alexa Differential Expression of Rac-1, Cxcr4 and CCR5 on CD4 T-Cells at Different Stages of HIV-1 Disease Relate To Its Progression in Therapy Naive Individuals | Open Access Journals
ISSN 2155-6113
Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Differential Expression of Rac-1, Cxcr4 and CCR5 on CD4 T-Cells at Different Stages of HIV-1 Disease Relate To Its Progression in Therapy Naive Individuals

Jaideep S Toor1,3, Aman Sharma2, Sukhdev S Kamboj3 and Sunil K Arora1*

1Department of Immunopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India

2Departments Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India

3Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar- Punjab, India

*Corresponding Author:
Sunil K Arora, Professor
Department of Immunopathology
PGIMER, Chandigarh-160012, India
Tel: +91-172-2755192
Fax: +91-172-2744401
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: March 13, 2013; Accepted Date: April 29, 2013; Published Date: May 03, 2013

Citation: Toor JS, Sharma A, Kamboj SS, Arora SK (2013) Differential Expression of Rac-1, Cxcr4 and CCR5 on CD4 T-Cells at Different Stages of HIV-1 Disease Relate To Its Progression in Therapy Naïve Individuals. J AIDS Clin Res 4:207. doi:10.4172/2155-6113.1000207

Copyright: © 2013 Toor JS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research


Background: HIV-1 uses different co-receptors (CCR5/CXCR4) at different stages of disease to enter target cells. Any information in understanding this mechanism has important implication on both, the rate of disease progression and our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of this disease.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 67 treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected individuals. The expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 on T-cell subsets was evaluated in the peripheral blood of patients at different stages of HIV disease, active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), HIV/PTB co-infection and healthy controls, to assess their possible role or association with change in Treg frequency during the disease progression. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of Rac1 expression in relation to functionally active CXCR4 and NF-κB expression.

Results: Significantly higher CCR5 expression on CD4+CD25high Treg cells in HIV-1 subjects in early stage of the disease correlated well with initial decrease in Treg frequency. On the contrary, higher CXCR4 expression on CD4+CD25low/negative T-cells (non-Treg cells) in advanced stage of disease explained the shift to X4 type with faster progression to AIDS. This shift is further supported by initial significant decrease in Rac1 expression in early disease followed by returning to normal expression with disease progression. Interestingly, PTB co-infection correlated significantly with increase in CCR5 expression on Treg population only, at the same time favoring increase in CXCR4 expression on CD4+CD25low/negative subset.

Conclusion: The study indicates novel inter-relationships of co-receptor expression and their regulatory genes in therapy naïve individuals and how the virus manipulates the host machinery to its advantage. The Rac-1 seems to regulate not only the functional conformation of CXCR4, but also the expression of both FoxP3 and NF-κB genes there by affecting the disease progression in HIV subjects. These findings need further attention to look at their clinical implication and disease outcome in a larger study.


HIV-TB co-infection; CCR5/CxCR4 co-receptors; HIV disease progression; Co-receptor utilization; T-regulatory cells


Human Immunodeficiency virus, HIV-1 initiates infection via viral envelope (Env) glycoprotein gp120 interacting with cell surface CD4, followed by its association with a co-receptor that triggers the fusion of viral and host-cell membranes. Two chemokine receptors, CCR5 and CXCR4 are the predominantly known co-receptors for HIV-1 in vivo. All HIV-1 strains are classified phenotypically as R5 (Macrophage tropic), X4 (T-cell tropic), or R5X4 (dual tropic i.e. both M-tropic and T-tropic) depending on whether they preferentially utilize cysteinecysteine receptor 5 (CCR5) orcysteine-X-cysteine receptor 4 (CxCR4) or mixed [1]. This inter-conversion of tropism requires only a small number of changes in the Env V3 region. In early stage of HIV infection, only about 15% are dual/mixed tropic and is dominated by CCR5 tropism [2,3]. While in later stages of the disease, dual/mixed or pure CxCR4 tropism reaches up to 60% [4], and is highest in patients with CD4 ≤ 200 cells/μl [5,6].This may vary with the prevalence of HIV-1 subtype in a region. Why there is selective advantage of CCR5 tropic viruses in establishing HIV-1 infection, switching over to CxCR4 utilization in the advanced stage of disease, is not clearly understood yet. This tropism switch has been associated with rapid disease progression and poor clinical prognosis [7-9]. Besides preferentialCxCR4-utilizing virus, there may be other factors also playing crucial role in faster disease progression and needs a closer look. It has earlier been indicated that Rac1,a small (~21 kDa) signaling G protein a member of the Rac subfamily of the Rho family of GTPases, is important to maintain the functional conformation of CxCR4 receptor [10], and could be one of the candidate molecules that could possibly play an important role in preferential co-receptor utilization by the virus.

