.

Methodology:

Our group has demonstrated the possibility of on-line and off-line analysis by HPLC. Two pumps are used

to introduce the sample and the acceptor phase into the microfluidic device. The microfluidic device is fabricated using

two patterned plates of poly (methyl methacrylate), which are symmetrical. The channels are separated by a polypropylene

membrane. For off-line analysis, the acceptor outlet (extract) is collected and injected directly into a HPLC. For on-line

analysis, the acceptor outlet is connected to the HPLC.

Findings:

This type of device provides high selectivity, clean-up, reduces sample volume and low consumption of reagents,

significantly reduces time of analysis and has demonstrated its ability to online coupling with HPLC. Additionally, the

microchip-devices are reusable (allow membrane exchange) and each membrane is stable during more than 10 consecutive

micro extractions.

Conclusion & Significance:

The miniaturization and automatization of sample treatment procedures (on-chip) offer

multiple advantages compared with existing traditional techniques. It also, offers excellent clean-up either with biological or

environmental samples and significantly reduces the time of analysis from the sample collection till data obtaining.

Biography

María Ramos Payan has expertise in “Improving sample preparation techniques focused on microfluidic-chip devices as miniaturization”. The novelty of her

microfluidic devices offer more advantages than the existing methodologies. The devices work either using biological and environmental samples and can be

coupled on-line to HPLC or mass spectrometry. She has also demonstrated the applicability of microchip devices for diagnostic diseases as diabetes. She has

worked at different institutions (University of Seville, University of Huelva, University of Lund, University of Copenhagen and University of North Carolina, USA).

Currently, she works at Microelectronic National Center of Barcelona and Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona with the aim of implementing optical detection into

microfluidic devices for multiple different applications.

ramospayan@us.es

María Ramos Payan, J Chromatogr Sep Tech 2017, 8:5(Suppl)

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7064-C1-032