alexa Effect of Feeding Enriched Formulated Diet and Live Feed on Growth, Survival and Fatty Acid Profile of Deccan Mahseer, Tor Khudree (Sykes) First Feeding Fry
ISSN: 2155-9546
Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development

Like us on:

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Effect of Feeding Enriched Formulated Diet and Live Feed on Growth, Survival and Fatty Acid Profile of Deccan Mahseer, Tor Khudree (Sykes) First Feeding Fry

Soibam Khogen Singh1*, Upasana Mishra1, Sibnarayan Dam Roy1, Chadha NK1 and Venkateshwarlu G2

1Aquaculture Division, Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai - 400061, India

2Fish Processing Technology Division, Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai–400061, India

*Corresponding Author:
Soibam Khogen Singh
Aquaculture Division
Central Institute of Fisheries Education
Mumbai-400061, India
Tel: +918730854370
Fax: +913812865291
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: June 17, 2012; Accepted Date: July 24, 2012; Published Date: July 30, 2012

Citation: Singh SK, Mishra U, Roy SD, Chadha NK, Venkateshwarlu G (2012) Effect of Feeding Enriched Formulated Diet and Live Feed on Growth, Survival and Fatty Acid Profile of Deccan Mahseer, Tor Khudree (Sykes) First Feeding Fry. J Aquacult Res Dev 3:143 doi:10.4172/2155-9546.1000143

Copyright: © 2012 Singh SK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development


Deccan mahseer (Tor khudree) has recently been included in the IUCN list of threatened species due to its declining population. Intervention of nutritional strategies for better growth and survival of early stages for grow out and ranching is essential. The present investigation intended to study the effect of various dietary combinations containing live and inert feed enriched with cod liver oil on growth and survival of Tor khudree first feeding fry, while effects on whole body fatty acid composition of fry were also studied. Cod liver oil as a source of essential fatty acids was used for enriching both live and inert formulated feed. The experimental design consist of four treatments viz. T0 (inert diet without enrichment), T1 (inert diet enriched with cod liver oil), T2 (inert diet enriched with cod liver oil+unenriched Artemia) and T3 (unenriched inert diet+enriched Artemia) fed to four distinct experimental groups for a period of 60 days. At the end of the experiment growth, survival and fatty acid profile of the fry were examined. Fry fed combination of unenriched inert diet and enriched Artemia (T3) had the highest growth and feed efficiency in terms of percentage weight gain (PWG), specific growth rate (SGR), average daily growth (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Survival percentage was also significant in T3 compared to other groups. Enrichment of dietary components had a direct effect on the whole body fatty acid profile of mahseer fry with significant (P<0.05) changes in the eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA 20:5 n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA 22:6 n-3) composition. This study provides avenues for improving the growth and survival of mahseer fry through enrichment and concurrent co-feeding strategies with dietary formulated diet which can further reduce feed cost during fry rearing.


Tor khudree; Enrichment; Co-feeding; EPA; DHA; First feeding fry; Cod liver oil; Enrichment


IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature); PWG (Percentage weight gain); SGR (Specific Growth Rate); ADG (Average Daily Growth); FCR (Feed Conversion Ratio); EPA (Eicosapentaenoic Acid); DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid)


Mahseers are considered as potential candidate species for aquaculture, especially in the wake of the recent push toward the culture of indigenous species. Deccan Mahseer (Tor khudree) is one of the important coldwater fish species having market demand as a food fish and for recreational fisheries in India [1]. Recently the fish is paid special attention due to its rapid disappearance from natural environment and also ecological alterations and physical changes in natural environment [2]. The latest version of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species has listed Tor khudree for the first time in the year 2007 as endangered because of a 60-70% decline in the native wild population during the past three generations (20 years), as a result of exploitation and habitat degradation. Commercial expansion of this species for aquaculture and stock enhancement in the natural waters requires special attention. The main bottleneck in the process is the limitation of optimum sized fingerlings for grow out or ranching into the natural waters. For promotion of mahseer, one alternative could be the development of suitable breeding and rearing technology which requires knowledge of their nutritional requirement from hatchlings to adult stage. Weaning success from live food to formulated feed remains a very critical period in which there is a gradual change from live prey to formulated [3]. Use of live food (Artemia metanauplii) during early developmental stages of T. khudree is expensive; therefore weaning in co-feeding with Artemia nauplii provides alternative weaning strategy for ensuring lower feed cost [4]. An overlapping co-feeding period during which live food is gradually replaced by increasing quantities of formulated feed has been shown to improve growth and survival of fish larvae compared to the use of live food only [5]. Moreover, formulated diets can balance the nutritional composition of live food especially with respect to amino acids which are not easy to modify in live food [6]. Live food may influence ingestion, digestion and assimilation of formulated diets [7] and also influences digestion by stimulating endocrine responses [8].

