alexa Development of [EU]-Gtp Binding Assay for Selection of Histamine H3 Receptor Agonist and Antagonists | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-1009
Biochemistry & Analytical Biochemistry
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Development of [EU]-Gtp Binding Assay for Selection of Histamine H3 Receptor Agonist & Antagonists

Jitendra Kumar Singh1*, Reema C. Maniyar1 and Vikas S. Shirsath2

1In vitro Pharmacology Laboratory, India

2Oxygen Healthcare Research Pvt. Ltd., Plot-35, Pancharatna Industrial Estate, Sarkhej Bawla Highway, Changodar, Ahmedabad, Gujarat-382213, India

*Corresponding Author:
Jitendra Kumar Singh
In vitro Pharmacology Laboratory India
Tel: +91-2717656415
Fax: +91-2717250262
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: April 17, 2012; Accepted Date: August 23, 2012; Published Date: August 27, 2012

Citation: Singh JK, Maniyar RC, Shirsath VS (2012) Development of [EU]-Gtp Binding Assay for Selection of Histamine H3 Receptor Agonist & Antagonists. Biochem Anal Biochem 1:114. doi: 10.4172/2161-1009.1000114

Copyright: © 2012 Singh JK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Biochemistry & Analytical Biochemistry


Alzheimer’s disease; Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders; Histamine H3; Central Nervous System (CNS); GSK189254; 6-[(3-Cyclobutyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepin-7-yl)oxy]-Nmethyl- 3-pyridinecarboxamide hydrochloride; Europium labelled Guanosine -5’-triphosphate; High-throughput screening.


The neurotransmitter Histamine exerts a wide range of biological functions, including neurotransmission, inflammation, smooth muscle contraction, dilation of capillaries and gastric acid secretion [1]. These effects are mediated through four G-protein-coupled receptor subtypes [2]: H1, H2, H3 and H4. The H1 and H2 receptors are involved with the allergic response and gastric acid secretion, respectively [1]. The H4 receptor is predominantly expressed in mast cells, and critically involved in the regulation of inflammatory and immune responses [3].

The Histamine H3 receptor was discovered in 1983 by Arrang and colleagues, using classic pharmacological approaches [4]. It has been identified in the both central nervous system (CNS) as well as the peripheral nervous system as a presynaptic receptor controlling the release of histamine [4]. It is also recognized as a heteroreceptor on non-histaminergic neurons that are capable of regulating the release of many other neurotransmitters, such as acetylcholine, nor-epinephrine, dopamine and serotonin [5].

The H3 receptor is expressed predominantly in the central nervous system (CNS), with highest expression in the amygdala, substantia nigra, cerebral cortex and hypothalamus [6]. These brain regions have been associated with cognition (cortex and hippocampus), sleep and homeostatic regulation (hypothalamus) [7]. The CNS effect of the H3 antagonists make them valuable candidates for the treatment of obesity, epilepsy and age-related memory disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) [8]. The histamine 3 receptor has been shown to couple with heterotrimeric Gi/o proteins and identified several signal transduction pathways activated by the receptor [9]: inhibition of adenylate cyclase, activation of phospholipase A2, activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and Akt/glycogen syntase kinase-3β pathways, inhibition of calcium influx through voltage-gated calcium channel.

In this regard assessing GPCR activation by GTP binding is an important tool to study the early stage of signal transduction. Previously this has been done using the radiolabeled non-hydrolyzable GTP analogue [35S] GTPγS [10]. On the other hand, because of inherent limitations associated with working with radioactivity, there is an obvious advantage to adapting the GTP binding to a non- radioactive format.

Time-resolved fluorescence technology exploits the unique fluorescence properties of lanthanide chelates. It has few advantageous like low back ground and high-signal to noise ratios [11]. In TRF, emission of the fluorescent label having a long decay time is recorded with a delay of about 0.4 ms after excitation, when the nonspecific fluorescence has died out, resulting in an excellent signal-to-noise ratio and thus extreme sensitivity, comparable to or even exceeding that of the radioactive compounds [12]. The high-throughput format of the TRF assay makes the Eu-GTP-binding assay ideal for GPCR-targeted drug discovery [13] and has been applied on membrane preparations containing various GPCRs such as α2A-adrenergic [14], neuropeptide [15], dopamine [16], muscarinic [17], and chemokine receptors [18].