Normal cell functioning of host is altered by invading viral proteins to the benefit of the virus [11]. There have been constant efforts to understand these interactions between viral and cellular gene products which together determine the host’s susceptibility to infection and disease progression in HIV-1 infection [12]. Working on few such molecules for their behavior in HIV-1 disease progression and M. tuberculosis co-infection, we have tried to analyze the role of HIV- 1 co-receptors, CCR5 and CxCR4, variant 2 (shorter splice variant) of CxCR4, Rac1 (which is required to maintain CxCR4 in the responsive conformation) [10], NF-κB which has high affinity binding sight on long terminal repeat (LTR) enhancer region of HIV-1 and regulates HIV replication [13-16], and FoxP3 which enhances HIV-1 gene expression by modulating NF-κB occupancy at the LTR in human T-cells line [17].

Materials and Methods

Patients and controls

The study was conducted on different cohorts of individuals including 27HIV-1 infected patients, 12 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infected patients (PTB), 8 HIV-1/Mtbco-infected patients (HIVPTB), and 20 healthy controls (HC). HIV-1 infected patients confirmed by the blood sample being reactive by three rapid tests, as per National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) guidelines were enrolled from the Integrated Counselling and Testing Centre (ICTC) in the Department of Immunopathology, PGIMER, and Chandigarh, India. At the time of recruitment, the patients were interviewed by a counsellor to obtain informed consent and ascertain therapy naïve status. The status of disease was assessed by absolute CD4 cell count by flow cytometry using BD Tritest™ containing antibody conjugates CD3-FITC/ CD4-PE/CD45-PerCP with BD Trucount™ tubes (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA). PTB and HIV-PTB patientsconfirmed positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis by chest x-ray, sputum smear positivity and TB-PCRwere recruited from DOTS centre, in our hospital.The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India and peripheral blood was obtained from enrolled subjects after an informed consent. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from heparinised blood by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation (HiMedia, Mumbai, India).

Treg Immunophenotyping

Freshly isolated PBMC were immunophenotyped for Treg number, FoxP3 expression per cell (MFI) and CCR5/CXCR4 expression using fluorophore-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAb): anti-CD4 PE/ FITC, anti-CD25 PE-Cy7, anti-CCR5 PE, and anti-CxCR4 PE (all from BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) for cell surface markers in combination with intracellular Fork-head box protein 3 (FoxP3) mAb conjugated with Alexa488 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). Samples were acquired into a flowcytometer (FACS Calibur, BD, USA) and analyzed using cell-Quest software (BD Bioscience). For further analysis patients were categorized on the bases of level of surface CD25 expression on CD4+ T-cells: CD4CD25high (top 2% with highest CD25 expression), CD4CD25intermediate (middle 15% with intermediate CD25 expression) and CD4CD25low/negative (lower 83% with very low or no expression of CD25) cells (Figure 1). Isotype controls were performed for each sample. Absolute counts for different populations were calculated from the total lymphocyte count in the whole blood.


Figure 1: CD4+CD25high Treg in peripheral blood samples by analysis of surface CD25, CCR5, CXCR4 and intracellular FoxP3 on CD4 T-cells. Representative three-color flow cytometric analysis of CD4+CD25high [2%] and CD4+CD25intermediate [15%] and CD4+CD25low/negative [83%] T-cells from HIV subject. For analysis plots, template of both mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] data and percentage positive data [% of cells expressing a particular antigen] were used.

T-cell proliferation assay

To examine the functional defects of T-cells in these cohorts, proliferative capability of T cells was assessed on stimulation with mitogen-PHA (phyto-heamagglutinin) by determining the extent of 3Hthymindine incorporation. Briefly, 1 × 105 PBMCs/well were plated into 96-well plates in triplicates in complete RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 20 IU/ml penicillin, 20 μg/ml streptomycin, 25 mM HEPES, and 2 mM L-glutamine for 96 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2, either in presence or absence ofPHA (10 μg/ ml) as stimulant. Eighteen hours prior to termination of the culture, 1μ Ci of 3H-thymidine (BARC, India) was added to each well. The cells were then harvested on glass fibre mats (Skatron, Belgium) and counted in liquid scintillation counter (Beckman, USA). All measurements were conducted in triplicates and the results were expressed as the stimulation index (SI), which represented the mean cpm (counts per minute) in the presence of mitogen divided by mean cpm in the absence of the mitogen.