Essential fatty acids are unsaturated fatty acids that must be provided preformed in the diet [9]. The active forms in n-3 family are eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA 20:5 n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA 22:6 n-3). In general, warm water fishes require polyunsaturated n-6 fatty acids or a mixture of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids, while cold water species require n-3 forms [10]. Coldwater fishes have a higher requirement for n-3 PUFAs, whereas warm water fishes tend to have a greater requirement for n-6 fatty acids [11]. This is because; n-3 structure permits a greater degree of unsaturation, which is necessary in the membrane phospholipids to maintain flexibility and permeability characteristics at low temperatures [12]. During fry rearing, live feed are the main food during live prey feeding. However, it is very difficult to reach optimal enrichment levels as ingested EPA/DHA is catabolised and used as an energy source by Artemia [9,13,14]. Therefore, the supplementation of formulated diets could be a solution to satisfy the nutritional requirements. During such transitional period, enriched live food is partially replaced by artificial diets until the fry can be fed solely on formulated diets. Early co-feeding is beneficial, since it reduces the use of live food, which are cumbersome to produce and difficult to manipulate nutritionally [15]. In addition, co-feeding is expected to improve the nutritional condition of the larvae and might facilitate earlier transition into dry feeds; only [16] of early co-feeding has been widely documented in various species such as tongue sole, Cynoglosssus semilaevis [17], barramundi, L. calcarifer [18], turbot, Scophthalmus maximus [19], and winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus [20].

While knowledge of the exact nutrient requirements of T. khudree is limited, lipids and essential fatty acids are generally recognised to play critical roles in larval development. Recent advances have led to the possible replacement of live feed organisms with micro diets from first feeding in Haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus [21]. Artemia metanauplii as starter diet may be too small and might not contain enough nutrients for the larval development. It has been established that high levels of (n-3) HUFA in the live feed can improve growth and survival of fish larvae in a number of species. Starting an early cofeeding with appropriate enriched diets, formulated diets or Artemia biomass can be a solution to improve and balance the larval nutrition and to shorten the live prey feeding period. Meanwhile, the appropriate nutritional composition, especially fatty acid contents of the formulated diets for co-feeding will be crucial for development of mahseer fry. The present work was intended to compare the effect of different dietary formulation combining both live feed and inert diet after enrichment using EPA/DHA sources on growth, survival and fatty acid profile of T. khudree first feeding fry.

Materials and Methods

Maintenance of experimental fishes

First feeding fry of T. khudree (Average weight: 0.10 ± 0.12 g) were procured from Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPCL), Lonavla, Maharashtra, India during October month and maintained at the rearing unit of Aquaculture Division, Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, India. Fry were maintained with optimum conditions for another 20 days and fed on live feed. Round the clock aeration was provided to maintain an optimum dissolved oxygen. The entire tank bottom was siphoned clean every third day. The water quality parameters were checked once in three days and were found within the optimum range (dissolved oxygen: 7.0-7.2 mg L-1; pH: 7.5- 7.8; temperature: 20.4-24.8°C; ammonia nitrogen: 0.14-0.23 mg L-1; nitrite nitrogen: 0.001-0.005 mg L-1; nitrate nitrogen: 0.02-0.07 mg L-1) throughout the experimental period as observed earlier by Sangma and Basavaraj [22].

Experimental design and trial

The experimental design consist of four treatments viz. T0 (inert diet without enrichment), T1 (inert diet enriched with cod liver oil), T2 (inert diet enriched with cod liver oil+unenriched Artemia) and T3 (unenriched inert diet+ enriched Artemia) with three replicates each following a completely randomized design (CRD). The experimental trial was conducted for a period of 60 days at the Aquaculture facility of the Institute. Plastic tubs of 70 L capacity covered with perforated lids were used for the trial. The tubs were filled with 50 L of chlorine free water and round the clock aeration was provided in all tanks. A total of 240 uniformly sized fry having an average weight of 0.40 g (20 fry×4 treatments×3 replicates) were uniformly distributed into the experimental groups and acclimatised for two days prior to the start of the experiment. Each diet (inert diet and live feed) was fed twice daily (09:00 and 17:00 hour) to triplicate group of T. khudree fry at 5% of the body weight. Siphoning of the uneaten feed was carried out daily.