In this present study, we describe the Eu-GTP binding assay for H3 receptor. We have employed Eu-GTP binding assay as part of our in vitro pharmacological characterization of novel H3 ligands. This assay protocol is also employed during each step in the development and optimization of a high-throughput assay. Typically, the assay development was started by determining the optimal receptor protein concentration followed by optimizing specific assay components (MgCl2 GDP, NaCl, saponin and dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]). Once the assay was developed, it was assessed for HTS compatibility by determining the critical factors reproducibility and signal to noise discrimination which govern the screening capability of the assay. Data generated using this assay is comparable with the [35S] GTPγS, with the advantages and convenience of a non-radioactive assay.

Materials and Methods


Histamine, R(-)-α-methylhistamine dihydrochloride, imetit dihydrobromide, immepip dihydro bromide, clobenpropit dihydrobromide, thioperamide maleate, GDP, saponin, ascorbic acid, bovine serum albumin (BSA), magnesium chloride and GTPγS were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Proxyfan oxalate was procured from Tocris Bioscience (UK). GSK 189254 was synthesized and provided by Oxygen Healthcare Research Private Limited. Eu-labeled GTP a fluorescent chelate was obtained from PerkinElmer’s DELFIA Eu-GTP binding kit (product number AD0260) (Boston, MA). Human recombinant Histamine 3 receptor membrane protein was obtained from PerkinElmer. HPLC grade water was procured from Milli-Q water system (Millipore, USA). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade and proven purity.


Analysis was performed on Victor3™ 1420 Multilabel counter (Perkin Elmer). Software for controlling the system was Wallac 1420 version 3.0. Multichannel pipettes and single channel pipettes were of Eppendorf. Dilution of standard agonist and antagonists was done in Corning 96 well V bottom plate. Filtration and analysis of the compounds was performed in Acrowell™ 96 well filter membrane bottom plates (GHP membrane) were from Pall Life Sciences (USA). MultiScreenHTS Vacuum Manifold (Millipore) unit was used to filter out free Eu-GTP. Assay incubation was done in the Boekel Jitterbug microplate incubator shaker.

Histamine 3 Receptor Eu-GTP binding assay

The Eu-GTP binding assay was performed according to Frang et al. [14] and as suggested by the manufacturer for the DELFIA Eu-GTP binding kit (PerkinElmer). Human recombinant H3R membranes (1 Unit, 15 μg/mL.) were pre-incubated in the 96-well V bottom stock plate (Corning) for 15 minutes at 30°C in final volume of 0.2 mL with 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, supplemented with NaCl, MgCl2, saponin, BSA, GDP and 50 μL of desired concentration of agonist in the wells. After pre-incubation of 15 minutes on the plate shaker the reaction was started by addition of Eu-GTP to a final concentration of 3 nM and was further incubated for 30 minutes at 30°C. After completion of the incubation the reaction mixture was transferred in Acrowell™ 96 GHP filter plates (Pall). The assay was terminated by vacuum filtration (MultiScreen Vacuum Manifold, Millipore), followed by two washes with ice-cold buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 & 10 mM MgCl2). Plates were immediately allowed to Victor3™ 1420 Multilabel counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) to measure the bound Eu-GTP with the membrane. The plate was read using the factory set protocol for europium measurements (340 excitation/615 nm emission, 0.4 ms delay and 0.4 ms window). Nonspecific binding was determined by the inclusion of reagent listed above plus a final buffer concentration of 10 μM GTPγS.

Data analysis

Data were measured as Europium GTP binding counts and percentage over basal level was calculated by using the following equation, the nonspecific binding (average) counts were subtracted from each data point:

% Over basal = ((Stimulated Signal (average)*100) / (Basal Signal (average))-100

Inhibitor potency (EC50) was calculated using a 4-parameter, variable-slope, nonlinear iterative curve fitting provided by Prism® (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA.) The EC50 values of individual agonists were calculated using the normalized percentage of maximum response.

The KB values of antagonists were calculated using the following equation:

KB = EC50 / (1+ [Ligand Concentration] / Kd)

And the Z factor was calculated using the equation by Zhang et al. [19].

Z’ factor = 1- ([3* SD of Max Signal + 3* SD of Min Signal] / (Mean of Max Signal – Mean of Min Signal)

Where SD of Max Signal and SD of Min Signal are the corresponding standard deviations of Mean of Max Signal and Mean of Min Signal.