Semi-quantitative estimation of gene expression by RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from EDTA blood using the QIAmp RNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). RNA was converted into cDNA using Revert Aid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (MBI Fermentas, Lithuania). The first strand cDNA was used in PCR reaction for the relative expression normalized with expression levels of the house keeping gene GAPDH. The primers for CxCR4 Total (CxCR4-T), CxCR4 splice variant 2 (NM_001008540.1), Rac-1 (NM_006908.4), NF-κB (NM_003998.3) were as follows: GAPDH forward, 5´-CAAGGTCATCCATGACAACTTTG- 3´ and reverse, 5´-GTCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAG- 3´; CxCR4-T forward, 5´- CTTCTACCCCAATGACTTGTGG- 3´ and reverse, 5´- AATGTAGTAAGGCAGCCAACAG-3´; CxCR4 splice variant-2 forward,5´-AACCAGCGGTTACCATGGAG-3´ and reverse, 5´-CCCACAATGCCAGTTAAGAAGA-3´; Rac-1 forward, 5´-TTACGCCCCCTATCCTATCCGCA-3´ and reverse, 5´-GCGCCGAGCACTCCAGGTATT- 3´; NF-κB forward, 5´-TTCACCAAGCCTGCCCTTGGAC- 3´ and reverse, 5´-CTGTCTTGTGGACAACGCAGTGGAATTTTAGG- 3´. The thermal cycle reprogramming was as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35cycles at 95°C for 30 sec and annealing at 58°C for GAPDH, 64°C for CxCR4-T, 56°C for CxCR4 splice variant-2, 66°C for Rac-1 and 62°C for NF-κB for 30seconds, extension was carried at 72°C for 1 min.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SE and ranges. Difference between groups was tested by one-way student’s t-test. Correlation analysis was done using the non-parametric Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient. Linear Regression Analysis was carried out and the residuals were calculated. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.


Demographic and Immunological characteristics

The cross-sectional study included a total of 67 subjects: 27 HIV-1 patients (age range between 21-53 years and CD4+ T-cell count range: 32-854 cells/μl), 12 active PTB patients (age range between 21-65 years and CD4+ T-cell count range: 326-1368 cells/μl), 8 HIV-PTB coinfected patients (age range between 17-34 years and CD4+ T-cell count range: 30-273 cells/μl), and 20 HC (age range between 22-40 years and CD4+ T-cell count range: 444-1375 cells/μl). Table 1 summarizes their clinical characteristics.

Patient groups HC PTB HIV-1 subtype C HIV-PTB
Patient subgroups     Total HIV Above 500 cells/μl 500>X>250 cells/μl Below 250 cells/μl  
Subjects 20 12 27 8 10 9 8
Age [Median years] 28.5 34 32 27 30 37 30
%Males 60 100 59.3 62.5 60 55.6 75
%Females 40   40.7 37.5 40 44.4 25
WBC count 7300 10900 6300 6800 6250 5800 6800
T-cell count [CD3+] 1401 970.5 1738 2403 1811 1475 1095
Th cells count [CD3+CD4+] 849 459.5 345.0 706 348 172 171
Lymphocytes [CD45+] 1954 1579 2377 3477 2424 1587 1888
Hb g/dl 13.8 12.5 13.30 14.2 14.45 10.2 10

Table 1: Demographic and immunological characteristic of individuals within studied subgroups. Data expressed as median.There was no significant difference between CD4 count from HIV-1 subjects with CD4 count >250 cells/μl and HIV-1/PTB co-infected individuals. Strangely, we found significantly low mean CD4 count in individuals with active PTB [HIV-1/2 negative] when compared to HC.