Hatching and separation of Artemia nauplii

Artemia cyst used in the study was supplied from Supreme Plus ™, Ogden, USA. Hatching of Artemia cysts were carried out as suggested by Sorgeloos et al. [23]. Prior to hatching, cysts were washed in active bleach liquor for six minutes followed by rinsing in chlorine free water. The cysts were incubated in a glass jar at density of 0.3 g 500 mL-1 for 24 h using saline water (25 ppt). Temperature of water during hatching of Artemia nauplii was maintained at 26°C and vigorous aeration was provided throughout the hatching period for efficient hatching of Artemia cyst into nauplii. After hatching, the nauplii were separated from the cyst using a rubber tube and a piece of blotting cloth and were washed for five minutes in clean chlorine free running water. The nauplii were then transferred to fresh saline water (12 ppt).

Enrichment of Artemia nauplii

The hatched nauplii were collected together in a tank containing saline water (12 ppt) and the enrichment emulsion was added at the rate of 0.5 mL L-1 of the Artemia nauplii containing water with a density of 100-150 nauplii ml-1. The enrichment was conducted for 12 h. The Artemia nauplii containing water was provided with vigorous aeration to ensure thorough mixing. The composition of the emulsion used for enriching the Artemia is given in Table 1.

Ingredients Composition
Water 100 ml
Cod liver oil 20 ml
Egg yolk 11 ml
Gelatine 3.7 g
Vitamin E 40 mg

Table 1: Composition of emulsion used for enrichment.

Formulation of inert diet

A purified inert diet containing 45% protein was formulated using ingredients obtained from Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India. Composition of diet and their proximate analysis are presented in Table 2. The required amount of the ingredients were weighed and mixed properly. Cod liver oil as a source of EPA/DHA was added gradually to assure the homogeneity of the ingredients. The mixed ingredients were passed through a single screw pelletizer with 1 mm dia.

  Enriched Diet Unenriched Diet
*Casein 37.78 37.78
*Gelatin 10.00 10.00
¶Cod liver oil 5.00 -
¶Sunflower oil - 5.00
Vitamin1 2.00 2.00
Mineral2 4.00 4.00
*Carboxy Methyl Cellulose 1.00 1.00
*Dextrin 25.22 25.22
*α-cellulose 10.00 10.00
Proximate composition
Dry matter 93.94  ±  0.87 92.97  ±  0.13
Crude protein 45.92  ±  0.27 45.06  ±  0.35
Lipid 9.96  ±  0.05 9.47  ±  0.08
Ash 4.60  ±  0.01 4.68  ±  0.02
Crude fibre 8.21  ±  0.08 8.12  ±  0.03

Table 2: Formulation of experimental inert diet (g/100 g) for T. khudree fry and proximate composition (% dry weight).

Growth and survival

Fry in each tub were bulk weighed every week to monitor the growth rates. The growth performance of the fingerlings was evaluated in terms of percentage weight gain, specific growth rate (SGR), feed efficiency ratio (FER), feed conversion ratio (FCR), feed conversion efficiency (FCE), average daily growth (ADG) based on the following standard formulae:

Weight gain % = (final weight–initial weight)/(initial weight)x100

SGR = 100 (ln average final weight−ln average initial weight)/ number of culture days

FCR = total dry feed intake (g)/live weight gain (g)

ADG = (mean final weight– mean initial weight)/days of culture

Survival (%) = (total number of animals harvested/total number of animals stocked)x100

Biochemical analysis

The biochemical compositions of formulated diet, emulsion, Artemia nauplii and T. khudree fry were measured using standard methods [23] for moisture, ash, crude protein, lipid and crude fibre.