Results and Discussion

In the mentioned research effort, the first stage of assay development was to determine the binding of Eu-GTP to membranes containing H3R to obtained significant difference between the basal binding activity and imetit stimulated samples. Typically four independent experiments in triplicate were performed; the basal level with 3 nM Eu-GTP was 6115 ± 231 (mean ± SD) counts in 30 minute, the stimulated level with 100 nM Imetit was 17776 ± 361.87 counts, and nonspecific binding was obtained in the presence of 10 μM GTPγS was 2238 ± 111 counts, resulting in 191 ± 5% over the basal level. This indicates the specific binding activity of the Eu-GTP to H3R- coupled G proteins. Eu-GTP binding was also tested with control membrane protein (non transfected CHO cells). Membrane from non-transfected cells did not show any stimulation of Eu-GTP binding with 100 nM Imetit, thus further confirming the specific binding of Eu-GTP.

Optimization of the Eu-GTP binding assay

The assay optimization steps were adapted from the PerkinElmer Delfia GTP binding protocol. The initial titration matrix for the each point was done in triplicate. A baseline control without agonist was included for each time point of the titration. A final concentration of 100 nM Imetit was used to activate the receptor.

Optimization of MgCl2 and GDP concentration:The concentration of MgCl2 and GDP was optimized by cross-titration on a 96-well Acro Well filter plate in concentration ranging from 0.1-10 μM GDP and 1-10 mM MgCl2 as suggested by Perkin Elmer. We have prepared concentration matrix with final assay concentration of 1, 3, 5 and 10 mM MgCl2 that was cross titrated with 0.1, 1, 3 and 5 μM GDP, keeping the NaCl concentration constant (100 mM) in 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4 as reaction buffer for human H3R. Figure 1 shows the comparison of the stimulation caused by 100 nM imetit in different buffer conditions with membrane expressing H3 receptors. The maximum percentage over basal values was found with 3 μM GDP and GDP effect was increased with increasing MgCl2 concentration. Therefore, 3 μM GDP and 10 mM MgCl2 were selected for further assay development.


Figure 1: Optimization of the MgCl2and GDP concentrations for the H3R Eu-GTP assay.

Optimization of NaCl concentration: Similar protocol (used to optimize MgCl2 and GDP concentration) was used to optimize NaCl concentration in the assay. We have selected 5 different concentration of NaCl in the range from 20 to 200 mM. For this, NaCl stock solution were prepared with the recommended final assay concentration in 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4, by keeping the concentration of GDP (3 μM) and MgCl2 (10 mM) constant. The effect of Na+ concentration on stimulation of H3 receptor caused by 100 nM imetit is represented in Figure 2. The best percentage over basal ratio was found with 130 mM NaCl concentration.


Figure 2: Optimization of the NaCl concentration for H3R Eu-GTP binding Assay.

Optimization of saponin concentration: Saponin is a mild detergent, which can improve the GTP binding to H3 receptor, was tested within a range from 0-300 μg/mL. The stock solution of saponin with the recommended final assay concentration was made in 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 with the constant concentration of MgCl2 (10 mM), GDP (3 μM) and NaCl (130 mM). Figure 3 depicts the effect of saponin concentration on imetit induced binding of GTP-Eu to H3 receptor. The optimal signal was found with 100 μg/ml of saponin and this concentration was used in the subsequent steps of the assay development.


Figure 3: Optimization of Saponin concentrations for the H3R Eu-GTP binding assay.

Optimization of H3 membrane concentration in the binding assay: In all previous optimization steps, 15 μg (1 Unit) of H3R membrane per well was used, which is a fairly high amount of protein per well for the antagonist screening purpose. Therefore, we tested smaller protein amounts per well, and Figure 4 shows that even 1.62 μg provided reasonable percentage over basal (96%) values compared with 15 μg per well (170). We have performed the binding assay to obtain optimal % over basal, upto 30 μg per well and the best % over basal ratio was found with 7.5 μg/well.


Figure 4: Effect of membrane protein concentration on % over basal values in the H3R Eu-GTP binding assay.

Validation of the Eu-GTP binding assay using known agonists: To further validate the Eu-GTP binding assay, 5 H3R agonist previously screened in a radiometric ([35S] GTPγS) assay were tested. These agonists were selected with a wide range of affinity, which includes pEC50 value from low nM to High nM. As shown in the Table 1, Figure 5 the pEC50 values for the 5 agonists were very similar to those determined in the isotopic [35S] GTPγS functional assay [19].