High CD4+FoxP3 frequency correlates with poor T-cell stimulation in HIV-PTB co-infected and HIV advanced disease individuals

Within the HIV-1 infected group, there was significantly low frequency of Treg in individuals with CD4 count >500 cells/μl (mean ± SEM: 3.49 ± 0.31, p=0.0003) as compared to other groups and HC (Figure 2a) hence, indicating early selective depletion of Treg cells. This is followed by increase in the mean percent frequency of Treg as the disease progresses. Though statistically non-significant, we did see an increase in the Treg frequency in HIV-1 patients with Mtb coinfection when compared with only HIV-infected individuals with similar CD4 count (<250 cells/μl). Overall, there was a significant inverse relationship (p<0.0001) between percent Treg as well as FoxP3 expression with the disease progression in terms of CD4 count (Figure 2b). Following PHA stimulation, mean proliferative index of T-cells from HIV-PTB co-infected individuals was significantly lower (mean ± SEM: 39.90 ± 10.00, p=0.0011) as compared to HC (mean ± SEM: 204.7 ± 30.76). Individuals with only PTB or HIV infected with CD4 count >500 cells/μl had higher proliferative index (mean ± SEM: 434.0 ± 138.8, p=0.0390 and 332.9 ± 97.74, p=0.1596 respectively). Overall, there was a significant negative correlation between T-cell proliferation and HIV- 1 disease progression (Figures 2c and 2d). These results suggest that reduced T-cell proliferative potential in HIV-PTB co-infected as well as only HIV infected in advanced stage of disease is due to increased frequency of FoxP3+ Treg cells in these individuals.


Figure 2: Association between increase in percent CD4+ Treg cells with disease progression [drop of CD4 count] and suppressive T-cell proliferation to PHA in HIV-1 individuals. A. Frequency of CD4+Foxp3+ T-regulatory cells in HC, PTB, HIV-1 infected with or without PTB co-infection within CD4 T-cell [Total], CD4+CD25high [CD25 high], CD4+CD25intermediate [CD25 intermediate] and CD4+CD25low/negative [CD25 low/-ve] sub-population. PBMC were stained with CD4-PE, CD25-PE-Cy7, and FoxP3-Alexa488. Data are expressed as Means with SEM [standard error of mean] of percentage cells positive for FoxP3.B.Significant negative correlation between percent CD4+FoxP3+ Tregs and FoxP3 expression per cell [MFI] with CD4 count in PBMC from HIV patients.C. Proliferative T-cell response profile to PHA [non-specific stimulation for 96 hours]. Stimulation indices were determined by comparison with paired unstimulated cells from each individual. Data are expressed as Means with SEM [standard error of the mean] of stimulation indices. D. Negative positive correlation between percent Treg within CD4 T-cells. The solid line is the linear regression of the points and dotted lines are the 95% confidence band for the mean. Rho and p values are Spearman rank correlation test.

HIV-1 subjects in early stage of disease had significantly higher number of CD4+CD25highTreg cells expressing CCR5

CD4 T-cell sub-populations were examined for surface expression of CCR5, which were calculated as percentage of total analyzed CD4 T-cells in peripheral blood. All HIV-1 infected individuals, irrespective of Mtbco-infection, had significantly higher percentage of CD4 T-cells expressing CCR5 as compared to HC. This difference was not seen in individuals with PTB infection (Table 2). However, looking at the CD4+CD25highTreg population within the CD4 T-cells, there was significantly higher percentage of cells with CCR5 expression in PTB individuals (mean ± SEM: 19.83 ± 2.52, p=0.0226) in comparison to HC (mean ± SEM: 12.72 ± 1.29) (Figure 3a). Similar results were seen in early stage of disease in only HIV-1 infected individuals having normal CD4 count (mean ± SEM: 32.17 ± 7.15, p=0.0021). Interestingly, there was a drop in the CCR5+ Treg cell numbers with decrease in CD4 count. There was significantly lower frequency of these cells in HIV patients with CD4 count <250 cells/μl (p=0.002) in comparison to those with CD4 count >500 cells/μl. In individuals with PTB co-infection, there was a significant increase in CCR5+ Treg number (mean ± SEM: 28.15 ± 9.41) when compared with only HIV-1 infected individuals with similar CD4 count (CD4 count <250 (p=0.0260)). There was however no significant change in CCR5 expression seen is CD4CD25low/negative subpopulation among these groups (Figure 3a). This indicates that in the early stage of HIV infection there is higher number of Treg cells having very high CD25 expression co-expressing CCR5 also which may be the reason for their early depletion in these individuals.