Fatty acid analysis

Total lipid was extracted using Folch method [24] with some modification from the enriched and unenriched Artemia nauplii, formulated feed and the larval tissue. The AOAC [25] method was followed to esterify the lipid extract. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) was prepared from the extracted lipids by heating with methanolic NaOH and then with BF3 Methanol for esterification. N-heptane (5 mL) was added to recover the methyl esters in organic phase. Saturated NaCl solution was added to the mixture and the aqueous and organic layers were separated using a separating funnel. The upper N- heptane phase was pipetted out and stored in 10 mL glass vials in refrigerator until further analysis. Gas chromatography-Mass spectrometry (GCMS) measurements were performed using a Shimadzu QP2010 quadrupole Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometer equipped with a carbowax (30 m×0.25 mm ID; 0.25 μm film thickness) capillary column (Cromlab S.A). Helium was used as the carrier gas. Injector and detector temperatures were set at 250°C. Injection was performed in split mode (1:15). The column temperature was programmed initially at 50°C for 2 min and then to increase at a rate of 10°C per min to a final temperature of 230°C. FAM esters were separated at constant pressure (23.1 kPa) and peaks were identified by comparing the mass spectra with the mass spectral data base.

Principal component analysis (PCA)

Principal component analysis (PCA) of samples fed with different experimental diets was performed by using Unscrambler (Version 9.5, CAMO, Norway).

Statistical analysis

All the data were analysed using SPSS version 16.0 for windows. One-way analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) was used to compare all the treatments. Significant difference between two means was measured by Duncan’s multiple range test. All the differences were considered significant at P<0.05 and the results are presented as mean ± standard error (SE).


Growth and survival

Effect of dietary treatment on important growth parameters viz. PWG, SGR, ADG and FCR are given in Table 4. Groups fed with enriched Artemia and unenriched inert diet (T3) recorded highest percentage weight gain (297.00 ± 0.42) which was significant (P<0.05) whereas groups fed with unenriched inert diet (T0) exhibited lowest value (137.2 ± 0.20). SGR and ADG was highest in T3 (2.28 ± 0.00; 22.21 ± 0.00) and lowest in T0 (1.45 ± 0.00; 9.55 ± 0.00) which was significant (P<0.05). FCR followed a similar pattern which was significant (P<0.05) among the groups. Rearing of T. khudree fry fed with different diets showed significant variation in survival (Figure 3). Percent survival did not show any variation up to 15 days but was significant (P<0.05) after 15 days of experimental feeding. At the end of the trial, significant variation (P<0.05) in survival was observed with better survival in T3 followed by T2, T1 and T0.

Fatty acids Before enrichment After enrichment
  1Inert diet Artemia 2Inert diet Artemia
12:0 0.70 0.28 0.33 0.20
13:0 ND 0.24 ND 0.07
14:0 3.30 1.78 5.77 5.40
15:0 0.33 0.90 0.54 0.82
16:0 18.4 14.48 19.27 19.13
16:1 n-9 0.03 6.34 4.06 7.48
16:1 n-7 0.63 ND 0.55 0.86
17:0 0.21 1.50 0.34 0.72
18:0 5.26 0.62 3.98 0.27
18:1 n-9 24.70 24.29 31.92 25.00
18:1 n-7 0.13 3.31 3.16 3.75
18:1 n-5 9.73 ND 11.02 0.61
18:2 n-6 0.10 8.90 3.08 8.50
19:0 0.56 ND 0.25 0.16
18:3 n-3 0.66 4.73 3.73 11.74
20:0 ND 0.54 0.11 0.55
20:1 n-9 ND 0.65 0.77 6.04
20:2 n-6 ND 1.01 0.13 1.03
20:3 n-3 ND 0.89 1.36 1.29
20:4 n-6 ND 1.30 0.32 1.40
20:4 n-3 ND 1.40 0.72 1.49
20:5 n-3 0.12 2.45 3.45 4.53
22:1 n-9 0.12 0.53 1.75 1.83
22:6 n-3 0.10 1.30 3.39 4.14

Table 3: Fatty acid profile (area %) of enriched and unenriched Artemia nauplii and inert diet.

Treatments PWG SGR ADG FCR
T0 137.20  ±  0.20a 1.45  ±  0.005a 9.55  ±  0.003a 2.71  ±  0.003a
T1 177.41  ±  0.25b 1.73  ±  0.003b 12.05  ±  0.030b 1.95  ±  0.003b
T2 196.45  ±  0.26c 1.80  ±  0.003c 16.13  ±  0.003c 1.95  ±  0.003c
T3 297.02  ±  0.42d 2.28  ±  0.003d 22.21  ±  0.003d 1.61  ±  0.003d

Table 4: Growth parameters of T. khudree fry fed different experimental diets for 60 days.