Ligand Eu-GTP [35S]GTPγS
Imetit 9.03±0.11 8.82±0.07
Immepi p 9.44±0.01 9.29±0.07
R(-)-α-methylhistamine 8.85±0.08 8.57±0.01
Proxyfan 8.36±0.12   8.3±0.10
Histamine 7.55±0.07 7.46±0.04
GSK189254 9.90±0.11 9.06±0.02
Clobenpropit 9.00±0.02 9.28±0.06
Thioperamide 8.26±0.10 8.12±0.01

Table 1: Dose-response isotherms of ligands were analyzed by non-linear regression. Agonist potency is expressed as pEC50. The antagonist potency to inhibit Eu-GTP binding induced by 100 nM Imetit is expressed as ΡKB. Results are presented as means ± S.E.M. of at least three independent experiments.


Figure 5: Dose –response curve of agonist-induced binding of Eu-GTP to H3R, investigated with 5 different H3R agonists.

DMSO tolerance study: To adapt the assay for antagonist selection, a DMSO tolerance study was performed. The H3R activity was not significantly affected by up to 3% DMSO (data not shown). The antagonist screening was then conducted at 2% DMSO.

Adaptation of Eu-GTP binding assay for H3R antagonists selection: The aim of these modifications to the assay is to use it to screen the H3R antagonists. In order to utilize the assay for this purpose the H3R membranes were pre-incubated with agonists and antagonists for 15 minutes before the addition of Eu-GTP in the 96-well V bottom assay plate (Corning), by keeping other components constant. The potencies of H3R receptor antagonists (GSK 189254, Clobenpropit and Thioperamide) were determined for antagonism of imetit-mediated inhibition of Eu-GTP binding to human H3 receptor. The data was analyzed in nonlinear regression mode to obtain PKB values by using Graph pad Prism software which is shown in Table 1, Figure 6. These values are in close agreement with previously published data [20].


Figure 6: Antagonism of Imetit-stimulated Eu-GTP binding: [Antagonist concentration-inhibition curves for antagonism of 100 nM Imetit responses by GSK 189254, Clobenpropit and Thioperamide.] The data shown are the average of at least three experiments (± SEM), each with three determinations per condition.

Z’ Determination: To be of use in agonist and antagonist screening, the assay must fulfill other criteria in that it must be reproducible, give data comparable to the gold standard radiometric assay, and be free of interference from test compounds. To address these points, the Z’ value for the assay, the standard measure of reproducibility and signal-to-noise discrimination, were determined [19]. The Z’ value is obtained by conducting back ground and maximum stimulation for multiple times across assay plate on separate days. The data shown in Figure 7 gives calculated Z’ factor of 0.847. These excellent scores indicate that this assay is viable for use in high throughput screening.


Figure 7: Z’ factor estimation for Eu-GTP binding assay.


We have presented data showing that time resolved fluorescence (TRF) based Eu-GTP binding assay is an excellent format for the selection of H3R agonist and antagonists in that it provides a simple homogeneous format that is more affordable, less time consuming, amendable to automation and scalable to any assay volume required. However, identification of appropriate assay for the characterization of agonist and antagonist of histamine 3 receptor presents a challenge for the GPCR functional assay development and impedes progression of the target in drug discovery program. Although, radioactive assay ([35S] GTPγS) had been developed for the selection of H3R agonist and antagonist, disposal costs and potential for the contamination of HTS facilities restricts the use of radioactive binding assay for screening purpose. The assay has an advantage over the radiometric assay, as it has long fluorescence lifetime and can detect less than one attomole of europium in a multiwall plate sample.

The assay, when compared with the gold standard radiometric formats for histamine 3 receptor functional assay, gives comparable Z’ values and in actual screening trials gave nearly identical results to those of the radiometric assay.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • 3rd International Conference on Biochemistry & Molecular Biology May 16-17, 2018 Singapore Theme: Novel Advancements in Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
    May 16-17, 2018 Singapore City, Singapore
  • 3rd International Conference on Molecular Biology & Nucleic Acids August 27-28, 2018 Toronto, Ontario, Canada Theme: Molecular Biology & Nucleic Acids - The Blueprint of Life
    August 27-28, 2018 Toronto, Canada
  • 4th International Conference on Biochemistry & Biophysics October 03-04, 2018 Los Angeles, California, USA Theme: Lets Make Every Molecules Count
    October 03-04, 2018 Los Angeles, USA
  • International conference on Biomolecules, Membrane Sciences and Technologies October 16-17, 2018 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Theme: Biomolecules- A Connecting Innovation in Science
    October 16-17, 2018 Ottawa, Canada

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11701
  • [From(publication date):
    September-2012 - Mar 20, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7933
  • PDF downloads : 3768

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version