Groups Mean Std. Error P value
HC 2.731 0.2586  
PTB 3.295 0.8588 0.3215
HIV-1 [CD4 >500 cells/μl 3.876 0.4110 0.0243
HIV-1 [CD4 500>x>250 cells/μl 5.254 1.208 0.0194
HIV-1 [CD4 <250] 5.835 1.569 0.0127
HIV-PTB 9.424 4.000 0.0243

Table 2: Comparison of frequency of CCR5 expression on CD4+ T-cells in individuals between healthy controls and other diseased patient groups. Data are expressed as Means with SEM [standard error of the mean] of percentage CD4 T-cells positive for CCR5 and P value less than 0.05 indicates significant difference when compared with healthy controls.


Figure 3: Comparison of CCR5 co-receptor expression on CD4 T-cell in HIV infected and the effect of PTB co-infection. A. Comparison of frequency of CCR5 positive CD4 T-cell, CD4+CD25high [Treg], CD4+CD25intermediate and CD4+CD25low/negative sub-population in HC, patients with PTB, HIV-1 infected with or without PTB co-infection. Data are expressed as Means with SEM [standard error of the mean] of percentage cells positive for CCR5. B. Comparison of CCR5 expression per cell on CD4 T-cell, CD4+CD25high [Treg], CD4+CD25intermediate and CD4+CD25low/negative sub-population. PBMC were stained with CD4-FITC, CD25-PE-Cy7, and CCR5-PE. Data are expressed as Means with SEM [standard error of the mean] of MFI of cells positive for CCR5.

M.tuberculosis co-infection in HIV-1 induces CCR5 expression in CD25high and CD25intermediateTreg subpopulations but not in CD25low/negative cells

Looking at the quantitative (MFI) expression of CCR5 on CD4 T-cell subsets, we observed significantly lower expression in HIV infected individuals in advanced stage of disease (CD4 count <250 cells/μl (mean ± SEM: 13.63 ± 1.79, p=0.0496)) as compared to healthy controls (mean ± SEM: 17.84 ± 1.68), while it was significantly in PTB subjects (mean ± SEM: 26.52±3.93, p=0.0214) (Figure 3b). Presence of PTB co-infection had similar effect in HIV-1 individuals with significantly higher expression of CCR5 (mean ± SEM: 21.48±3.54, p=0.0364)as compared to only HIV infected patients with similar CD4 count (i.e.<250 cells/μl: mean ± SEM: 13.63±1.79). This quantitative increase in the CCR5 expression on CD4 T-cell in PTB individuals was seen on CD4+CD25high and CD4+CD25intermediate cell populations but not on CD4+CD25low/negative (mean ± SEM: 24.44±4.28, p=0.0549) subpopulation indicating the presence of Mtb influences the expression of CCR5 on CD25+ Treg cells only and not the CD25lo/- effector cells.

Significant decrease in the frequency of CxCR4+ cells in CD4+CD25low/negative sub-population of HIV-PTB co-infected individuals

There was no significant difference seen in frequency of CxCR4+ cells within HIV-1 sub-groups with the disease progression. However, we found a decrease in the percentage of CxCR4+ cells in HIV-PTB coinfected individuals (mean ± SE: 86.43 ± 4.95) when compared with only PTB infected (mean ± SE: 94.99 ± 1.76, p=0.0232) and HC (mean ± SE: 95.28 ± 1.13, p=0.048) (Figure 4a). Interestingly, this difference was not seen either in Treg population or in CD25intermediate sub-populations but only in the CD25low/negative populations. Further, CD25high Treg cells showed lower frequency of CxCR4+ cells in comparison to CD25low/ negative in all studied subjects. These results indicate that significantly lower number of CD25lo/- effector cells expressing CxCR4 receptor were seen in PTB co-infected individuals as compared to only HIV- 1 infected individuals having similar CD4 count. On the other hand, quantitatively theCXCR4 expression (MFI) was significantly increased on CD4 cells in subjects with only PTB infection (mean ± SEM: 148.4 ± 20.40) as compared to the HC (mean ± SEM: 73.1 ± 6.90, p=0.0011). The expression was also higher in PTB-HIV co-infected subjects (although statistically non-significant at mean ± SEM: 94.77 ± 16.05), when compared to only HIV-1 infected individuals with comparable CD4 count (count <250 cells/μl; mean ± SEM: 105.3 ± 16.16), but was significantly higher than HC (mean ± SEM: 73.10 ± 6.90, p=0.0342). Interestingly, this significant difference in CxCR4 expression in PTB subjects was mainly contributed by CD25low/negative subpopulation showing nearly two fold increase in its expression in comparison to HC (p=0.0011).These results indicate that Mtb infection favors increase in CxCR4 expression on CD25low/negative effector cell subset.