Fry whole body biochemical composition

Proximate composition of T. khudree fry after 60 days experimental feeding is presented in Table 5. No significant variation in whole body composition was observed due to different experimental diets (P>0.05) except lipid content which was significantly different among experimental groups (P<0.05). Higher lipid content was observed in T2 and T3 (5.05 ± 0.01 and 6.27 ± 0.01 respectively) which was significant (P<0.05) from other groups. Whole body moisture content varied from 70.63 ± 0.03 to 72.45 ± 0.03 with highest in T1 and lowest in T3. Lowest crude protein was observed in T2 (15.02 ± 0.01) whereas highest in T3 (16.70 ± 0.03). Total carbohydrate was highest in T1 (5.28 ± 0.02) and lowest in T3 (3.38 ± 0.03). T0 exhibited highest ash content and T2 had lowest value.

Treatments Moisture Crude Protein Lipid Ash TC*
T0 72.20  ±  0.01 15.80  ±  0.02 2.78a  ±  0.02 4.60  ±  0.03 4.62  ±  0.01
T1 72.45  ±  0.03 15.50  ±  0.02 4.27b  ±  0.03 3.50  ±  0.03 5.28  ±  0.02
T2 71.76  ±  0.02 15.02  ±  0.01 5.05b  ±  0.01 3.40  ±  0.02 4.77  ±  0.01
T3 70.63  ±  0.03 16.70  ±  0.03 6.27c  ±  0.01 3.02  ±  0.01 3.38  ±  0.03

Table 5: Proximate composition of Tor khudree (% wet weight) fry after 60 days experimental feeding.

Fatty acid profile of Artemia/inert diet after enrichment

The fatty acid profile of the Artemia nauplii and inert diet before and after enrichment is summarized in Table 3. In the inert diet no considerable changes in composition of short chain fatty acids (12:0, 14:0, 15:0, 16:0, 17:0 and 18:0) occurred due to dietary enrichment with cod liver oil. Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) content in inert diet increased slightly. The Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) content of unenriched inert diet was 10.05% whereas that of enriched micro diet was 22.3%. PUFA viz. EPA and DHA showed higher levels in enriched diet. Enrichment process increased the PUFA level in Artemia with EPA and DHA in Artemia nauplii ranging from 8.48% (unenriched Artemia) to 20.41% (enriched Artemia).

Fry whole body fatty acid profile

After 60 days experimental trial, the whole body fatty acid composition of T. khudree fry reflected dietary effect and is given in Table 6. Significant (P<0.05) increase in n-3 PUFA such as EPA (20:3 n-3) and DHA (22:6 n-3) was observed in T1, T2 and T3 compared to control due to higher EPA and DHA content in diet after enrichment. Highest EPA content was observed in T3 followed by T1 and T2. DHA content was highest in T3 followed by T2 and T1.

