alexa Dietary Supplements in Management and Prevention of Chronic Disease | OMICS International
ISSN: 2161-0509
Journal of Nutritional Disorders & Therapy
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Dietary Supplements in Management and Prevention of Chronic Disease

Michael B Zemel*

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Michael B. Zemel, Ph.D
Professor Emeritus
The University of Tennessee
Chief Scientific Officer
NuSirt Sciences, Inc. 11020
Solway School Road, Suite 109
Knoxville, Tennessee 37923, USA
Tel: +865-206-6154
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: December 21, 2012; Accepted date: December 21, 2012; Published date: December 24, 2012

Citation: Zemel MB (2013) Dietary Supplements in Management and Prevention of Chronic Disease. J Nutr Disorders Ther 3:e107. doi:10.4172/2161-0509.1000e107

Copyright: © 2013 Zemel MB. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nutritional Disorders & Therapy

Dietary supplement use for both general health and specific applications has been steadily growing, and more than 50% of adults in the US now use at least one supplement daily. This is accompanied by an often well-deserved dose of healthy skepticism on the part of the health care and research communities. However, despite our ambivalence, the pages of many biomedical journals, including this one, continue to fill with reports demonstrating robust in vitro and in vivo bioactivity of select food components and complex extracts as well as a smaller number of clinical trials validating disease-specific applications.

So, with an abundance of high quality scientific literature supporting significant bioactivity of multiple food components, what are the reasons for a generalized distrust of dietary supplements for prevention and management of disease? Clearly one component must be a discomfort with the overwhelming abundance of minimally regulated, poorly supported (or completely unsupported) claims and implications driven by marketers rather than by sound science. However, even conservative, evidence based claims are generally met with skepticism in the nutritional science community. This is a community with a cornerstone belief in the value of healthy diets (despite our disagreements surrounding what constitutes a healthy diet), rather than utilizing food components in a medicinal fashion.

And yet, we continue to investigate food-derived bioactivity and to proclaim its potential value in our grant applications and our published manuscripts. It is now time to take an active role in translating these studies, both positive and negative, into useful, practical approaches that can be utilized as a benchmark for assessing supplement claims. Let us use Resveratrol as an example. This polyphenol, found in the skin of red grapes and other fruits, has been widely demonstrated to serve as a Sirt1 activator, mimicking the effects of energy restriction on lifespan and multiple metabolic outcomes, including diabetes [1-5]. However, most of these effects are only achieved at very high doses that are difficult to obtain in humans, while limited bioavailability and rapid metabolism make achieving therapeutically effective plasma levels a significant challenge. Consequently, promising results from cellular and rodent studies with very high concentrations of this polyphenol are not easily translated to human outcomes, and more reasonable doses have been reported to have little or no effect [6]. However, this has not prevented extensive marketing of resveratrol at doses unlikely to provide meaningful effects. Notably, some (albeit a minority) dietary supplements offer demonstrated efficacy with the doses used in the formulations, but these risks are getting lost in the larger universe of questionable supplements.

The Nutritional Science community has a role to play in helping both health professionals and consumers that navigate this universe. As a starting point, here are some modest principles to be considered for benchmarking supplements:

• Claims must be based upon sound science, using accepted, standardized approaches;

• Clear scientific rationale and cellular mechanism of action must be demonstrated;

In vitro data is necessary, but by no means sufficient. The literature has numerous examples of promising approaches demonstrated in the in vitro systems that fail when applied to animals and humans.

In vivo demonstration of safety and efficacy in the target population must be presented using the same doses as used in the products when marketed. The nutrition literature has demonstrated the efficacy of several plant derivatives in the prevention/management of chronic diseases using doses that are difficult or impossible to obtain; those same derivatives are then marketed at much lower doses with reference made to the “high dose” literature. Resveratrol supplements are one such example of this problem, and cinnamon applications in diabetes are another. These create both practitioner and consumer confusion, as there is indeed validation studies, but not using the doses in the supplements.

• Key data must be available for scrutiny in peer-reviewed scientific publications for public and scientific scrutiny.

Consistent application of these simple benchmark principles by the Nutritional Science community is the first step towards restoring the confidence of both clinicians and consumers that there is appropriate alignment between the data and the claims. Translating our science into practical use demands that this scientific community undertake the task of utilizing this framework to systematically evaluate dietary supplements and periodically provide the results of this evaluation to the broader community.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

  • Annual Physicians Meeting 2018 May 11-12, 2018 Osaka, Japan
    May 11-12, 2018 Osaka, Japan
  • Natural Medicine & Products September 24-25, 2018 Montreal | Quebec | Canada
    September 24-25, 2018 Montreal, USA

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11828
  • [From(publication date):
    January-2013 - Dec 16, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8014
  • PDF downloads : 3814
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version