Figure 4: Comparison of CXCR4 co-receptor expression on CD4 T-cell in HIV infected and the effect of PTB co-infection. A. Frequency of CXCR4+ cells within CD4 T-cell, CD4+CD25high, CD4+CD25intermediate and CD4+CD25low/ negative sub-population in HC, patients with PTB, HIV-1 infected with or without PTB co-infection. Data are expressed as Means with SEM [standard error of the mean] of percentage cells positive for CXCR4. B. Comparison of CXCR4 expression per cell on CD4 T-cell, CD4+CD25high [Treg], CD4+CD25intermediate and CD4+CD25low/negative sub-population. PBMC were stained with CD4-FITC, CD25-PE-Cy7, and CXCR4-PE. Data are expressed as Means with SEM [standard error of the mean] of MFI of cells positive for CXCR4.

Upregulation of CxCR4 and its splice variant-2 expression is associated with HIV disease progression and presence of Mtbco-infection

There was a trend of increase in the CxCR4 expression in HIV- 1 patients with the disease progression (Figure 5a, 5c, 5d). Further with the onset of AIDS the HIV-PTB co-infected individuals had higher CxCR4 expression (mean ± SEM: 126.0 ± 6.2, p=0.1201) in comparison to HIV-1 subjects with similar CD4 count (CD4 count <250 cells/μl) though statistically non-significant. Similar results were observed in CxCR4 variant-2 expression with significantly high expression in PTB and HIV-1 patients (Figure 5b). Interestingly, there was significant decrease in the expression of variant-2 with PTB coinfection (mean ± SEM: 124.4.6 ± 7.2) when compared to only HIV-1 infected subjects with CD4 count <250 cells/μl (mean ± SEM: 103.6 ± 5.0, p<0.0175). This suggests that with the progression of HIV disease CXCR4 expression is increased both in only HIV infected as well as PTB co-infected individuals. Further, this increase in CxCR4expression positively correlated with NF-κB expression in HIV-1 subjects (Figure 5e and 5f). This significant positive correlation of CxCR4 was extended with hemeoxygenase 1 (HO-1) but only with variant 2 (Figure 5g and 5h).


Figure 5: CXCR4 expression. A. & B. Total CXCR4 and CXCR4 splice variant 2 mRNA relative gene expressions as percent of GAPDH in unstimulated PBMCs from HC, patients with PTB, HIV-1 infected with or without PTB coinfection. C. & D. CXCR4 mRNA relative gene expression is up-regulated in HIV-1 infected subjects with disease progression with significant negative correlation with absolute CD4 count. E. & F. NF-κB positively associated with CXCR4 variants expression in HIV-1 patients. The relative NF-κB mRNA expression in PBMC cells positively correlated with CXCR4 expression in HIV- 1 subjects and not in healthy controls [HC]. G. & H. Relative HO-1 mRNA expression in PBMCs positively correlate with CXCR4 variant 2 in HIV-1 subjects and not in healthy controls. The solid line is the linear regression of the points and dotted lines are the 95% confidence band for the mean. Rho and p values are Spearman rank correlation test.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection results in down regulation of Rac-1 expression in HIV-1 patients

Rac1 expression was significantly lower in PTB patients (mean ± SEM: 112.4 ± 4.7, p=0.0063), HIV-1 subjects with CD4 count >500 cells/μl (mean ± SEM: 109.7 ± 9.5, p=0.0283) and HIV-PTB co-infected individuals (mean ± SEM: 110.1 ± 2.3, p=0.0062) when compared to healthy controls (mean ± SEM: 131.7 ± 4.5). We saw a trend of initial decrease in Rac1 expression in early stage of HIV-1 infection followed by returning to normal expression as the disease progresses (Figure 6a). Further, there was a significant decrease in the Rac1 expression in HIV individuals with onset of Mtb co-infection when compared with individuals infected with HIV-1 only with CD4 count between 250 and 500 cells/μl (p=0.0128) and <250 cells/μl (p=0.0325). This indicates that onset of Mtb infection down regulates the expression of Rac-1 gene making it unavailable to maintain the CXCR4 conformation suitable for HIV utilization. In addition, Rac1 significantly, positively correlates with immunosuppressive genes FoxP3 (Figure 6f and 6g) and HO-1 (Figure 6h and 6i) in HIV-1 individuals only (unpublished private data).