Fatty  acids Diet 1 (T0) Diet 2 (T1) Diet 3 (T2) Diet 4 (T3)
12:0 0.04 ± 0.00a 0.13 ± 0.01a 0.21 ± 0.03ab 0.36 ± 0.16b
14:0 3.31 ± 0.00a 5.50 ± 0.07c 3.99 ± 0.09b 3.28 ± 0.09a
15:0 0.73 ± 0.01a 0.84 ± 0.08a 0.97 ± 0.21a 0.79 ± 0.13a
16:0 0.73 ± 0.01a 0.84 ± 0.08a 0.97 ± 0.21a 0.79 ± 0.13a
16:1 n-9 6.25 ± 0.14c 3.47 ± 0.08b 1.96 ± 0.05a 2.13 ± 0.14a
16:1 n-7 0.46 ± 0.02a 1.08 ± 0.15b 0.60 ± 0.06a 1.14 ± 0.07b
17:0 1.25 ± 0.14b 0.67 ± 0.63a 0.94 ± 0.16a 0.78 ± 0.05a
18:0 12.25 ± 0.87b 2.86 ± 0.17a 2.63 ± 0.18a 3.20 ± 0.21a
18:1 n-9 16.15 ± 0.03a 31.77 ± 0.15d 29.60 ± 0.13c 28.63 ± 0.36b
18:1 n-7 2.35 ± 0.14a 2.32 ± 0.20a 2.94 ± 0.12b 4.91 ± 0.32c
18:2 n-6 18.02 ± 0.29c 10.39 ± 0.22a 12.69 ± 0.30b 10.53 ± 0.13a
18:3 n-3 4.35 ± 0.14b 3.55 ± 0.26a 4.37 ± 0.08b 6.97 ± 0.14c
19:0 0.14 ± 0.14 ND ND 0.18 ± 0.02
20:0 0.23 ± 0.02a 0.61 ± 0.15b 0.30 ± 0.01a 0.34 ± 0.04a
20:1 n-9 1.70 ± 0.12a 3.72 ± 0.03c 3.96 ± 0.08c 2.34 ± 0.07b
20:2 n-9 0.43 ± 0.01 ND ND ND
20:2 n-6 0.11 ± 0.01a 0.18 ± 0.02b 0.25 ± 0.25b 0.26 ± 0.03c
20:2 n-7 0.12 ± 0.01a 0.68 ± 0.02c 0.47 ± 0.01b 0.39 ± 0.08b
20:3 n-9 0.26 ± 0.01 ND  ND ND
20:3 n-7 0.75 ± 0.09b 0.29 ± 0.03a 0.47 ± 0.07a 0.94 ± 0.05b
20:4 n-6 (AA) 1.24 ± 0.01a 1.31 ± 0.00ab 1.35 ± 0.07ab 1.41 ± 0.00b
20:3 n-3 1.60 ± 0.06d 0.73 ± 0.03b 0.55 ± 0.02a 0.93 ± 0.04c
20:4 n-3 1.31 ± 0.01a 0.56 ± 0.06b 0.47 ± 0.35b 1.20 ± 0.01a
20:5 n-3 (EPA) 4.01 ± 0.00a 4.45 ± 0.20b 4.40 ± 0.01b 6.50 ± 0.05c
22:1 n-9 1.30 ± 0.02b 1.42 ± 0.09bc 1.55 ± 0.07c 0.28 ± 0.04a
22:6 n-3 (DHA) 3.21 ± 0.00a 3.55 ± 0.02b 4.15 ± 0.01c 5.40 ± 0.06d

Table 6: Fatty acid profile of T. khudree fry fed with different experimental diets for a 60 days period.

Principal component analysis (PCA)

Principal component analyses (PCA) of samples with the different fatty acids are plotted in score plot and bi-plot and are presented in Figure 4. Score plot describes change in position of T3 from the initial position whereas T1 and T2 fall on the same area indicating similar effect due to dietary treatments. Bi-plot analysis also reveals shift in position and the shift was found to be due to dietary PUFA viz. 18:3 n-3; 22:6 n-3; 20:5 n-3. T3 (unenriched inert diet+enriched Artemia) showed the best performance with highest level of PUFA.


Although live foods are often good sources of nutrition, for many fish species, these traditional food sources have been found to be inadequate to support nutritional requirement. It has been well established that one of the limiting factors in nutrition of early stages of fishes is the level of n-3 HUFA. Hence certain feeds containing HUFAs (especially DHA, 22:6 n-3 and EPA 20:5 n-3) can be valuable as food sources for enrichment. Also, feed ingestion and digestion do not appear to be regulated by total lipid content, but by the lipid source and fatty acid composition [26].

In the present study, EPA/DHA enriched diet (T1, T2 and T3) exerted significant effect (P<0.05) on percentage weight gain of T. khudree fry compared to unenriched inert diet (T0). Fry co-fed with enriched Artemia and unenriched inert diet promoted highest percentage weight gain, specific growth rate and average daily growth (Figures 1-3). These may be explained by higher percentage of EPA and DHA accumulated in enriched Artemia and growth promoting effect of these fatty acids. Significantly lower growth in fry fed only inert diet (T0 and T1) signifies that mahseer fry at this stage are unable to metabolise the diet and may be due to partially functional digestive system. Moreover, physical aspects such as particle size, distribution and attractiveness of the formulated diets can affect larval ingestion [26]. According to Cahu and Zambonino [27] the enzyme activity pattern is age-dependent, but can be modulated by the inert diet. Live food given together with a formulated diet is reported to enhance the efficiency of the formulated diet by promoting the assimilation and deposition of dietary nutrients in the larval body [7].


Figure 1: Growth of T. khudree fry measured as total length (mm) measured at different sampling times during the experimental trial at 5% significance level.


Figure 2: Growth of T. khudree fry measured as weight (g) measured at different sampling times during the experimental trial at 5% significance level.


Figure 3: Survival rate (%) of T. khudree fry in the different experimental groups at 15 days interval during the 60 days experimental trial at 5% significance level.


Figure 4: Score plot and bi plot showing the difference in the fatty acid profiles of T. khudree fry fed with different experimental diets.

In the present study, low feed intake (data not shown) was observed in groups fed only inert diet which may be due to low palatability of the inert diet as explained by higher FCR. In treatments T2 and T3, better feed consumption when 50% of the live prey are substituted by inert diet provides future avenues for formulating low feed cost for this species. EPA and DHA (HUFA) play a major role growth process during early stages of this fishes. In the present experiment, EPA/DHA levels were comparatively higher in enriched Artemia than present in the inert diets. This result may explain a major beneficial role of live food as an effective carrier vehicle for EPA/DHA during early stages. Fry percent survival was significant after 45th day of experimental trial (Figure 3). Fry fed completely on inert diet exhibited low survival rate compared to fry co-fed with both inert and live feed. This may be due to higher supplementation of dietary lipid in formulated diet which would impact the water quality as seen in our study. Oil films were observed in tanks which would choke the gills of developing fry and increases stressful conditions. Mahseer fry co-fed on inert diet and enriched live feed had the highest survival rate and this could be explained by better assimilation of dietary EPA/DHA through live food enrichment. It has been established that high levels of (n-3) HUFA in the live feed can improve survival of fish larvae in a number of species [28]. The higher survival percentage may be due to the enhancement of ability of fry to withstand stressful environment by feeding on HUFA enriched Artemia nauplii.

The present experiment was also designed to evaluate HUFA retention capacity of cold water fish species, T. khudree fry after experimental feeding with both live feed and inert diet. As the early life stages of fishes have limited capacity to elongate and desaturate 18-carbon PUFA, freshwater species require supplemented PUFA in their diet. In the present study, dietary lipid levels in both inert and live feed exerted significant effect on some class of fatty acid in the fish. Highest EPA level was observed in fry fed combination of enriched Artemia and unenriched diet (T3). This observation suggests that beneficial EPA is transformed more efficiently into tissue when live feed are enriched with EPA rich sources. Fry fed combination of unenriched Artemia and enriched Artemia had less EPA in tissue compared to T3. Dietary DHA levels had similar effect on the tissue fatty acid level with lowest value observed in control (T0) and highest value in T3. From the above results it can be concluded that enrichment process using live feed as vehicle for transport of essential fatty acids serves the purpose of maintaining the fatty acid requirement of the early young stages of T. khudree fry and subsequently higher accumulation in fish would provide avenues for fish products as source of these fatty acids.

Principal components analysis reveals that irrespective of the diet, lipid fractions shows distinct fatty acid patterns. The fish fed with PUFA enriched diet and enriched Artemia for 60 days were different from initial position based on fatty acid composition. PUFA, n-3 PUFA, MUFA, 18:2 n-6, 18:1 n-9 and 22:6 n-3 were found to be responsible for causing the differences among the samples and T3 showed the best performance with high level of PUFA in this experiment. This was supported by Karanth et al. [29] where the PCA shows the differences in the muscle fatty acid profiles of fish fed with different dietary groups enriched with PUFA which were found to be responsible for causing the differences among the samples.


Result from the present study reveals that nutritional quality of Artemia can be improved by enriching with EPA and DHA rich sources such as cod liver oil which is easily available in market. EPA and DHA being essential for early life stages can improve growth and survival as observed in our study. Further, co-feeding early stages of cold water species with enriched live feed in combination with inert diet can further reduce the live feed cost. Thus this study provides an opportunity for growth enhancement and better survival in cold water species, Tor khudree through nutritional manipulation so that optimum sized fingerlings can be produced to make its culture a viable commercial activity and protect the species from extinction in the wild.


The authors are thankful to Dr. W.S. Lakra, Director, Central Institute of Fisheries Education (CIFE), Mumbai and Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India for supporting the project and providing the necessary assistance related to the study. We are also grateful to Head of Division, Post Harvest Technology, CIFE for the facilities provided during laboratory analysis.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12129
  • [From(publication date):
    October-2012 - May 21, 2018]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8254
  • PDF downloads : 3875

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2018-19
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

© 2008- 2018 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
Leave Your Message 24x7