Figure 6: Rac-1 expression. A.Rac-1 mRNA relative gene expression as percent of GAPDH in unstimulated PBMCs from HC, patients with PTB, HIV-1 infected with or without PTB co-infection. B. & C. Rac-1 positively correlated with relative mRNA expression of CXCR4-T, though this scenario is broken in HIV-1 subjects. D. & E. Significant positive correlation of Rac1 expression with NF-κB, in both healthy and HIV-1 subjects, independent of the disease condition.F. & G.There was significant positive correlation between Rac1 with HO-1 in HIV-1 subjects.H. & I.There was no correlation of FoxP3 with Rac1 in healthy controls but we found significant correlation in HIV-1 subjects.The solid line is the linear regression of the points and dotted lines are the 95% confidence band for the mean. Rho and p values are Spearman rank correlation test.


The results in the present study elucidate some of the cellular factors manipulated by HIV-1 at different stages of disease progression and in the event of M. tuberculosis co-infection. It has earlier been revealed that CCR5 and CxCR4, the major co-receptors critical for viral entry into the host cells, are differentially expressed on CD4+ T-cells, and their relative expression is closely associated with disease pathogenesis [18-24]. We studied their expression on different subsets of T-cells including T-regulatory cells and evaluated their role in changing the frequency of these cells with disease progression. We also evaluated the change in Rac1 expression, critical for functional CxCR4 receptor [10], for it’s possible role in M5 to T4 HIV-1 viral shift based on availability of co-receptor.

We found a significantly low frequency of FoxP3+CD4 cells in early stage of disease followed by a gradual increase with the progression of disease. These observations prompted us to look at the expression of CCR5 and CxCR4 on Treg cell sub population for their possible role in influencing the change in Treg cell frequency with HIV disease progression. Frequency of CD4 T cells expressing CCR5 was found to be up-regulated in HIV-1 infected individuals when compared to the healthy controls, irrespective of the stage of the disease, which is in concordance with the previous findings [25-27]. There was higher percentage of CD25highTreg cells expressing CCR5 in comparison to CD25low/negative effector cells (p<0.0001) and which could make them preferential targets for R5 viral attack in the initial stages of disease (Figure 3a). On the other hand, in advanced stage of the disease with CD4 count <250 cells/μl, the number of CCR5 positive Treg were significantly lower when compared to HIV-1 individuals in early stage of disease (p=0.0022). With previous reports in non-subtype C infections, the depletion of CCR5 expressing memory cells in acute infection may drive viral evolution towards CxCR4 [28,29], and recent reports showing about 30% of CxCR4-utilising viruses in untreated and treated HIV-1 subtype C infected adults from South Africa, Malawi, and Zimbabwe, suggesting a shift in viral properties [30-32].This change in CCR5 expression might be responsible for increase in the frequency of Treg cells in the advanced stages of the disease.

On the contrary we observed a lower frequency of CD4 T-cells expressing chemokine receptor CxCR4, in the later stages of HIV disease when compared to healthy controls, although statistically nonsignificant (Figure 4a). This is in concordance with previously reported observation in HIV subjects [25-27]. It is interesting to note that there is a reverse scenario when we considered the quantitative expression of CxCR4 per cell (MFI) on CD4 cells in these subjects (Figure 4b). There was an increase in the CxCR4 expression in advanced stages of HIV- 1 when compared to asymptomatic early stage HIV-1 subjects. This could explain decrease in the frequency of CxCR4 positive CD4 T-cells in later stages of the disease due to X4 tropic viral shift and killing of these cells. Again, contrary to CCR5, there was significant decrease in percent CD4 T-cells expressing CxCR4 (p=0.0033) even quantitatively (MFI, p=0.0004) in CD25highTreg when compared with CD25low/negative cells in healthy controls. This could be a possible explanation for the decrease in percent of CxCR4 expressingCD4 T-cells in CD25low/negative subpopulation of cells within HIV-1 groups negatively correlating with disease progression but with no effect on Treg cell number with low expression of CxCR4.

However the situation was totally different if we look at the data from patients infected with only Mtb or co-infected with HIV. It is well known that Mtb co-infection in HIV may create a microenvironment enhancing the productive infection of T-cells by HIV [33-36]. We observed that HIV-1 individuals with active pulmonary tuberculosis displaying increased CCR5 (p= 0.0364, Figure 3b) and not CxCR4 (p=0.1914, Figure 4b) expression per cell (MFI) on CD4 T-cells when compared with HIV-1 subjects with similar CD4 count (<250 cells/ μl) suggesting preferential utilization of CCR5 rather than CXCR4 by virus in co-infected individuals. This falls in line with reports which demonstrated that R5 viral variants were preferentially recovered from patients with active TB [37]. Furthermore, increased frequency of CD4 cells expressing CCR5 and up-regulated expression limited to CD25high and CD25intermediate populations only in co-infected individuals with no significant change in CD25low/negative subpopulation indicated the influence of MTB on these two subpopulations only making them more vulnerable to HIV-1 infection. Whereas, a significant decrease in frequency of CxCR4+ T-cells in co-infected individuals could mainly be attributed to a significant decrease in CD25low/negative CD4 T-cell subpopulation. On the other hand, significantly increased CxCR4 expression on CD25low/negative cells during Mtb infection makes it the main population affected in co-infected individuals as evidenced by their low frequency in these individuals. Thus, the data suggests that M. tuberculosis co-infection in HIV-1 individuals seems to be selectively affecting the differential expression of these chemokine receptors on different subpopulations of cells thereby leading to their selective depletion during different stages of disease.

Over the course of infection, the co-receptor usage of HIV changes from CCR5 to CxCR4 in 50% of the infected individuals [1,7,38-41]. It is generally believed that relatively late appearance of X4 virus variants is driven by evolution of virus population during the course of disease [42]. This assumption is in conflict with viral property of rapid turnover of about 1010 to 1012 virons every two days combined with the high mutation rate of HIV [42-50]. This should result in emergence of X4 variants fairly early during infection, especially because, in some cases, only two mutations are thought to be necessary for co-receptor switch. Hence factors that influence this evolution of the virus remain largely unknown. It has been demonstrated recently that Rac1 is specifically involved in regulating the conformation of CxCR4, thereby controlling signaling efficiency of the receptor. Furthermore, the conformation adopted by CxCR4 after Rac1 inhibition blocks HIV-1 infection, most probably by interfering with virus binding and subsequent entry into the host cells [10]. It was interesting to note in our study that Rac1 expression was significantly lower in patients in early stage of disease when compared to healthy controls (Figure 6a). With the disease progression we observed an increase in its expression in individuals infected with only HIV-1. These results indicate and support the other previous findings that initially there is R5 virus predominance as there is low Rac1 expression and X4 viruses even present are unable to use CxCR4 co-receptor. Rac1 has no effect on CCR5 conformation or its utilization by the virus [10]. Though, in advanced stage of HIV-1 infection we found an up-regulated Rac1 expression which would make CxCR4 conformationally favorable to HIV-1 attachment and possibly is one of the reasons for R5 to X4 viral shift with HIV disease progression. We found a significant positive correlation of Rac1 with NF-κB (Figure 6d) and CxCR4 (Figure 6b) expression in healthy controls. Though this correlation of Rac1 and CxCR4 was not obvious in HIV-1 patients (Figure 6c), NF-κB retained significant positive correlation in HIV- 1 subjects indicating this pathway not being affected by the disease condition (Figure 6e). However, with M. tuberculosis co-infection, the Rac1 was significantly down-regulated making available CxCR4 receptors non-utilizable by the virus. This observation is in line with the finding that R5 viral variants were preferentially recovered from HIV infected patients with active M. tuberculosis [51].

Overall, we have recognized novel inter-relationships of genes and their behavior in HIV-1 therapy naïve individuals, highlighting how the virus manipulates the host machinery during Mtb co-infection to its advantage. Though, significant correlation of NF-κB with Rac1 in both healthy and HIV-1 subjects was observed, a highly significant correlation between FoxP3, HO-1 and Rac-1 (unpublished personal data) was seen in HIV-1 subjects with CxCR4 variant 2 showing positive correlation with HO-1, these findings need further attention to look at their clinical implication and disease outcome.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 11601
  • [From(publication date):
    April-2013 - Aug 24, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 7836
  • PDF downloads :3765

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version